Supreme Court orders Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy reinstated

[gbg3]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Mr Person]

At least they don't pretend to care about their plight, unlike Afghanis...

___________
Anyway. Text of the order, linked to in her link (pdf download):

The application for a stay presented to Justice Alito and
by him referred to the Court is denied. The applicants have
failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the
memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not
arbitrary and capricious. See Department of Homeland Security v.
Regents of Univ. of Cal., 591 U. S. ___ (2020) (slip op., at 912,
17-26). Our order denying the Government’s request for a stay
of the District Court injunction should not be read as affecting
the construction of that injunction by the Court of Appeals.
Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would grant the application.

 

[Chomsky]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

Interesting.

Reuters is claiming the Judges' referenced Trump not being able to end the Obama's DACA order, when basing their decision. Looks like, ''what-comes-around-goes-around.

But all this means is Biden, like Trump, can end a former-President's E.O. He just has to do it properly.

We'll have to see if Biden does take the effort to properly end the E.O. I hope he doesn't, as I unusually was in agreement with Trump here.

Reuters' article, if interested:

Supreme Court requires Biden to revive Trump's 'remain in Mexico' immigration policy

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday denied President Joe Biden's bid to rescind an immigration policy implemented by his predecessor, Donald Trump, that forced thousands of asylum seekers to stay in Mexico awaiting U.S. hearings.

www.reuters.com

 

[Jkca1]

Common sense prevails.

 

[Chomsky]

At least they don't pretend to care about their plight, unlike Afghanis...

___________
Anyway. Text of the order, linked to in her link (pdf download):

The application for a stay presented to Justice Alito and
by him referred to the Court is denied. The applicants have
failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the
memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not
arbitrary and capricious. See Department of Homeland Security v.
Regents of Univ. of Cal., 591 U. S. ___ (2020) (slip op., at 912,
17-26). Our order denying the Government’s request for a stay
of the District Court injunction should not be read as affecting
the construction of that injunction by the Court of Appeals.
Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would grant the application.

Interestingly, Reuters is claiming the Judges' referenced Trump not being able to end the Obama's DACA order, when basing their decision.

The court's decision referenced its 2020 ruling that thwarted Trump's bid to end a program introduced by Democratic former President Barack Obama that protects from deportation hundreds of thousands of immigrants - often called “Dreamers” - who entered the United States illegally as children.

Both cases concern whether the government followed the correct legal process in unwinding a previous administration's policy.

Supreme Court requires Biden to revive Trump's 'remain in Mexico' immigration policy

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday denied President Joe Biden's bid to rescind an immigration policy implemented by his predecessor, Donald Trump, that forced thousands of asylum seekers to stay in Mexico awaiting U.S. hearings.

www.reuters.com

 

[Chomsky]

Common sense prevails.

Only temporarily, perhaps. The ball is in Biden's hands, now.

 

[trixare4kids]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

If the Biden administration defiantly chooses to ignore the order, curtains for them in the next two elections; midterms/presidential.

 

[Clicker III]

This should be cause to return those who were already allowed into the country instead of waiting in Mexico.

 

[Clicker III]

If the Biden administration defiantly chooses to ignore the order, curtains for them in the next two elections; midterms/presidential.

Appearance is that the dems won't care until their targeted number of illegals is safely imbedded here.

 

[Mr Person]

Interestingly, Reuters is claiming the Judges' referenced Trump not being able to end the Obama's DACA order, when basing their decision.

Supreme Court requires Biden to revive Trump's 'remain in Mexico' immigration policy

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday denied President Joe Biden's bid to rescind an immigration policy implemented by his predecessor, Donald Trump, that forced thousands of asylum seekers to stay in Mexico awaiting U.S. hearings.

www.reuters.com

To be clear, I haven't chased the decision down. I'd assume at the start the issue had something to do with the APA (Administrative Procedure Act). If the court referenced the DACA stuff, it's pretty much certain.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

US released 375,000 illegal immigrants who entered with family members​

US released 375,000 illegal immigrants who entered with family members - Washington Examiner

More than 375,000 of the 473,682 immigrants who were caught illegally crossing the southern border with a family member in fiscal 2019 were released by federal law enforcement into the interior of the United States, according to data obtained by the Washington Examiner. From Oct. 1, 2018 and...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Two steps backwards, one step forward. The sign of a true con artist, which Donald Trump is.

 

[Grim17]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

Finally... I can't understand why it took this long for the southern border insanity to be stopped.

