- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Abort! Stop the Republican Party From Growing, one baby at a time....Vote pro-choice. Vote DNC.
was it because he was so far behind after the last debate
or was it that most of the debate was on economics and domestic policies
or was it because even when Romney stumbled on Libya and was tripped up by a moderator who got the facts backwards, the record is so bad for Obama he cannot make it up
Anyone else see that?
Fox reported 46% of undecided voters thought Romney won, so I looked up the source they cited (Source), looks like it was written on October 4th and about the first debate. So I say, well maybe I was wrong, maybe I didn't find the source Fox cited. So giving Hannity the benefit of the doubt, I go to Fox's website and find this poll (Source #2).
Source #2 is not a link to Fox News.
How not? Fox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Videos, click the Fox Insider at the top right and see where it takes you.
Obama lost me w/ supporting a renewal of the "Assault Weapons" ban.
as if you were voting for him anyway. I'm glad Obama will revisit "Assault Weapon" Ban for good.
It struck me, that when that question came up, Obama didn't have the faintest clue what he was talking about. Neither did whoever formed the question. Some lady asked about Obama having pledged to “Keep AK-47s out of the hands of criminals”, and asked what Obama has done toward that purpose. Obama went on to talk about AK-47s and automatic weapons, and “assault weapons”, in a manner that made it painfully clear that he had no clue about what any of these terms were suppose to mean, or what the present legalities were concerning them.
Romney picked up in a manner that demonstrated that he had considerably more knowledge of the subject than Obama did, but he really wasn't interested in talking about gun control.
The highlight, for me, of the portion of the debate which I saw, was when Romney went on from there to discuss the terrible impact that the destruction of the family has had on society, the importance of a man and a woman being married before they have children, and how this failure leads to the sort of crime and violence that those on the left want to “solve” with such useless measures as gun control.
I expected to come on to this forum tonight, and find several threads condemning Romney for these remarks, for how “bigoted” and “narrow-minded” they show him to be; but he was absolutely right in making these remarks. The undermining and destruction of the family is almost certainly, in my mind, the single overwhelmingly biggest cause of nearly all of the social ills that we face in this time. It was refreshing to see Romney standing up for this important principle.
Oh, and if you really cared about improving families you'd be for SSM. I figured that's where you were getting at.
No, I most certainly would not. “Same sex marriage” is a direct attack on the family, and is just the latest manifestation of the very sickness that is responsible for the destruction of the family and the social ills that result therefrom.
No, I most certainly would not. “Same sex marriage” is a direct attack on the family, and is just the latest manifestation of the very sickness that is responsible for the destruction of the family and the social ills that result therefrom.
No, I most certainly would not. “Same sex marriage” is a direct attack on the family, and is just the latest manifestation of the very sickness that is responsible for the destruction of the family and the social ills that result therefrom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?