• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Suggestion: allow a topic in two sub-forums when it fits both

Status
Not open for further replies.

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
57,990
Reaction score
29,425
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Sometimes, a topic has a clear link to two sub-forums, with a different discussion available for each. For example, this came up with reporting of a state's intelligence agency able to place agents widely in US media organizations - fitting both the 'Media bias' and that country's sub-forums, one for the media topic and one for the foreign policy topic. Posting in just one sub-forum would deprive one of the two discussions. Currently that is viewed as "spam".

Another example might be if, say, it were found the NRA had bribed multiple media outlets affecting the passage of a gun control bill, in the media bias and gun control forums. It doesn't come up much, but sometimes a topic has different parts.
 
The definition in the rules of spam would already seem to allow the above, but enforcement is applying the above to the rule.

"2a. Spam Posting – What constitutes spam posting can be but is not limited to the excessively
repeated posting of a meme within a thread or across many threads or excessively repeated
posting of cut/past responses within a thread or across many threads. Excessive and obnoxious
reposting of the same content degrades the quality of the thread and makes
arguments/discussion difficult. "

Certainly it's not "excessively repeated posting of a meme within a thread or across many threads" or "excessively repeated cut/paste" - indeed, the threads had different comments, the repetition being one video reporting the evidence linked in both, and not "excessively repeated cut/paste". It wasn't "obnoxious reporting of the same content" that "degrades the quality of the thread" - indeed, no repetition in the thread - or make discussion difficult in any way.

There's a good case the definition doesn't need to be changed, but enforcement would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom