Terrorists endorse Pelosi's 'good policy of dialogue'

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Terrorists endorse Pelosi's 'good policy of dialogue'
[SIZE=+1]Militants call House speaker's visit 'brave' and hope for talks with Iran[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Posted: April 4, 2007[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]2:14 p.m. Eastern[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]By Aaron Klein[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][SIZE=-1]© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com [/SIZE]

[/SIZE]
JERUSALEM – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit today to Syria – in which she called for dialogue with Damascus – was "brave" and "very appreciated" and could bring about "important changes" to America's foreign policy, including talks with "Middle East resistance groups," according to members of terror organizations here whose top leaders live in Syria.

"Nancy Pelosi understands the area (Middle East) well, more than Bush and Dr. (Condoleeza) Rice," said Al-Batch, speaking to WND from Gaza. "If the Democrats want to make negotiations with Syria, Hamas, and Hezbollah, this means the Democratic Party understands well what happens in this area and I think Pelosi will succeed. ... I hope she wins the next elections."

Al-Batch expressed hope Pelosi and the Democratic Party will pressure Bush to create dialogue with Syria and Middle East "resistance movements" and prompt an American withdrawal from Iraq.

"Bush and Dr. Rice made so many mistakes in the Middle East. Just look at Palestinian clashes and Iraq. But I think some changes are happening for the Bush administration's foreign policy because of the hand of Nancy Pelosi. I think the Democratic Party can do things the best. ... Pelosi is going down a good road by this policy of dialogue," he said.


Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas' military wing in the Gaza Strip, said the willingness by some lawmakers to talk with Syria "is proof of the importance of the resistance against the U.S."

"The Americans know and understand they are losing in Iraq and the Middle East and that their only chance to survive is to reduce hostilities with Arab countries and with Islam. Islam is the new giant of the world."

"Pelosi's visit to Syria was very brave. She is a brave woman," Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, told WND.

WorldNetDaily: Terrorists endorse Pelosi's 'good policy of dialogue'

Thanks Nancy Chamberlin, atleast you have the terrorists on your side you traitorous ****ing whore. And remember all that joking about her wearing a Hajib? Well it's not a joke anymore:

 

[Gibberish]

Good for her. She is reaching out and trying to reach a democratic solution to the problem. I'm glad terrorists realize someone is willing to talk and that democracy is still alive in the US.

Only if our President would try to expand democracy too.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

Good for her. She is reaching out and trying to reach a democratic solution to the problem. I'm glad terrorists realize someone is willing to talk and that democracy is still alive in the US.

Only if our President would try to expand democracy too.

and we certainly already know terrorists love good old fashioned democracy, don't we? :roll:

 

[Gibberish]

and we certainly already know terrorists love good old fashioned democracy, don't we? :roll:

Terrorists usually don't but it's obvious from the article that some of these can be persuaded seeing as they see her visit and talk as a positive move. YOu have two types of terrorist ideology here. One type is driven by religious ideology. The other is driven by fear and rebellion of a foreign occupier in their lands that they don't want there. The latter can be reasoned with, the first cannot.

Established countries (Syria and Iran) can most definitely reach a democratic solution.

Reaching a democratic solution with the established countries and those groups rebelling against a foreign occupation can and most definitely should be talked with democratically. The religious radicals should be hunted down with help from the others.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Good for her. She is reaching out and trying to reach a democratic solution to the problem.

Ya so did Neville Chamberlin, that worked out well didn't it. And just how can you reach a Democratic solution with a totalitarian dictatorship? She has no authority to do what she did she is undermining U.S. foreing policy and negotiating with state sponsors of terrorism, and you people applaud her for it? WTF is wrong with liberals.

I'm glad terrorists realize someone is willing to talk and that democracy is still alive in the US.

Actually they would love for Democracy to be dead in the U.S..

Only if our President would try to expand democracy too.

He has, infact he granted appx. 60 million people Democracy since taking office, and you people hate him for it, that's probably why Democrats get along so well with Syria and Iran, they have so much in common.

 

[Iriemon]

Terrorists usually don't but it's obvious from the article that some of these can be persuaded seeing as they see her visit and talk as a positive move. YOu have two types of terrorist ideology here. One type is driven by religious ideology. The other is driven by fear and rebellion of a foreign occupier in their lands that they don't want there. The latter can be reasoned with, the first cannot.

Established countries (Syria and Iran) can most definitely reach a democratic solution.

Reaching a democratic solution with the established countries and those groups rebelling against a foreign occupation can and most definitely should be talked with democratically. The religious radicals should be hunted down with help from the others.

