• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Special Master, Neutral, Unachievable!

Sand Castle

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
7,137
Reaction score
3,670
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
 
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
Well, we certainly don't know who the FBI and DOJ are anymore, so let's at least level the field.
 
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
So you also don’t believe that an unbiased jury could ever be selected?
 
an unbiased jury can be selected based on what is not known which I'm sure is a tremendous amount of facts.

making a wrong decision is most certainly the greater concern. the judge screwed up.
 
A jury does not need top secret clearances...
A jury is made up of diverse ideas, when given evidence they deliberate, debate the case amongst each other.

Special Master- one person, one preconceived ideas
 
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
They'll either have to agree (not gonna happen) or the judge selects them. I don't really trust this judge but I'll give her a chance
 
No person can legally see classified info without security clearance.

Trump has caused us a very big problem.
It’s an interesting problem. Dare the DOJ charge and prosecute Trump for a crime knowing that they’ll have to give security clearances to randomly selected people in order to argue the case?
 
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
It'll be fun to watch the two sides and the judge try to find someone.

In the meantime, all we are going to get out of the DOJ is made up nonsense...like a staged photo and lies about documents.

Don't worry...you'll still eat well on their nothingburgers.
 
No person can legally see classified info without security clearance.

Trump has caused us a very big problem.
Actually, it was the corrupt DOJ who caused the problem. But that's okay...they don't really want to indict Trump. There won't be a need for a jury.
 
They'll either have to agree (not gonna happen) or the judge selects them. I don't really trust this judge but I'll give her a chance
If Judge was willing to go far enough to create an Executive Priviledge argument at her level of justice, she will most certainly place someone to carry her water
 
If one honestly, unbiasedly thinks through the process of selecting a neutral Special Master, one would come to the conclusion: Unachievable.

Does someone knows this person?
There’s many of us that don’t love nor hate Trump. I don’t know if that qualifies as neutral or not. But it’s true. Many don’t understand the left’s or the right fixation with Trump. We’d just like for him to go away, retire someplace never to be heard from again. Whether or not Trump is indicted, sent to jail or walks free is totally irrelevant to wanting a Trump free political arena.

I let you be the judge whether or not that meets your definition of neutral. We want Trump out of the public eye, so perhaps that isn’t neutral. But we don’t have Trump Phobia in the love or hate class.
 
It'll be fun to watch the two sides and the judge try to find someone.

In the meantime, all we are going to get out of the DOJ is made up nonsense...like a staged photo and lies about documents.

Don't worry...you'll still eat well on their nothingburgers.
It's sad that I read your comments and just shake my head. It must be hell living in your world where everyone is plotting against your idol.
 
I wonder how the left would respond to someone like Alan Dershowitz...a man that is a committed democrat, who voted against Trump, and who supports democrat candidates...appointed as a special master to review the documents.
 
So you also don’t believe that an unbiased jury could ever be selected?

If they could select one for Charlie Manson they can probably select one for Donald Trump. Although Manson didn't have as many followers.
 
Back
Top Bottom