Yes, I do.
And I know you're wrong.
and I know you think I'm wrong as well.
So, there's not much more to say, is there?
It's a very good thing that libertarian 'thought' has never been found to be useful in the structure of civilisation.
I'm of course not wrong. Just as I am not responsible for your feelings I am not responsible for your actions.
Are you responsible for running over people in a crowded theatre to escape a fire? Or is it just 'their problem' for being organized enough to be leaving in an orderly manner?
:lol: I believe I already covered that. The answer is yes.
So then the people panicking ARE culpable under the 1A.
Thanks.
It will be interesting to find out who paid for Mr Daleiden's little cinema project
Here's some general fact checking:What is the nature of the deceptive editing?
Did the folks actually not say what they appear to be saying?
You have a link that shows the edited version compared to the unedited version and demonstrates the way(s) in which the words were twisted, taken out of context or whatever?
The clips I watched seemed like complete sentences and no coersion or tampering in the body of the clip.
I'm not a video pathologist, but to the layman...
All I'm asking for is the link and a little guidance to exact example that you are actually pointing to as the deceptive editing.
Here's some general fact checking:
Unspinning the Planned Parenthood Video
Since you admit you're lacking in professional level video pathology skills, here's a detailed high-level professional forensic analysis to set you in the right direction (in .pdf):
http://ppfa.pr-optout.com/ViewAttachment.aspx?EID=mr9WXYw4u2IxYnni1dBRVk3HDyuhhkPMnFMCvK5fVC8%3d
Also, here's CNN's investigatory story finding the videographer had edited-in images of a non-aborted stillborn to portray a PP abortion that never occurred, with his deception coming to light when the original birthmother come forward to challenge the video [Even Carly Fiorina was tripped-up when she used another segment of the video while campaigning, and it came to light that segment also had images altered to portray another PP abortion that never occurred]:
The real story behind those Planned Parenthood videos - CNNPolitics.com
The videographer also portrays the $30-100 legally specified harvesting reimbursement costs as "selling body parts for profit", which is again false & deceptive.
So there's a myriad of deception & misrepresentation going on here, some of which may be above your (or my) technical ability to discern, and it seems to be manifest in the group hiding from the courts, rather than standing-up for their work.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?