• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Should P2P programs be illegal? [filesharing]

Should P2P programs be illegal?

  • Yes - they are the reason files are shared illegally

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • No - the program isn't the problem, the people are

    Votes: 11 84.6%
  • Maybe - it depends on how they are sharing the files [elaborate in post]

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Opinion not available [elaborate in post]

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    13

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
13,941
Reaction score
8,399
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Source: Netimperative

 
A change of course by the Supreme Court could have devastating effects. Not only would it stop P2P trading (illegal AND legal) but it could outlaw many now legal devices such as the VCR, TiVo, iPod, etc. If the decision trumps previous ones.

Moreover, I've got musician friends that put up there works on eMule, Limewire, etc to get more exposure. They own their copyrights and are distributing their product as they see fit. That’s just one example of how it’s not all piracy.

Thirdly, precedent has already been set in the “Betamax Case” Due to the fact that record sales are up as well as P2P usage, I’m not sure how the RIAA can prove economic harm.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…