- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The word "best" is itself subjective. There's no such thing as an objective "best".
Hinduism has a different set of rules. Stop being so colloquial. :roll:
"Best" = that which most enables and empowers healthy biological imperatives and social structures.
That's your subjective interpretation.
The south seem to think they have a different set of rules, but they're still part of the United States.
Using examples of sub-cultures will not serve you because they are not sovereign apart from God.
In your opinion.
God can be interpreted from more than one context. Thus different rules.
More than one sub-culture, absolutely.
The existence of many sub-cultures within the United States in no way negates the existence of the United States, for example. Even when we passionately disagree on the interpretation of law, we are all still citizens of the same country and subject to the same federal title code.
I never claimed everyone was exactly uniform. I claimed that everyone was apart of the greater over-arching social organism.
True. But the fact that you think that that is the best description of what best is, and the fact that I disagree with your thinking that that is the best description of what best is proves my opinion to be correct in this instance.
But people in India are not part of the social organism in the US and vice versa.
The fact that you agree with me that your opinion is only what you personally believe proves my claim that your statement was just your opinion to be correct.
My claim has empirical exposition, your opinion does not.
Your claims about what "best" is can be objectively proven false, and therefore, my opinion becomes elevated from mere opinion to undeniable fact.
A uniform biology and other elements of cultural universal prove mine correct. Every healthy human needs social ties, language and common basic nutrition, for example.
If your opinion were correct then you would be able to point to a few major societies who have no social ties of any sort and eat only stale beach sand (for example).
Neither is the kidney a part of the foot, but both are part of the same body.
As a whole body, there are behaviors which are "best" for the body for it to be as healthy as it can be.
the common basic nutrition ain't true, different societies and cultures have different base nutrition needs that they have evolved to in their area, you try feeding a white person on the basic diet of an asian, and they will starve, for example.
What makes you think it is the Christian rule set?
You're arguing that there is no longer a control group by which to compare the multitude of human breeds, and I don't know that you're wrong.
I offer this example to test your position by: Which breed of human can live without ingesting water in any way? Protein? Minerals?
zombie humans, all they need is the occasional brain:lol:
i get what you're saying, but you can't really apply a single condition over the entire human race, especially not one based in religion, as you said in previous posts
I look at the species and observe condition already applied. I had nothing to do with it.
Every culture on earth needs it's members to refrain from needlessly killing or taking anther's property without just cause in order for those cultures to be most successful.
fair enough
A uniform biology and other elements of cultural universal prove mine correct. Every healthy human needs social ties, language and common basic nutrition, for example.
If your opinion were correct then you would be able to point to a few major societies who have no social ties of any sort and eat only stale beach sand (for example).
What makes you think I think the Christian rule set is "the" rules?
There is only one society: the society under God.
Everyone is a part of it, every saint and sinner, every angel and demon, and the rules are already available to all. Whether any particular individual is still trying to figure that out is subjective to the individual.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?