- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Should foreign diplomats get immunity from crimes?
"Common" crimes. Non-political. Everything from parking tickets to murder.
Keep in mind that if we would/could eliminate immunity for them, other countries would do the same for our diplomats.
Should foreign diplomats get immunity from crimes?
"Common" crimes. Non-political. Everything from parking tickets to murder.
Keep in mind that if we would/could eliminate immunity for them, other countries would do the same for our diplomats.
Should foreign diplomats get immunity from crimes?
"Common" crimes. Non-political. Everything from parking tickets to murder.
Keep in mind that if we would/could eliminate immunity for them, other countries would do the same for our diplomats.
Should foreign diplomats get immunity from crimes?
"Common" crimes. Non-political. Everything from parking tickets to murder.
Keep in mind that if we would/could eliminate immunity for them, other countries would do the same for our diplomats.
No they should not get any immunity.If our citizens where in other countries committing crimes they wouldn't get any immunity and our diplomats shouldn't be out committing any crimes. If countries want to use bull **** religious laws against our diplomats then we can cut ties off with that country of bomb them into submission.
If you believe that I said we should bomb countries I do not like then you are a uneducated piece of foreign trash,see I can play that game too. I have no problem with diplomats being charged and arrested for actual crimes should they commit actual crimes on foreign soil. However if they go arrest my country's diplomats because they do not wear a burka, bring chewing gum into a country, be a homosexual, carries a firearm for protection and so on then it should be seen as a act of aggression and that country no longer wishes to continue relations with my country.So I could care less if things get worse in that country.Preferably instead of wasting money sending diplomats to other countries the meetings should be done skype or some other similar service and televised live(I do not believe meetings between countries should be secret).I'm sure you're joking, but in case you're actually this uneducated, I should point out that bombing places you don't like often makes problems worse, and often doesn't work out very well anyway.
Those diplomats should be arrested.US diplomats who got away with abuse - Times Of India
If you touch diplomatic immunity, your diplomats will be among the first to get burned.
Hypocrisy and double standards.
Those diplomats should be arrested.
Of course the answer is 'no'.
Civilians have to obey the laws when they go to other countries - so should diplomats.
If the diplomats are so stupid that they cannot remember the laws of the country that they are stationed in - then don't send these morons there to begin with.
And if they don't want to obey the laws while they are there - then again, don't send these whiny babies in the first place either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?