• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sweatshops and Globalization (1 Viewer)

Ethereal

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
8,211
Reaction score
4,180
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Sweatshops and Globalization

by Radley Balko

...

When New York Times journalists Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl Wudunn went to Asia to live, they were outraged when they first arrived at the sweatshop conditions Asian factory workers worked under. Like most westerners, the thought of 14+ hour shifts six or seven days a week with no overtime pay seemed unconscionable.

After spending some time in the region, however, Kristof and Wudunn slowly came to the conclusion that, while regrettable, sweatshops are an important part of a developing nation’s journey to prosperity. The two later documented the role of sweatshops in emerging economies in their book Thunder from the East. Kristof and Wudunn relay one anecdote that helped them reach their conclusion in the New York Times:

One of the half-dozen men and women sitting on a bench eating was a sinewy, bare-chested laborer in his late 30's named Mongkol Latlakorn. It was a hot, lazy day, and so we started chatting idly about the food and, eventually, our families. Mongkol mentioned that his daughter, Darin, was 15, and his voice softened as he spoke of her. She was beautiful and smart, and her father's hopes rested on her.

"Is she in school?" we asked.

"Oh, no," Mongkol said, his eyes sparkling with amusement. "She's working in a factory in Bangkok. She's making clothing for export to America." He explained that she was paid $2 a day for a nine-hour shift, six days a week.

"It's dangerous work," Mongkol added. "Twice the needles went right through her hands. But the managers bandaged up her hands, and both times she got better again and went back to work."

"How terrible," we murmured sympathetically.

Mongkol looked up, puzzled. "It's good pay," he said. "I hope she can keep that job. There's all this talk about factories closing now, and she said there are rumors that her factory might close. I hope that doesn't happen. I don't know what she would do then."

...

In the early 1990s, the United States Congress considered a piece of legislation called the "Child Labor Deterrence Act," which would have taken punitive action against companies benefiting from child labor. The Act never passed, but the public debate it triggered put enormous pressure on a number of multinational corporations. One German garment maker that would have been hit with trade repercussions if the Act had passed laid off 50,000 child workers in Bangladesh. The British charity organization Oxfam later conducted a study which found that thousands of those laid-off children later became prostitutes, turned to crime, or starved to death.

The United Nations organization UNICEF reports that an international boycott of the Nepalese carpet industry in the mid-1990s caused several plants to shut down, and forced thousands of Nepalese girls into prostitution.

In 1995, a consortium of anti-sweatshop groups threw the spotlight on football (soccer) stitching plants in Pakistan. In particular, the effort targeted enforcing a ban on sweatshop soccer balls by the time the 1998 World Cup began in France. In response, Nike and Reebok shut down their plants in Pakistan and several other companies followed suit. The result: tens of thousands of Pakistanis were again unemployed. According to UPI, mean family income in Pakistan fell by more than 20%.

Full Article @ A World Connected - Sweatshops and Globalization
 
You know, it's not something I ever thought of before, but there's some truth here. It's not an admirable state of affairs, but America went through the sweatshop stage as well. Hopefully these countries will grow out of it as well.
 
I think the problem with Sweatshops I have are two fold (Globalization is another beast that I really don't want to get into):

1) In order to expand operations of company that uses sweatshops you are going have to find people who are not currently "modernized" and you are going to have to convince them that you know what is best for them. That your way of life is better than their way of life.
I believe you commented in another thread, Etheral, about how you wish the school systems would offer more trade skills, than just plain academics. You will find as you crawl further up the modernized ladder you find fewer and fewer people incapable of even the most Human of all tasks-- growing their own food.
So, how do you go and convince people that your way, with electricity that can run out, with technology that can break and few can repair, with universities that speak lies, and primary schools that don't teach you how to be a craftsman?
Within our life time, we may see the very last of the self-sufficient people begin the climb up the "modernized" ladder. Does this modern livelihood increase the "Quality of Life" or just the "Standard of Living". We already know that we work in the 21st Century more than people ever have. Is that really a better quality of life?

2) I do feel that some sweatshops are horrendous.


Just musingggg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom