So it is fair to make hundreds of thousands of children suffer because their parents made a bad (or multiple) decisions? The children are the real people who pay the price, and it is not fair, they had no say in the matter, they did not force their mother to do anything yet they will be the ones that are most effected.
No, we just stop these worthless "parents" from having the kids before they have them. They get one shot. If they screw it up so horribly that they prove to society they are not fit to breed, we take the kid, put them with a family that can raise them properly, then we permanently sterilize the "parents" to stop them from ever loosing their faulty genes on society again. We should not, as a society, have to pay for people who are so utterly irresponsible that they kick out a unit every 9 months so they get more welfare money.
That is absolutely barbaric. How can any reasonable person believe that the government has the right to make that big of a choice for a person. It is not your choice it is not Washington's choice, it is the choice of the woman. Such an idea is overly invasive and extremely primitive, not everything revolves around you. Now, i do belief that welfare needs to be reformed, but nothing as drastic and unthinkably unconstitutional as this.
The government is the legislative arm of society, it is put in place by the people and given the ability to enforce social dictates. Anyone who is unable or unwilling to care for their offspring has no business having any. Enough with your absurd emotional whining, this is about responsibility and the utter lack of any by many welfare recipients.
Spitting out a unit every 9 months is not some imaginary-friend-in-the-sky-given right.
So it is the government's right to go against the wishes of women and terminate their ability to give birth? I am being 100% honest when I say this, this sounds like a punishment that the Taliban would use for women who were unruly, or gave birth to a child that was of no need to the cause. The idea of having a baby goes both ways, would you also be in support of "cleansing" any male who fathered a baby then left the mother and child out to dry. There are males who go around and continue to shoot out offspring then bounce to the next female they can take advantage of.
So it is fair to make hundreds of thousands of children suffer because their parents made a bad (or multiple) decisions? The children are the real people who pay the price, and it is not fair, they had no say in the matter, they did not force their mother to do anything yet they will be the ones that are most effected.
No, we just stop these worthless "parents" from having the kids before they have them. They get one shot. If they screw it up so horribly that they prove to society they are not fit to breed, we take the kid, put them with a family that can raise them properly, then we permanently sterilize the "parents" to stop them from ever loosing their faulty genes on society again. We should not, as a society, have to pay for people who are so utterly irresponsible that they kick out a unit every 9 months so they get more welfare money.
No, we just stop these worthless "parents" from having the kids before they have them. ...
I repeat:
Lets stop them before they have kids.
FRee Birth control will help stop unwanted pregnancies and/or unwanted children.
I repeat:
We shouldn't have to pay to stop them because they can stop themselves.
I repeat:
Lets stop them before they have kids.
FRee Birth control will help stop unwanted pregnancies and/or unwanted children.
I think You are being unrealistic.
Couples are not going to stop having sex and most of the inexpensive birth control products are very unreliable.
Poor couples need acess to long term effective birth control products so they do NOT become parents before they are ready to afford them.
They can have all the sex they want. THEY have to be responsible for the outcomes though, not me.
In that case about half of those with unwanted pregnancies will chose abortions.
Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions
Study: Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions - CBS News
In that case about half of those with unwanted pregnancies will chose abortions.
Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions
Study: Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions - CBS News
In that case about half of those with unwanted pregnancies will chose abortions.
Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions
Study: Free birth control leads to way fewer abortions - CBS News
No, it won't because most of the women who are having these kids are not using birth control and wouldn't, free or otherwise! What, you want us to go around and forcibly put it in as well?
Then why are you complaining? If they don't use it, then we, the taxpayers, aren't out any money, but if they do use it, then we still win because then they aren't having children they can't afford. Sounds win/win to me.
Oh, people are using them, just not the people who are doing us any good. You're just paying for people who can afford to buy it themselves.
I beg to differ. After my second was born, we were still waitin for hubby to go active duty, so I went on birth control, paid by medicaid. I know many girls who have done this. Paying for anyones birth control will help.
But unless you have a child, many women cant get on medicaid. Isnt it best to pay for it before that first or second kid, rather than catching them after?
Oh, people are using them, just not the people who are doing us any good. You're just paying for people who can afford to buy it themselves.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?