• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to delivery driver burned by hot coffee

Allan

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
50,482
Reaction score
74,309
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This award will no doubt be reduced on appeal.

Ouch!

New YorkCNN —
A jury in California on Friday ordered Starbucks to pay $50 million in damages to a delivery driver who was severely burned by an improperly secured lid on hot beverages.

Michael Garcia was picking up drinks at a drive-through in Los Angeles when he “suffered severe burns, disfigurement, and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals when hot drinks ultimately spilled” onto his lap, according to the lawsuit filed in California Superior Court in 2020. The lawsuit accused Starbucks of breaching its duty of care by failing to secure the lid.

 
Starbucks got deeper pockets than MacDonald's?
 
Starbucks got deeper pockets than MacDonald's?
US juries aren't much fussed about a company's ability to pay.
 
$50 million? Did John Holmes burn his dick off with this coffee?
 
California - a strangely litigious state. It seems to me that the only one responsible for the burns is the one who spilled the coffees. Why was the delivery driver riding with them in his lap? It would be fun to be the defense attorney on this case.

He wasnt. It's in the article, what happened.
 
Here we go again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants. Cue a lot of people who do not know either the facts of the case, or the arguments , or understand the actual damages involved or the legal theory behind punitive damages, or the judicial process post jury verdict, to pass amateur hour opinions on the state of tort law all across the country.

That one verdict absolutely saved a hell of a lot of consumers from a hell of a lot of third degree burns.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom