- Joined
- Oct 25, 2017
- Messages
- 11,506
- Reaction score
- 3,207
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...daca-immigration-program-place-now/371730002/
"The action represents*a temporary victory for*the young adults brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents or guardians under*the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program established by President Barack Obama in 2012. And it represents a major setback for the Trump administration, which vowed*to continue the legal battle in the lower courts."
So the judicial system swats down another manufactured crisis. The March 5, deadline was always arbitrary, but Congress still needs to work expeditiously to resolve an issue that most Americans want solved and on which most of them agree.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...daca-immigration-program-place-now/371730002/
"The action represents*a temporary victory for*the young adults brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents or guardians under*the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program established by President Barack Obama in 2012. And it represents a major setback for the Trump administration, which vowed*to continue the legal battle in the lower courts."
So the judicial system swats down another manufactured crisis. The March 5, deadline was always arbitrary, but Congress still needs to work expeditiously to resolve an issue that most Americans want solved and on which most of them agree.
Still I scratch my head wondering why illegal aliens are so much more important to left wingers than their fellow American citizens.
This decision is not anything like a final decision on the matter. I have faith that the court will uphold the law. Otherwise, what is the point of having a country?
Still I scratch my head wondering why illegal aliens are so much more important to left wingers than their fellow American citizens.
This decision is not anything like a final decision on the matter. I have faith that the court will uphold the law. Otherwise, what is the point of having a country?
Still I scratch my head wondering why illegal aliens are so much more important to left wingers than their fellow American citizens.
This decision is not anything like a final decision on the matter. I have faith that the court will uphold the law. Otherwise, what is the point of having a country?
Still I scratch my head wondering why illegal aliens are so much more important to left wingers than their fellow American citizens.
This decision is not anything like a final decision on the matter. I have faith that the court will uphold the law. Otherwise, what is the point of having a country?
Still I scratch my head wondering why illegal aliens are so much more important to left wingers than their fellow American citizens.
This decision is not anything like a final decision on the matter. I have faith that the court will uphold the law. Otherwise, what is the point of having a country?
Left wingers don't actually have that opinion.
I scratch my head as to why someone would try and pass that off as somehow, magically, based in reality.
Oh but that's what they have to ell themselves, that we all hate America. It's completely ridiculous.
Doing nothing is the SCOTUS preferred course of action.
I know, but consider who the OP is and his history....
I find this action by the SCOTUS concerning, to allow a lower courts ruling to be upheld based on something that is clearly unconstitutional is just beyond me. DACA was a policy that was enacted by Obama, not congress. Congress has the responsibility to enact and to change immigration laws, not the POTUS. The POTUS being the head of the Executive Branch has the responsibility to enforce the laws of this country and has taken an oath to enforce the laws of this country.
So who's the blame for this? Who's the blame for not enforcing the laws within this counrty, and since when do we not enforce laws based on an economical reason. We are a nation of laws or we are not, can a nation that professes to honor the rule of law reward those who break it? Can a nation that rewards the breaking of a law hope or expect its immigrants to assimilate into a law-abiding a society when, through that very process, it demonstrates its disregard, if not contempt for the law?
This really makes me wonder just were we are headed as a nation.
Not only does the court hear lots of cases and sometimes issue transformational rulings, but to decline a case is not doing nothing. It's affirming the decision of the lower court.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...daca-immigration-program-place-now/371730002/
"The action represents*a temporary victory for*the young adults brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents or guardians under*the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program established by President Barack Obama in 2012. And it represents a major setback for the Trump administration, which vowed*to continue the legal battle in the lower courts."
So the judicial system swats down another manufactured crisis. The March 5, deadline was always arbitrary, but Congress still needs to work expeditiously to resolve an issue that most Americans want solved and on which most of them agree.
I find this action by the SCOTUS concerning, to allow a lower courts ruling to be upheld based on something that is clearly unconstitutional is just beyond me. DACA was a policy that was enacted by Obama, not congress. Congress has the responsibility to enact and to change immigration laws, not the POTUS. The POTUS being the head of the Executive Branch has the responsibility to enforce the laws of this country and has taken an oath to enforce the laws of this country.
So who's the blame for this? Who's the blame for not enforcing the laws within this counrty, and since when do we not enforce laws based on an economical reason. We are a nation of laws or we are not, can a nation that professes to honor the rule of law reward those who break it? Can a nation that rewards the breaking of a law hope or expect its immigrants to assimilate into a law-abiding a society when, through that very process, it demonstrates its disregard, if not contempt for the law?
This really makes me wonder just were we are headed as a nation.
And beyond that how is that a policy that was enacted by a sitting president can not be undone by a predecessor? When did obama become king?I find this action by the SCOTUS concerning, to allow a lower courts ruling to be upheld based on something that is clearly unconstitutional is just beyond me. DACA was a policy that was enacted by Obama, not congress. Congress has the responsibility to enact and to change immigration laws, not the POTUS. The POTUS being the head of the Executive Branch has the responsibility to enforce the laws of this country and has taken an oath to enforce the laws of this country.
So who's the blame for this? Who's the blame for not enforcing the laws within this counrty, and since when do we not enforce laws based on an economical reason. We are a nation of laws or we are not, can a nation that professes to honor the rule of law reward those who break it? Can a nation that rewards the breaking of a law hope or expect its immigrants to assimilate into a law-abiding a society when, through that very process, it demonstrates its disregard, if not contempt for the law?
This really makes me wonder just were we are headed as a nation.
That's patently absurd.It's affirming the decision of the lower court.
I find this action by the SCOTUS concerning, to allow a lower courts ruling to be upheld based on something that is clearly unconstitutional is just beyond me. DACA was a policy that was enacted by Obama, not congress. Congress has the responsibility to enact and to change immigration laws, not the POTUS. The POTUS being the head of the Executive Branch has the responsibility to enforce the laws of this country and has taken an oath to enforce the laws of this country.
So who's the blame for this? Who's the blame for not enforcing the laws within this counrty, and since when do we not enforce laws based on an economical reason. We are a nation of laws or we are not, can a nation that professes to honor the rule of law reward those who break it? Can a nation that rewards the breaking of a law hope or expect its immigrants to assimilate into a law-abiding a society when, through that very process, it demonstrates its disregard, if not contempt for the law?
This really makes me wonder just were we are headed as a nation.
I know, but consider who the OP is and his history....
Nope, it is simply the SCOTUS letting it stand "without prejudice" meaning that it can be appealed again.
I represents nothing.
The court is simply forcing it to go through the court system like it normally does.
The court does not see a need for an immediate review ( which is what the WH wanted)
This is standard procedure for the court.
What is my history?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?