Ron Reagan knew that. He had the terrorist evil empire SU to deal with, yet was wise enough to realize the best hope for a resolution was to reach out to those terrorists and communicate with them, as opposed to sticking his head in the sand and saying "we don't deal with evil empires." As a result significant accords were reached on nuclear weapons, and a dialouge was created that lead to reforms in the SU and eventually and end to the cold war.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

He has, infact he granted appx. 60 million people

Bravo. :agree

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Ron Reagan knew that. He had the terrorist evil empire SU to deal with, yet was wise enough to realize the best hope for a resolution was to reach out to those terrorists and communicate with them, as opposed to sticking his head in the sand and saying "we don't deal with evil empires." As a result significant accords were reached on nuclear weapons, and a dialouge was created that lead to reforms in the SU and eventually and end to the cold war.

WTF are you on? He followed a policy of confrontation and escalation until Soviets had no other choice but to negotiate because they could no longer afford to compete with the U.S..

 

[Iriemon]

WTF are you on? He followed a policy of confrontation and escalation until Soviets had no other choice but to negotiate because they could no longer afford to compete with the U.S..

WTF are you on? He made several trips to Moscow, actually TALKED TO THE ENEMY, (~GASP~) and actually proposed a plan that both sides eliminate all their nukes!

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Terrorists usually don't but it's obvious from the article that some of these can be persuaded seeing as they see her visit and talk as a positive move. YOu have two types of terrorist ideology here. One type is driven by religious ideology. The other is driven by fear and rebellion of a foreign occupier in their lands that they don't want there. The latter can be reasoned with, the first cannot.

Established countries (Syria and Iran) can most definitely reach a democratic solution.

Reaching a democratic solution with the established countries and those groups rebelling against a foreign occupation can and most definitely should be talked with democratically. The religious radicals should be hunted down with help from the others.

It's obvious from the article that the goals of the terrorists and the goals of the Democratic party are exactly the same that is the defeat of the United States and terrorist victory in Iraq.

 

[Iriemon]

Thanks Nancy Chamberlin, atleast you have the terrorists on your side you traitorous ****ing whore. And remember all that joking about her wearing a Hajib? Well it's not a joke anymore:

More traitorous whores wearing Hajibs:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/526319-post14.html

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

WTF are you on? He made several trips to Moscow, actually TALKED TO THE ENEMY, (~GASP~) and actually proposed a plan that both sides eliminate all their nukes!

Not until the Soviets were on their knees pal.

 

[PrimBabUB]

Thanks Nancy Chamberlin, atleast you have the terrorists on your side you traitorous ****ing whore. And remember all that joking about her wearing a Hajib? Well it's not a joke anymore:

What a piece of ****. Going over there with her partisian agenda.

Oh! Hey! Look at me! I'm Nancy ****ing Pelosi and I'm going to save the day not only for American but for the whole ****ing world!!!!!

NP can shut the **** up.

Let me give you a clue NP. While you were over there with your partisan BS, suck up ****........Ahmacluslessashole was proclaiming all over the world how that British dame shouldn't have been in the military at all, being a woman and all that.

There she was in her little "headscarf" proclaimg to the world that woman should surrender to "men".

No 'ifs' 'and' 'no' 'buts' 'about' 'it'.

There you go America. There goes Nancy Pelosi. Giving away every thing this country and America stands for in regards to "WOMENS RIGHTS".

Yeah, Nancy. Loved the headscarf. While you were on your little golden power trip of being speaker of the house and cowing down to someone who doesn't even recognize rights for women, were you getting off, somehow?

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

More traitorous whores wearing Hajibs:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/526319-post14.html

They met with our allies with the consent of the executive, Pelosi met with our enemies, against the wishes of our executive, and pursued a separate foreign policy.

 

[Iriemon]

It's obvious from the article that the goals of the terrorists and the goals of the Democratic party are exactly the same that is the defeat of the United States and terrorist victory in Iraq.

Ha Ha you're just gullible as this Adminstration and they play you guys for fools just like they goaded the US into attacking Iraq. You're believing the terrorists now? Those terrorists want the US to stay in Iraq. That's why they try to goad us. They want jihad, and Iraq is the best thing that ever happened for their cause.

 

[Gibberish]

Ya so did Neville Chamberlin, that worked out well didn't it. And just how can you reach a Democratic solution with a totalitarian dictatorship? She has no authority to do what she did she is undermining U.S. foreing policy and negotiating with state sponsors of terrorism, and you people applaud her for it? WTF is wrong with liberals.

She went and was met positively by everyone but the US President and the right wing of the country. Diplomacy should be the first a foremost foreign policy, even with terrorists. You don't defeat a bully by being a bully.

Actually they would love for Democracy to be dead in the U.S..

I'm sure they would but I assume they are somewhat intelligent and know they have no chance against the US.

He has, infact he granted appx. 60 million people Democracy since taking office, and you people hate him for it, that's probably why Democrats get along so well with Syria and Iran, they have so much in common.

Going into Iraq, toppling the government, removing the army and saying "You are liberated, you cant thank us later" hasn't exactly gone over to well you know. Unless you see putting a country into a state of anarchy while allowing people to vote (if they survive the trip to vote) for a government that has no power a success.

 

[Gibberish]

What a piece of ****. Going over there with her partisian agenda.

Oh! Hey! Look at me! I'm Nancy ****ing Pelosi and I'm going to save the day not only for American but for the whole ****ing world!!!!!

NP can shut the **** up.

Let me give you a clue NP. While you were over there with your partisan BS, suck up ****........Ahmacluslessashole was proclaiming all over the world how that British dame shouldn't have been in the military at all, being a woman and all that.

There she was in her little "headscarf" proclaimg to the world that woman should surrender to "men".

No 'ifs' 'and' 'no' 'buts' 'about' 'it'.

There you go America. There goes Nancy Pelosi. Giving away every thing this country and America stands for in regards to "WOMENS RIGHTS".

Yeah, Nancy. Loved the headscarf. While you were on your little golden power trip of being speaker of the house and cowing down to someone who doesn't even recognize rights for women, were you getting off, somehow?

Thanks for the inspiring addition to the conversation. :2wave:

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Ha Ha you're just gullible as this Adminstration and they play you guys for fools just like they goaded the US into attacking Iraq. You're believing the terrorists now? Those terrorists want the US to stay in Iraq. That's why they try to goad us. They want jihad, and Iraq is the best thing that ever happened for their cause.

You're out of your god damn mind, the terrorists want us out of Iraq so they can establish a Taliban like state there. While they do want Jihad, what they really want is victory in that Jihad which is exactly what the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will give them just as the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan did.

 

[Gibberish]

You're out of your god damn mind, the terrorists want us out of Iraq so they can establish a Taliban like state there. While they do want Jihad, what they really want is victory in that Jihad which is exactly what the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will give them just as the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan did.

Who is going to control Iraq when we leave? It's pretty obvious the Iraq government and army will not be able to do so this decade. Or do you plan on us not leaving in the next, say 10 years?

If the Iraq government does come under fire are we going to jump in and save the day? That's a pretty sweet deal for Iraq. They don't have to worry about a thing because America will take care of everything for them.

 

[Iriemon]

You're out of your god damn mind, the terrorists want us out of Iraq so they can establish a Taliban like state there. While they do want Jihad, what they really want is victory in that Jihad which is exactly what the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will give them just as the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan did.

Sure keep fighting their jihad, just like they want you to do. The terrorists thank you for accomplishing their goal. And while you're at it, tell us about how they are going to take over American and blow us all up and make our kids swear to allah. Promoting terror is just what they want.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

She went and was met positively by everyone but the US President and the right wing of the country.

She was met positively by terrorists and state terrorist sponsors, hay newsflash, Hitler welcomed Neville Chamberlin positively tool because he knew that he was a useful idiot that he could push around.

Diplomacy should be the first a foremost foreign policy, even with terrorists.

You just said we should negotiate with terrorists, wow. :roll:

You don't defeat a bully by being a bully.

Actually that's the only way you can defeat a bully.

Going into Iraq, toppling the government, removing the army and saying "You are liberated, you cant thank us later" hasn't exactly gone over to well you know. Unless you see putting a country into a state of anarchy while allowing people to vote (if they survive the trip to vote) for a government that has no power a success.

Actually I would consider elections that had a higher % of voters than our 2000 elections in a country that is 90% stabilized a great success.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Who is going to control Iraq when we leave? It's pretty obvious the Iraq government and army will not be able to do so this decade.

According to who?

Or do you plan on us not leaving in the next, say 10 years?

I plan on leaving when the Iraqi government says that they no longer need us there.

If the Iraq government does come under fire are we going to jump in and save the day? That's a pretty sweet deal for Iraq. They don't have to worry about a thing because America will take care of everything for them.

Well you people didn't seem to have much of a problem with us doing that in Kosovo where we still have troops, we also still have troops in Germany, Japan, and Korea.

 

[Trajan Octavian Titus]

Sure keep fighting their jihad, just like they want you to do.

The alternative is allowing them victory in their Jihad.

The terrorists thank you for accomplishing their goal.

Actually their goal is to drive the U.S. out of the M.E. and make us surrender from the world starting with Iraq, that is what you are trying to help them do.

And while you're at it, tell us about how they are going to take over American and blow us all up and make our kids swear to allah. Promoting terror is just what they want.

lmfao, you have the most convoluted worldview I've ever seen you think that surrendering to the terrorists and allowing them to over run Iraq is how to achieve victory, wow just wow.

 

[PrimBabUB]

Ha Ha you're just gullible as this Adminstration and they play you guys for fools just like they goaded the US into attacking Iraq. You're believing the terrorists now? Those terrorists want the US to stay in Iraq. That's why they try to goad us. They want jihad, and Iraq is the best thing that ever happened for their cause.

I'd say that attacking the US was the best thing that ever happened to the terroists because they get to see first hand via the media of people like you, of, how easy it will be to overtake a county that is overly willing to be complaisance.

 

[bandaidwoman]

I posted this on another thread but how is her visit any differnt from republican arlen specter who visited syria last year despite bush's opposition?

Senator Arlen Specter - Pennsylvania