.

 

[Common Sense 1]

Good ruling. The beginning of some slight control at the border.
Just one more failure of the Biden administration.

 

[Chomsky]

To be clear, I haven't chased the decision down. I'd assume at the start the issue had something to do with the APA (Administrative Procedure Act). If the court referenced the DACA stuff, it's pretty much certain.

Yes, I agree. Likely the APA.

Thanks for the response!

 

[KingLeo]

Surprising that a far right controlled Supreme Court upholds a far right conservative policy?
Laughable and predictable.

 

[Court Jester]

THANK YOU SCOTUS!!

Remain in Mexico bitches! Just like the law says. Our country not yours!

Hells yeah!!!

Boo-yah!

 

[Court Jester]

Finally... I can't understand why it took this long for the southern border insanity to be stopped.

.

Because the democrat open border policy is an investment in future votes, and that is all.

 

[GummyVitamins]

Interesting.

Reuters is claiming the Judges' referenced Trump not being able to end the Obama's DACA order, when basing their decision. Looks like, ''what-comes-around-goes-around.

But all this means is Biden, like Trump, can end a former-President's E.O. He just has to do it properly.

We'll have to see if Biden does take the effort to properly end the E.O. I hope he doesn't, as I unusually was in agreement with Trump here.

Reuters' article, if interested:

Supreme Court requires Biden to revive Trump's 'remain in Mexico' immigration policy

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday denied President Joe Biden's bid to rescind an immigration policy implemented by his predecessor, Donald Trump, that forced thousands of asylum seekers to stay in Mexico awaiting U.S. hearings.

www.reuters.com

Biden should take the win, like Trump did on DACA and just drop it. Overturning this will cause more harm than good. He can run around crying about how unfair the Supreme Court is and how he should have unique standards not given to his predecessor. Radical Democrats can even use this for fundraising in upcoming elections and use this as a catalyst to dress in white and fake cry next to an open gate again.

 

[GummyVitamins]

To be clear, I haven't chased the decision down. I'd assume at the start the issue had something to do with the APA (Administrative Procedure Act). If the court referenced the DACA stuff, it's pretty much certain.

It affirms the lower court's ruling. The irony here is the liberal justices on the court not following their own precedent.

Judge orders DHS to restart Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/13/judge-orders-dhs-restart-trumps-remain-mexico-poli/ A federal judge ordered Homeland Security to restart President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy, ruling Friday that the Biden administration cut too many corners when it scrapped the get-tough...

debatepolitics.com

 

[GummyVitamins]

Surprising that a far right controlled Supreme Court upholds a far right conservative policy?
Laughable and predictable.

It's precedent set by the liberal justices. They created this outcome when they did the same thing to DACA.

 

[Court Jester]

It affirms the lower court's ruling. The irony here is the liberal justices on the court not following their own precedent.

Judge orders DHS to restart Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/13/judge-orders-dhs-restart-trumps-remain-mexico-poli/ A federal judge ordered Homeland Security to restart President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy, ruling Friday that the Biden administration cut too many corners when it scrapped the get-tough...

debatepolitics.com

Totally expected. Liberal do as I say, not as I do thing always.

 

[Rawley]

Finally, a little bit of sanity into this crazy last week! This is very good news.

MSN

www.msn.com

Do you believe Biden will listen to them? He's already told them to **** themselves in the eviction moratorium

 

[gbg3]

Do you believe Biden will listen to them? He's already told them to **** themselves n the eviction moratorium

Excellent point! We'll see if he listens or not. If he's smart, he will because his poll numbers on the border are not good! He'll lose even more political ground than he has already has recently (due to his horrible handling of Afghanistan), if he ignores this SCOTUS decision.

 

[Rawley]

Excellent point! We'll see if he listens or not. If he's smart, he will because his poll numbers on the border are not good! He'll lose even more political ground than he has already has recently (due to his horrible handling of Afghanistan), if he ignores this SCOTUS decision.

At this point, I don't think he give a flying **** about his poll numbers. Even if he lasts another three years (I've predicted he won't see his second year) no way in hell would he run again.

 

[GummyVitamins]

At this point, I don't think he give a flying **** about his poll numbers. Even if he lasts another three years (I've predicted he won't see his second year) no way in hell would he run again.

He may care about his legacy. Every President eventually starts thinking about that. I'm sure he doesn't want to be Jimmy Carter 2.0.