• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should racist WhatsApp messages land you in jail?

Should racist WhatsApp messages land you in jail?

  • Total voters
    22
A

Atreus21

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
1,386
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative

Ex-police officer jailed for 20 weeks over racist WhatsApp messages

James Watts was serving with West Mercia police in 2020 when he shared ‘grossly offensive’ material in group chat
www.theguardian.com

"A former police constable has been jailed for 20 weeks after sending a string of racist WhatsApp memes, including images that mocked the death of George Floyd.

James Watts was serving with West Mercia police in 2020 when he shared the “grossly offensive” material in a group chat, which included former colleagues at a Warwickshire prison.

After a police inquiry, the 31-year-old was found to have posted 10 offensive memes in May and June 2020, including one featuring a white dog wearing Ku Klux Klan clothing and another showing a kneeling mat with Floyd’s face printed on it."

If this were in the US, presumably this would be protected speech under the first amendment. Should it be?
 
In the United States, simply sharing a racist meme would be protected under the 1st Amendment and should be. There are very limited exceptions to that, but based on the little provided in the article, I don't see that being an exception to the 1st Amendment.

However, while criminal punishment would not be warranted in America, that doesn't mean this person could not suffer repercussions such as loss of job, becoming a social pariah, etc.
 
I Voted 'Yes' here, but it needs a little bit of motivation.

If, the law states that racism can land you in jail, then this should be applied to WhatsApp messages or any other form of communication as well. So the reason I voted 'Yes' is simply because I think racism should land you in jail, regardless of whether this was verbally or by WhatsApp. Now I do not know if Racism can land you in jail or not, and this varies greatly from country to country.

Anyways, my 5c worth.

Joey
 
so, you're not for the 1st amendment then.

so progressive, King George III would be proud of you.
 
The cop should be fired but not arrested.
 
On itself no, but if he was sharing racist memes that called for violence against minorities for example those would be "racist memes" that I could see there being an argument for.

That said, the issue there legally would be the violence informed by the racism and not the racism directly.
 
Atreus21 said:
If this were in the US, presumably this would be protected speech under the first amendment. Should it be?
Click to expand...
Yes.

But I assume that most websites would delete those memes.
 

Of course. Losing his job seems like a no-brainer. But jail time? Certainly not. That's power the government should not have.
 
Slyfox696 said:
In fairness, his location is listed as Thailand. So he probably doesn't care.
Click to expand...
he could be an american citizen. you never know these days, with all the travelling and foreign work and all
 

The poll question does not match the bolded above. The answer to the bolded above question is yes, but the answer to the poll question is no.
 
DarkWizard12 said:
he could be an american citizen. you never know these days, with all the travelling and foreign work and all
Click to expand...
Possibly, but the wording of his post does appear to be consistent with a non-American.
 
DarkWizard12 said:
so, you're not for the 1st amendment then.

so progressive, King George III would be proud of you.
Click to expand...
So you think American laws should apply in every country in the world.
Sounds good, turn the whole world into dysfunctional societies where half the population hates the other half.
 
It depends on the nature of the 'racism'. If the message advocated violence a jail sentence might be appropriate, otherwise not.

We live in a world where the word 'racist' is now thrown around on the whim of the speaker. Strange as 'races' do not even exist. To maintain that they do is simply to reiterate long disproven junk science.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
The poll question does not match the bolded above. The answer to the bolded above question is yes, but the answer to the poll question is no.
Click to expand...

That's fine, just make your response the poll pertinent only to the poll question, and (if you wish) answer the bolded question in your normal comments.
 
DarkWizard12 said:
so, you're not for the 1st amendment then.

so progressive, King George III would be proud of yo,
Click to expand...
DarkWizard12 said:
u.
Click to expand...
Hi Dark Wizzard,

I am all for the 1st amendment, but not if it is being used to degrade people. A good thing should not be used to do a bad thing. In this case, what needs to be determined is whether their was racist intend. If that is the case, than the defendant should not be able to hide behind the 1st amendment.

And that does not have anything to do with being progressive. But then again, and I mean no disrespect here, but where I come from we refer to your 'extreme left' as 'center' to 'center right', so it is probably not productive to have this discussion here. Besides, it is not the topic.


Joey.
 
Being a klukker automatically makes it impossible for one to do their job in a fair manner.
 
DarkWizard12 said:
he could be an american citizen. you never know these days, with all the travelling and foreign work and all
Click to expand...
Hi DarkWizzard,

Exactly my point. I am Dutch though. But there are a lot of Americans living in my village here.

Joey
 
Atreus21 said:
Of course. Losing his job seems like a no-brainer. But jail time? Certainly not. That's power the government should not have.
Click to expand...

Hmm… how does one lose their government job without that being a result of government power?

That seems to indicate you think ‘free speech’ should have consequences from the (powerful) government, but short of being jailed.
 
Atreus21 said:
That's fine, just make your response the poll pertinent only to the poll question, and (if you wish) answer the bolded question in your normal comments.
Click to expand...

I have done both.
 
Slyfox696 said:
Possibly, but the wording of his post does appear to be consistent with a non-American.
Click to expand...
Hi Slyfox,

Yep, not trying to hide my identity, but that is not good enough.

Do you think that just because I am not American that I do not care about the constitution of the most prolific country in the world? That's a little naïve now, don't you think?

Joey
 


whats a racist message? who decides?
raist "ALONE" no threats or planning violence?

the answer is absolutely not
that being said there always could be other repercussions, lost of employment, friends etc

in some circumstances, I think some jobs should have conduct clauses (detailed and specific) and it should be certain that you lose your job (yes this already exists but I'm saying I support it and it should be more common)
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Hmm… how does one lose their government job without that being a result of government power?

That seems to indicate you think ‘free speech’ should have consequences from the (powerful) government, but short of being jailed.
Click to expand...

I'd say losing a job is not a criminal penalty like jail time is, even if your employer is the government.
 
Atreus21 said:
I'd say losing a job is not a criminal penalty like jail time is, even if your employer is the government.
Click to expand...

I agree, but it is still government power being exercised in response to (protected?) speech alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…