Thanks to Trump... End of World could be close...

A group of scientists and scholars, including 15 Nobel laureates, set the clock at 11:58 p.m. -- two minutes before the symbolic apocalyptic midnight.
...
before the clock struck 11:58 p.m. in both 2018 and 2019, the last time the world was considered so close to annihilation was in 1953, when the United States and the Soviet Union were in a nuclear arms race.

Click to expand...

So why are we so close to destruction? Nuclear weapons and climate change, experts say.
"In the nuclear realm, the United States abandoned the Iran nuclear deal and announced it would withdraw from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), grave steps towards a complete dismantlement of the global arms control process," the Bulletin said. "The Iran agreement is not perfect, but it serves the interest of the international community in restraining the spread of nuclear weapons."

As for climate change, "global carbon dioxide emissions -- which seemed to plateau earlier this decade -- resumed an upward climb in 2017 and 2018," the Bulletin said.
...
The scientists lambasted President Donald Trump's announcement to pull out of the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, "the main global accord on addressing climate change."

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

The "clock" makes a point, but is a rather silly way of making it. There is reason to attach significance to the reasons one might move the minute hand, but there sure isn't much point in putting any sort of weight on where they move it to.

Click to expand...

Slavister said:

I don't know... I think it is quite telling that since the height of the Cold War in 1953, they did not think we were closer to end of the world than now. And I don't think it's coincidental that the reasons behind their thinking are a direct result of Trump's actions.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

It's not the same "they" though, is it?

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

I'm not trying to downplay the absurdity and disruptiveness of Trump's behavior. But I don't think the clock's chosen position means much.

For one thing, the world seems to be settling into more of a cyberwar rather than hot war footing. I'd turn the clock back in light of that. Who nukes someone over cyber stuff, unless the cyber goes along with a hot war invasion?

Click to expand...

The nuclear-armed states remain committed to their arsenals, are determined to modernize their capabilities, and have increasingly espoused doctrines that envision nuclear use. Brash leaders, intense diplomatic disputes, and regional instabilities combine to create an international context in which nuclear dangers are all too real.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

I'm sure MAD is still a policy even if not official, but it looks less likely.

Click to expand...