Executive order will be set aside by first woman who challenges it in court. Wondering what he really got
Health Care: LIVE Updates On Vote Today
If all he wanted was an executive order, he's an idiot.Did he sell out or get the agreement he wanted? How do you know otherwise?
If all he wanted was an executive order, he's an idiot.
The executive order isn't worth the paper it's printed on. It doesn't over-ride a bill signed into law... so is Stupak just stupid or is he a sell out? The latter ... but we already knew Democrats have no spine so this shouldn't be a surprise.
An executive order is the equivalent of used toilet paper.
Stupak just sold his soul to the devel. Or....his new Messiah.
:rofl
Cry me a river.
40 states are about to sue the federal government. LOL
Good luck with all that.
What will be will be. Can't stop frivolous lawsuits from happening.
When the vast majority of ATTORNEY GENERALS in the country file suit, it's not frivolous, buddy.
The government can not force you to buy a product. Period.
Well, first that has to happen, and second, frivolous is frivolous no matter who fills. The person filing isn't what makes something frivolous or not.
The executive order isn't worth the paper it's printed on. It doesn't over-ride a bill signed into law...
What is so frivilous about pointing out that The Constitition can not usurp states rights and FORCE people to buy a product.
Pretty much a slam dunk case, though it'll probably take two years worth of appeals until it reaches the Supreme Court.
... and we all know two wrongs make a right!And yet, that is exactly how Bush and Cheeney used executive orders to ignore laws passed by Congress, and signed by Bush, to ignore the Constitution to authorize torture and strip us all of our rights to privacy! :doh
What is so frivilous about pointing out that The Constitition can not usurp states rights and FORCE people to buy a product.
Pretty much a slam dunk case, though it'll probably take two years worth of appeals until it reaches the Supreme Court.
... and we all know two wrongs make a right!
:roll:
Yup, that's the sort of CHANGE Obama brought to the White House, I guess.Nope. But hardly new, and hardly different.
You mean like auto insurance?
But nice change in topic. Don't mind the change, but nice to slip it in.
Not the same thing at all. The government can't force you to buy a car. That is a privilege.
They are going to force people to buy healthcare, or face a fine. They're hiring 16,000 additional IRS agents to enforce it, too.
True, but the concept is the same. If you have a car, you are forced to buy insurance. Nuances aside, they are still forcing you to purchase something or face consequences. It really is similar.
No, you buy insurance based on the PRIVILEGE of being able to drive on public roads and as insurance that you could could damage another person's property or person, not to mention your CAR, which the bank may actually own.
That's totally different.
This is being forced to buy a product because you are basically....alive. This is no different than forcing someone to buy a car.
They're hiring 16,000 additional IRS agents to enforce it, too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?