It is not a lie. They did speak to the whistleblower. It's in the article.Only quote provided. Also not a lie.
Did you forget what your original accusation was, re the trumpc ampaign and russia? Haha, you did.
You got fooled again. Easy pickings.
The only lies here are yours.
I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.It is not a lie. They did speak to the whistleblower. It's in the article
"They"They did speak to the whistleblower.
Correct. He got fooled again.I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.
Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides. You good with that?They should all be removed to "hold them accountable."
Sure, since I'm against both sides, I'm more than good with that. You?Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides. You good with that?
It literally says the whistleblower spoke to a committee person. Schiff said "we" did not speak to him. He lied. They did.I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.
Lie. Good god, maybe read your own links once in a while.It literally says the whistleblower spoke to a committee person.
Did you read my long post?Sure, since I'm against both sides, I'm more than good with that. You?
Sounds fine to me. So, who do you think should be held accountable on your side?Did you read my long post?
Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides.
No it says he spoke with a staffer who advised him to go to the IG. Staffers are not on the Committee. Nuanced to be sure but not a lie. Interesting how you don't hold your "side" to the same lofty standards.It literally says the whistleblower spoke to a committee person. Schiff said "we" did not speak to him. He lied. They did.
I don't really have "a side" per say but as I have already indicated, Rep Omar could be looked into. Any T-Repub Reps you wish to be looked into?Sounds fine to me. So, who do you think should be held accountable on your side?
Rick Scott.I don't really have "a side" per say but as I have already indicated, Rep Omar could be looked into. Any T-Repub Reps you wish to be looked into?
I like defunding ICE. They’re people who get a jolly out of tormenting people. I’d never say thank you for your service to em.Omar is a Police/ICE Defunder supporter, a BDS (Boycott, Divest & Sanctions) supporter & anti-Semitic. Do the Dems really want to defend her?
Tormenting people....people like rapists, murderers, thieves.I like defunding ICE. They’re people who get a jolly out of tormenting people.
ICE yes.Tormenting people....people like rapists, murderers, thieves.
I think Omar is the MTG of the Democratic Party and would happily endorse her being booted from committees.
I don’t understand the other two. Those sound like a simple good old fashioned revenge play.
It will be in 2024.Payback is a bitch.
We will see.It will be in 2024.
And MTG is not an attention seeker ?Great news for the country!
Thanks!
That lady was obnoxious and those two gentlemen were publicity seekers.
One gentleman's relationship with a lady from another country has never been clarified; the other gentleman will reportedly be busy anyway planning his campaign to eventually replace an elderly lady Senator from California.
I wish, however, that the presumed next Speaker had not mentioned those three individuals' names. There was no need to do so.
It would have been more classy to simply announce (after he does become Speaker) only the names of the new committee members.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?