DemonMyst
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Messages
- 727
- Reaction score
- 299
- Location
- Seattle WA.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So far science has found no biological component in DNA or anything else.
Yes it does, it is even critical of the earlier data. It also does not support a physical cause for homosexuality, only accounts for differences in twins for many things, and why a 10% difference can be present.
You are reaching for straws Winston.
Yes it does, it is even critical of the earlier data.
The problem with your arguement is it also applies to being hetrosexual as well.. Which invalidates your arguement from the start.. It is the same mechanism that makes some people hetrosexual, that also makes somke people homosexual.. Being homophobic is a choice..
Intersex people have no physical gender.. Yet they are still female or male and attracted to either female or male.. Without a physical gender for you to examine.. who is gay and who isn't??
This is to someone else.. Anal sex has no bearing on being gay or not.. Some men like it and some don't.. Some women like it and some don't.. Anal sex is pretty common in the porn industry so it pretty safe to say it is popular in society.. There is no connection to anal sex and homosexuality.. To make that claim is idiotic at best.. For some couples, anal sex is the cheapest and most natural form of birthcontrol..
But your likes and dislikes are different than other peoples.. In the end.. That is all we are talking about here.. Likes and dislikes.. There is no right or wrong.. Just like being homosexual isn't an issue of right or wrong.. If nobody can say you are wrong for disliking anal sex.. Then you can't say someone is wrong for liking it.. That is simply how it is..
I said it applies to all sexuality. WTF does that have to do with being homophobic????
We are not talking about rare conditions or birth defect's.
How did we go to anal sex??? I did not say anything about it???
Sorry, missed the question. I support human rights....I don't think that being gay gives you specific rights.
If your going to normalize the abnormal for one small group then you can expect other abnormal groups to expect the same and they would have a "RIGHT" to feel that way.
A single person loving their parents is very much the same thing when it comes to passing on your social security and covering them with health benefits and tax breaks.
How about discrimination based on Polygamy, or Incest...please...its NOT GENDER...its about them wanting to benefit share at a cost to other taxpayers and being afforded special treatment not afforded to other abnormal groups...
The slippery slope fallacy ignores the concept of legal precedent. As it stands, in most places, it is illegal for two the same gender to enter into a legal marriage agreement. There are a number of situations were it would be beneficial for such a an agreement between two people (or more) that is currently illegal. For example, two old widows could cohabitate and enjoy the legal benefits that a SSM or CU would allow. I could "marry" my sister and adopt her children so that they could receive the medical benefits that my job provides....there's plenty of legal situations that allowing SSM would set a precedent for...
That doesn't matter. Homosexuals are asking for a right that no-one else has, because they are homosexuals.
Of course I do....no other group is allowed to marry someone of the same gender. Equality is a two way street.
It allows diseased individuals another means of pretending they're normal. If fulfills their denial and prevents them from seekin much needed assistance.
Not if marriage just becomes a way to get certain legal benefits. If one of my buddies is having financial trouble, I could "marry" him and put him on my insurance or whatever.
I heard of an incident awhile back where two guys got kicked out of a restaurant for making out. I have to admit, it would make me totally uncomfortable to see that.
I have known way to many that do. It just amazes me how people don't want to see it.
See that is just it, I never said "all gay men."
Please explain to me why when someone says "many" or "a majority" people on this issue or race always, every time jump to "all?"
How do you know? Or are you just guessing because you think you have an all knowing in to my life?
It doesn't exclude gays. :shrug:
They have the same right I do.
So Multiple marriage is different, but Same sex marriage is not different?
It has everything to do with "knowing they have been gay" so you can remember being gay at 3????
Please. A study was posted recently that children raised in a lesbian household was more likely to be gay. What does this tell you?
Actually if you ask him he will say that is not true. I showed him the study and allot of us debated at length about it. Like anything else it had advantages and that was (what some consider) a disadvantage.
That borders on hate speech. You're saying there is no logic or evidence behind a sociological norm or folkway simply because it has religious clothing. I'm quite disappointed you chose such an ignorant point of view.
In point of fact the taboo against sodomy in scripture is supported with data on the spread of STDs, as well as other physical ailments such as greatly increased occurrence of urinary tract infection and, over time, developing the drip.
Looking down on sodomy is hardly uniquely religious. There are plenty of heteros and non-religious who do not have anal sex for those reasons.
People didn't just sit down and make this **** up one day.
You and I have nothing left to discuss here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?