- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 72,277
- Reaction score
- 36,066
- Location
- Rolesville, NC
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
So I've been thinking about this a little because I do defend transgenderism with evidence that it could be that at least some transgendered people are in fact intersexed, but should not have to share this.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I like how she talks about allowing intersexed people being allowed to choose intersexed or some variant to recognize themselves as who they feel they are. It is only our own problems with accepting things outside the norm which leads us to seeing them as having an issue that we need to fix, to choose one of the "norm".
I will say that I do not think that it is just Christians who reject those that are intersexed, or at least the idea that they should be able to live life as both. I do believe that this is something that is more a cultural thing and part of human nature that simply should be examined and changed through conversations and reasoning as to why we should see choosing a sex for intersexed children as wrong.
As I have pointed out, she points out here, intersexed people represent 1-2% of the population. As a comparison, those with natural red hair make up about 1-2% of the population.
And this leads to a second question, should parents be prevented from choosing a sex/gender for their child at birth?
Interesting question. There's some ease in picking a gender, because the child has to have a name. Names are often gender specific (you won't meet many girls named Charles).
If the parents are good with a gender neutral name, then i don't see why a gender should be chosen. I think either choice is valid.
So I've been thinking about this a little because I do defend transgenderism with evidence that it could be that at least some transgendered people are in fact intersexed, but should not have to share this.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I like how she talks about allowing intersexed people being allowed to choose intersexed or some variant to recognize themselves as who they feel they are. It is only our own problems with accepting things outside the norm which leads us to seeing them as having an issue that we need to fix, to choose one of the "norm".
I will say that I do not think that it is just Christians who reject those that are intersexed, or at least the idea that they should be able to live life as both. I do believe that this is something that is more a cultural thing and part of human nature that simply should be examined and changed through conversations and reasoning as to why we should see choosing a sex for intersexed children as wrong.
As I have pointed out, she points out here, intersexed people represent 1-2% of the population. As a comparison, those with natural red hair make up about 1-2% of the population.
And this leads to a second question, should parents be prevented from choosing a sex/gender for their child at birth?
It depends on the physical realities. Mostly male then lean male at first, if female visa versa. Thats play by ear call really. Catch as catch can.
So I've been thinking about this a little because I do defend transgenderism with evidence that it could be that at least some transgendered people are in fact intersexed, but should not have to share this.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I like how she talks about allowing intersexed people being allowed to choose intersexed or some variant to recognize themselves as who they feel they are. It is only our own problems with accepting things outside the norm which leads us to seeing them as having an issue that we need to fix, to choose one of the "norm".
I will say that I do not think that it is just Christians who reject those that are intersexed, or at least the idea that they should be able to live life as both. I do believe that this is something that is more a cultural thing and part of human nature that simply should be examined and changed through conversations and reasoning as to why we should see choosing a sex for intersexed children as wrong.
As I have pointed out, she points out here, intersexed people represent 1-2% of the population. As a comparison, those with natural red hair make up about 1-2% of the population.
And this leads to a second question, should parents be prevented from choosing a sex/gender for their child at birth?
I'm not sure why a name would really matter more than the psychological health of the child, which research lately has shown would benefit from, at the very least, the truth about being born intersexed and being able to choose for themselves if they go through hormonal therapy (when it isn't absolutely necessary, and in most cases of intersexed, it isn't).
The most interesting thing (and hypocritical) about it is that many people are against hormonal therapy for transgender children to let them match their stated identity, but few seem to even care that many intersexed children are given such hormones, truly unnecessarily, at birth (or around that time) just because the parents want to choose their sex/gender rather than allowing them to simply be intersexed, both.
So I've been thinking about this a little because I do defend transgenderism with evidence that it could be that at least some transgendered people are in fact intersexed, but should not have to share this.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I like how she talks about allowing intersexed people being allowed to choose intersexed or some variant to recognize themselves as who they feel they are. It is only our own problems with accepting things outside the norm which leads us to see them as having an issue that we need to fix, to choose one of the "norms".
I will say that I do not think that it is just Christians who reject those that are intersexed, or at least the idea that they should be able to live life as both. I do believe that this is something that is more a cultural thing and part of human nature that simply should be examined and changed through conversations and reasoning as to why we should see choosing a sex for intersexed children as wrong.
As I have pointed out, she points out here, intersexed people represent 1-2% of the population. As a comparison, those with natural red hair make up about 1-2% of the population.
And this leads to a second question, should parents be prevented from choosing a sex/gender for their child at birth?
So I've been thinking about this a little because I do defend transgenderism with evidence that it could be that at least some transgendered people are in fact intersexed, but should not have to share this.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I like how she talks about allowing intersexed people being allowed to choose intersexed or some variant to recognize themselves as who they feel they are. It is only our own problems with accepting things outside the norm which leads us to seeing them as having an issue that we need to fix, to choose one of the "norm".
I will say that I do not think that it is just Christians who reject those that are intersexed, or at least the idea that they should be able to live life as both. I do believe that this is something that is more a cultural thing and part of human nature that simply should be examined and changed through conversations and reasoning as to why we should see choosing a sex for intersexed children as wrong.
As I have pointed out, she points out here, intersexed people represent 1-2% of the population. As a comparison, those with natural red hair make up about 1-2% of the population.
And this leads to a second question, should parents be prevented from choosing a sex/gender for their child at birth?
I thought gender and sex were different things. How are parents choosing gender for their child they're only choosing the sex of their child?
Unless gender and sex are connected
Why choose at all though? Why can't we just accept people as both male and female, regardless of how much of one or the other they resemble?
I thought gender and sex were different things. How are parents choosing gender for their child they're only choosing the sex of their child?
Unless gender and sex are connected
Who decides what bathroom these intersexed persons can use? Maybe that sounds frivolous, but because there are people who would try to abuse this ambivalence-- think, this transgender guy in this salon-- the state has to think about such matters.
Care to address the topic?
And those that aren't okay with the sex chosen for them at birth? What about them? Those who want to choose a sex later are still free to do so.People are against hormonal therapy for “transgender” children because the research shows that the majority of such children no longer hold that view after puberty. The research also shows that the majority of intersex persons are happy with the sex chosen for them at birth. So what problem are you trying to solve?
Why should they not choose their own bathroom? Who has any right to police them?Who decides what bathroom these intersexed persons can use? Maybe that sounds frivolous, but because there are people who would try to abuse this ambivalence-- think, this transgender guy in this salon-- the state has to think about such matters.
And those that aren't okay with the sex chosen for them at birth? What about them? Those who want to choose a sex later are still free to do so.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
By physically changing them to represent a certain sex physically they would be choosing their sex. By raising them as a certain gender, girl or boy, they would be choosing their gender.I thought gender and sex were different things. How are parents choosing gender for their child they're only choosing the sex of their child?
Unless gender and sex are connected
They can be related without being the same thing.I'm addressing inconsistency. In one side of the argument gender and sex aren't the same but others it is.
So I'm questioning that. The topic is gender and sex and how they related to one another.
Yeah that's the common rhetoric which is why I asked what I did in response to this.Parents are not choosing sex and gender. Sex and gender are not the same things.
So the question is, should parents be encouraged to choose a sex for an intersexed child, and therefore a gender for them in those early years (that may change), at birth?
I think the best approach is to leave them alone. That decision is for the child to make as they mature.If a child is intersexxed then that is to be left blank,. Drs are not to be performing surgery and making a critical life decsion for a child when their physical genitalia is ambiguous at birth because of the problems that have been created in the past when that has happened.
As I said, they should be left alone. In other parts of the world the children born with such defects are left alone and often develope into male or female in early stages and even sometimes during puberty.No person looks at their birth certificate to know if they are male or female. That idea is innate to the person and lifelong problems are created when a Dr makes the wrong decision or performs genital surgery on a newborn because of their own opinions.
What is intersex? | Intersex Society of North America
So how are parents choosing gender when they are choosing sex?They can be related without being the same thing.
So how are parents choosing gender when they are choosing sex?
That is worse for them than simply having all choose their sex later in life, even giving them the option to simply be intersexed, not either Male or female.The small minority who aren’t can elect to change it in adulthood. I don’t believe that the exception should be the rule. There’s really no reason such a rare phenomenon should be given this much attention in the first place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?