• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So how is that "Smart Power" working out?

How is "Smart Power" working out for the United States?


  • Total voters
    21

Again you are wrong. What you're doing is attacking education. If you go back and look at definition of an academic (a noun) it is one who teaches. You try to hide your contempt of learning by fudging the definition something most don't meet.
 
Sounds better than an academic and the fact that they are a professional in one area means they put their intellect to work and are people that do, not people that hypothesize. They have my vote as they are defined by you.

I don't know how you think it is better than an academic who is a specialist in a field and tries to have their ideas tested and applied. The negative stereotype of the intellectual is one who is outside their comfort zone, but by sheer virtue of being known in one field (with Noam Chomsky it is linguistics) believes it is thus possible for them to influence the elite and the popular conception of another area (in Noam's case it is frequently foreign policy), despite not having any experience whatsoever and proposing lofty ideas with no grounding in reality.
 
"lofty ideals with no grounding in reality" now there's a recipe for disaster
 

Education is good, Smart is better, Leadership is best.
 
"lofty ideals with no grounding in reality" now there's a recipe for disaster

It's based on a stereotype of an intellectual. I don't always buy into it, but I don't agree with Noam's ideas either.

That being said, I have to say I have heard a lot of the same qualities from the average citizen, on a variety of issues. One has academic credentials, the other does not, but they both can sound the same.
 
"lofty ideals with no grounding in reality" now there's a recipe for disaster

It is possible to have lofty ideals and still be grounded in reality. You can't get to the moon unless you reach for the stars.
 
I don't call Lobbin' a few cruise missiles into Syria smart lofty or intellectual In my CONservative playbook its just plain DUMB
 
I don't call Lobbin' a few cruise missiles into Syria smart lofty or intellectual In my CONservative playbook its just plain DUMB
I wouldn't be at all surprised if a few went off course and landed in Texas, or maybe even near the governor's mansion in Arizona. One could have my name on it, or worse, "to whom it may concern".
 
According to the poll, smart power has screwed us. Maybe we should consider converting smart power into a combustible fuel.
 
According to the poll, smart power has screwed us. Maybe we should consider converting smart power into a combustible fuel.

We need to alert AP to your suggestion! He's interested in energy independence for this Country! :lamo:
 
We need to alert AP to your suggestion! He's interested in energy independence for this Country! :lamo:
I am too, and the nice thing about smart power for fuel is that the ads are already written, virtually. I admit it's going to be hard to cram Krugman into a fuel tank, but what the heck, I'm willing to give it a try.
 
I am too, and the nice thing about smart power for fuel is that the ads are already written, virtually. I admit it's going to be hard to cram Krugman into a fuel tank, but what the heck, I'm willing to give it a try.

You've got multiple likes on this idea! :thumbs: :lamo:
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…