• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sneak preview of the perhaps coming soon Vance/Thiel presidency

Craig234

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
59,524
Reaction score
30,400
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
JD Vance will never be elected President.

The only way he'll ever be President is if Trump dies in office, and even then, I doubt he'd make it to the end of the term if there's anymore than a year left at that point.
 
The vice president of the United States hosting a podcast vowing to destroy violent leftist organizations that don’t exist.

This is normal.
 
I find the glee over the prospect of a Vance candidacy interesting and, frankly, a bit narrowminded.

Something to consider: Trump didn't beat the Democrats in two of three races because swing voters think he's someone of high character. They didn't vote for him because he helped incite a riot on Jan 6. They didn't vote for him because, even by Washington standards, he's incredibly dishonest. They didn't vote for him because he's crude, rude, and a p-grabbing womanizer. Think it through. They voted for him despite all of these things.

So our friends on the left may want to ask why? It may be that his policies -- while certainly not my brand of conservatism -- are popular enough with voters that they can overcome the concerns raised by, let's face it, the most flawed major party nominee we have ever seen.

Now, what happens when someone without all that baggage runs on those policies?
 
NatMorton said:
Something to consider: Trump didn't beat the Democrats in two of three races because swing voters think he's someone of high character. They didn't vote for him because he helped incite a riot on Jan 6. They didn't vote for him because, even by Washington standards, he's incredibly dishonest. They didn't vote for him because he's crude, rude, and a p-grabbing womanizer. Think it through. They voted for him despite all of these things.
Click to expand...

I disagree. They voted for him because of those things.

They support his actions. Especially the one and done voters. Republicans are going to miss those guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom