Moses is truly amazing. 3000 years later he has people believing he parted the Red Sea and wandered around the Sinai Peninsula for 40 years.
Some people seem to prefer symbolism over the literal or actual.Yes…..if people looked at the actual distance covered it was a relatively short journey….symbolism scares people who insist on the literal…..
Mel Brooks portrayed Moses the bestMoses is truly amazing. 3000 years later he has people believing he parted the Red Sea and wandered around the Sinai Peninsula for 40 years.
Some people seem to prefer symbolism over the literal or actual.
What makes you think they fear something? That's just silly presumption. The ones who try to avoid the literal or actual are more likely being the fearful ones.Yes….people are different….all at different levels….some find meaning in art and poetry for example…..and that is meaningless to those that are determined to remain literalists and materialists….they fear the realm of possibility….but it does simplify their lives…
What makes you think they fear something? That's just silly presumption. The ones who try to avoid the literal or actual are more likely being the fearful ones.
Reality is reality. Some seem unable to cope with or accept it. Some do. Simple fact.You have an argument if people neatly fit into either/or boxes…..reality is not quite that simple…..it does seem like you are presuming the either/or dichotomy ?
Reality is reality. Some seem unable to cope with or accept it. Some do. Simple fact.
Because it's simple. No need for the superfluous.Simplfing
Sounds like stuff Paul Bunyan reportedly did.Moses is truly amazing. 3000 years later he has people believing he parted the Red Sea and wandered around the Sinai Peninsula for 40 years.
lol...so do personal opinions...literal understanding bears little fruit…..
lol...so do personal opinions...
Let’s talk about Moses……just think about it. He wrote the first 5 books of the Bible giving details that happened 2;500 years prior to his birth……just amazing considering his nomadic life…….carefully revealing specific conversations of the ancients. By contrast the era that the New Testament covers is minuscule in comparison. We have unending debates about the New Testament but little about the Old Testament……think about this. It really seems like too much information produces less understanding, agreement or consensus. Realizing this I must suspect that looking within ourselves is perhaps where the ultimate answer lies…..and that this looking within means activating the Spirit. We demonstrate every day that denominations are not the answer and that Scripture is subject to interpretation……and literal understanding bears little fruit…..
lol...tell the truth...you're a JW incognito...Yes, speaking gibberish where nobody knows what they are saying is not "speaking in tongues" in the first place. On the day of Pentecost men from many nations of varying languages all heard the words of the apostles in their own language, i.e., they spoke only once and each of them understood those words in their own dialect without an interpreter, as the HS made it so they all understood what was said. Here is full and total understanding, not mumbo jumbo words, flailing around on the ground as if they are having a seizure and all the people shout "Amen", when nobody knows what the heck they said.
(Act 2:4) And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
(Act 2:5) And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.
(Act 2:6) Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language.
(Act 2:7) And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?
(Act 2:8) And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
(Act 2:9) Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,
(Act 2:10) Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,
(Act 2:11) Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
In fairness, the ancient Egyptian historical records that have survived to the present day consist of some weathered hieroglyphs and fragments of fragments of a handful of papyri and stele. Almost everything we know (which is next to nothing) about the real ancient Egyptian historical record comes to us second and third hand from sources that make it difficult to discern between what the record actually said and their own interjections. And, unlike Herodotus, those authors didn’t distinguish between rumor and what they were able to verify. The rest is archaeological supposition.If he actually existed at all.
Moses is not explicitly mentioned in ancient Egyptian historical records. While the names of some biblical figures, including Moses, share Egyptian elements, no contemporary Egyptian texts directly refer to him. Instead, popular Egyptian traditions preserved stories about Moses and the Israelites' departure, though not in written form, until much later
Moses didnt write the Pentateuch Leviticus is Civil law. There were many authors and considering the time it was written its insight is amazing. Using the allegory Genesis describes evolution way ahead of its time. Adam evolves form the beginning to the end. It also combines morals and free will with the allegory of the eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The abstract conception of God was too difficult fir many people so they created Jesus literally an idol by distorting the moral teaching od man to the fall of man and original sin which doesnt existLet’s talk about Moses……just think about it. He wrote the first 5 books of the Bible giving details that happened 2;500 years prior to his birth……just amazing considering his nomadic life…….carefully revealing specific conversations of the ancients. By contrast the era that the New Testament covers is minuscule in comparison. We have unending debates about the New Testament but little about the Old Testament……think about this. It really seems like too much information produces less understanding, agreement or consensus. Realizing this I must suspect that looking within ourselves is perhaps where the ultimate answer lies…..and that this looking within means activating the Spirit. We demonstrate every day that denominations are not the answer and that Scripture is subject to interpretation……and literal understanding bears little fruit…..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?