There is noting to see here other than that maybe Putin wanted Trump, which might just mean that he wanted to help us get our heads out of our asses because he needs help running the world.
Him and the Chinese.
If it's enough to cast such doubt on the election that it should be invalidated, or to sway the Electoral College, why should Hillary's "popular vote" win not also be in doubt?
Did this make sense in your head?
We dont care because their is zero information that voting machines were hacked. If the Russians did anything they provided us with information, and nobody can prove that they even did that.
There is noting to see here other than that maybe Putin wanted Trump, which might just mean that he wanted to help us get our heads out of our asses because he needs help running the world.
Him and the Chinese.
So you are all for a do-over then?
There's no evidence, of course, that any Russian "hacking" had any effect on the election at all.
But if it did -- if a campaign of propaganda, leaks, and disinformation affected the vote -- then Hillary's "historic" vote total, and "popular vote victory," is just as questionable and illegitimate.
Now THAT'S some truly bizarre spin.
Does it in Yours?
Now THAT'S some truly bizarre spin.
So you are all for a do-over then?
Trusting the Chinese or Putin is a fools errand. Thought You would know that.
You doubt that Trump will be sharing the world with Russia now? Putin has raised his status immensely by putting his puppet in the White house. Expect a systematic unraveling of our relations with any countries that oppose Russian aggression.
No Trust is needed here I should think, we dont even know that the Russians did anything.
You doubt that Trump will be sharing the world with Russia now? Putin has raised his status immensely by putting his puppet in the White house. Expect a systematic unraveling of our relations with any countries that oppose Russian aggression. Putin has a green light all the way to rebuilding the USSR.
No Trust is needed here I should think, we dont even know that the Russians did anything.
The point of that post blew right past you, didn't it? That's OK; there was a follow-up:
What evidence could there be that would satisfy you?
So, find out and put the issue to bed. Common Sense 101.
What evidence could there be that would satisfy you?
Just present the evidence. If it's valid, and Harshaw denies it still, then that's on him.
The only evidence I've seen so far pertaining to this issue, is Russian trolls being hired on the internet.
That is not justice, you cant just haul everyone you want into court to roll the dice trying to get them, you need to produce probable cause for that.
There is none here so far.
This is a Slime Trump operation by the looks of it.
So you support the investigations but think it is wrong to actually do so? Oky Doky.:roll:
Just present the evidence. If it's valid, and Harshaw denies it still, then that's on him.
The only evidence I've seen so far pertaining to this issue, is Russian trolls being hired on the internet.
The only evidence which could possibly warrant a re-do of the election would be solid proof they hacked vote totals. There is none at all. The election was free, fair, and above board. People voted the way they voted.
Whatever chatter the Russians may have added to the miasma of campaign noise was no different from any domestic offerings of the same.
Just present the evidence. If it's valid, and Harshaw denies it still, then that's on him.
The only evidence I've seen so far pertaining to this issue, is Russian trolls being hired on the internet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?