As long as they keep their pants up.Supreme Court allows Oregon city policy that punishes homeless people for sleeping on public property
The justices ruled that ordinances in Grants Pass do not violate the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment.www.nbcnews.com
What are they supposed to do...squat?
Suuure.Finally the madness is ending.
Finally the madness is ending.
Maybe, but only because it is a small town.Nope, but likely moving out of that jurisdiction.
Maybe, but only because it is a small town.
If they are going to set up camp they need to do so legally. Every town has a designated area where camping, at least temporarily, is allowed. Often these are camp grounds just outside of town, and often these camp grounds require a small payment for the services they provide.Supreme Court allows Oregon city policy that punishes homeless people for sleeping on public property
The justices ruled that ordinances in Grants Pass do not violate the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment.www.nbcnews.com
What are they supposed to do...squat?
Finally the madness is ending.
If they are going to set up camp they need to do so legally. Every town has a designated area where camping, at least temporarily, is allowed. Often these are camp grounds just outside of town, and often these camp grounds require a small payment for the services they provide.
People who set up camp in public parks, where they are not allowed to camp, should be arrested and their property confiscated. They can spend the night in jail and then pay an even bigger fine when they are eventually released. Nobody gets to violate the law with impunity, not even the homeless.
They have added a new twist to the solution in Anchorage. Homeless camps are being evicted over federal ADA compliance. It is a violation of the American Disability Act for people to reside in a pedestrian walkway, and Anchorage is enforcing that federal law very strictly these days.Finally the madness is ending.
They are supposed to not set up tents and squat in places like parks and sidewalks that belong to everyone.What are the homeless supposed to do now?
Is that where the I-5 Rest Area is? One time we tried to stop there late in the evening and we couldn't even find a parking spot. lots of questionable cars there.Riverside Park in Grants Pass, Oregon is a public park and is open from sunrise to sunset with no overnight allowed, this applies to everyone who visits the park. What Riverside Park is not, is a public campground for the homeless, Grants Pass has the right to enforce its city ordinances no one is exempt. Riverside Park is located along the Rogue River in Grants Pass, it is a very popular place to take your children, well, at least it was. Since the homeless have moved into the park it had become a haven for illegal drug activity which resulted in drug paraphernalia being left throughout the park. Residents of Grants Pass complained to the City Council about this problem and the issue of being harassed by the homeless people that took up camping in the park, so the city started to enforce the no camping ordinance which resulted in it going to the SCOTUS.
Until they reach your neighborhood.Finally the madness is ending.
With what money?If they are going to set up camp they need to do so legally. Every town has a designated area where camping, at least temporarily, is allowed. Often these are camp grounds just outside of town, and often these camp grounds require a small payment for the services they provide.
People who set up camp in public parks, where they are not allowed to camp, should be arrested and their property confiscated. They can spend the night in jail and then pay an even bigger fine when they are eventually released. Nobody gets to violate the law with impunity, not even the homeless.
No, Riverside Park is in downtown Grants Pass. It's a beautiful park, created over a 100 years ago.Is that where the I-5 Rest Area is? One time we tried to stop there late in the evening and we couldn't even find a parking spot. lots of questionable cars there.
Finally the madness is ending.
They are not going to be jailed.Because throwing them jail at an expense of 40,000/yr is sanity.
No one is going to be punished.Because punishing someone for being unable to afford housing will cause them to afford housing?
This bullshit is not worthy of further comment. Do you feel better? Hate is a drug. A very addictive one.Nah. This is just good old fashioned dumbassed conservative mean-spiritedness. It's about seeing a group of the other hurt. You guys don't want solutions. You just want groups that you can punch down at, to feel that you are intrinsically better than.
Supreme Court allows Oregon city policy that punishes homeless people for sleeping on public property
The justices ruled that ordinances in Grants Pass do not violate the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishment.www.nbcnews.com
What are they supposed to do...squat?
They are not going to be jailed.
No one is going to be punished.
You just can't set up a tent and squat on public land. If you do, then you will be asked to move along. If you don't then your tent will be confiscated.
This bullshit is not worthy of further comment. Do you feel better? Hate is a drug. A very addictive one.
Like I posted before, Grants Pass has a city ordinance of no camping in the city park, this ordinance has been in effect since the 1950's and it applies to everyone. Just because you are homeless doesn't give you the right to break laws. Now if Grants Pass want to sit aside city property to allow the homeless to camp, that's up to the city. This however, comes with a lot of issues, who's going to clean up the mess they leave, because they sure in the hell don't clean it up. This is a huge issue all over Southern Oregon where the homeless make their camps, they leave trash everywhere, even when trash bins are provided you'll find trash piled up at empty trash bins. I don't know what the answer is for this problem, but camping at city parks is not the answer.Because throwing them jail at an expense of 40,000/yr is sanity.
Because punishing someone for being unable to afford housing will cause them to afford housing?
Nah. This is just good old fashioned dumbassed conservative mean-spiritedness. It's about seeing a group of the other hurt. You guys don't want solutions. You just want groups that you can punch down at, to feel that you are intrinsically better than.
What?
There is simply no other explanation for wanting to get rid of all programs that could possibly help a poor or broke person, intentionally not providing sufficient housing, and then punishing them for not having housing they can afford. And as a bonus, they might squat somewhere, and then you can faux-morally rage about that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?