• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should we have a congressional disability amendment?

Should we have a disability amendment for Representatives and Senators?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • No

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Total voters
    14

I would guess Representative Gifford's constituents already have a mechanism to replace her but have chosen not to at this time. Am I wrong about that?
 
I would guess Representative Gifford's constituents already have a mechanism to replace her but have chosen not to at this time. Am I wrong about that?

As far as I know, there is no mechanism for disabled Representatives and Senators.

The closest thing there is is recall elections. But those are more done for corrupt officials or to unseat officials who became too unpopular before the end of their term.

But neither of those apply. Giffords is not corrupt and she is still popular. However, she is still too physically disabled to execute the powers and duties she was elected to perform on behalf of her constituents.

So I think there should be some kind of mechanism in place for members of Congress who are not corrupt and are still popular but suffer from some kind of disability that prevents them from serving their position they were elected to.
 
Vote of temporary appointment maybe?
 
Lets have an amendment to ban sale of guns to mentally ill teabaggers and we won't need to have this discussion.
IMO, this will help., but as long as conservatives love guns and the liberals fear a loss of votes.....
Something, how England was able to dis-arm their police 20 years ago....
Anyway, I think this is a state by state thing, not federal...and if a state is "happy" with "short one man" representation, then, as usual, nothing will be done..
 

It appears it will be resolved by May:

"Mr. Rogers acknowledged that nobody was certain what Ms. Giffords would decide between now and May, when her nominating papers to run for re-election are due. “If she decided she wanted to do something else,” he said, “it would be a wide-open race.”

“The voters may be trying to calibrate the trajectory of her recovery, where will she be in March or June or September,” Mr. McNulty said. “But, personally, I think none of that matters. I am not intimidated by that. The esteem in which she is held is so high that the voters will give her as much time as she wants. They will consider it is all up to her.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/us/politics/supporters-of-gabrielle-giffords-find-reasons-to-cheer.html
 

Except this doesn't resolve the issue if it happens again in a different district to a different Representative or Senator. And it doesn't address the fact that Arizona's 8th congressional district is being unrepresented in Congress.
 
Except this doesn't resolve the issue if it happens again in a different district to a different Representative or Senator. And it doesn't address the fact that Arizona's 8th congressional district is being unrepresented in Congress.

Perhaps, I'm not convinced however this couldn't be addressed through a recall election.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…