Should a male victim report a sexual assault to police, if the perpetrator is a woman?

[guillermojf]

I was watching a video from a female critic about a famous woman who allegedly sexually assaulted a man. The sitting man was unconscious, probably from alcohol or something, and the woman allegedly stood over him, kissing him with her hand apparently on his crotch. There was even a short video clip showing the event.

At first, I thought it wasn't a big deal. But then I realized that she could've given him an STI while he was unconscious. So yeah . . .

Maybe reporting to police is "overboard," but it would be evidence if I had to sue for a severe STI. I am not paying for STI treatment for something that I did not consent to get.

 

[TheParser]

NO!

The woman may make false accusations against the male victim!

And the police -- especially in 2021 -- know that they had better take the woman's side.

As the saying goes, the male victim should just "suck it up."

In 2021, equal treatment no longer exists.

Certain groups now have special treatment.

That's just how the cookie crumbles.

 

[bongsaway]

I went with yes, my reasoning, play misty for me.

 

[maquiscat]

I was watching a video from a female critic about a famous woman who allegedly sexually assaulted a man. The sitting man was unconscious, probably from alcohol or something, and the woman allegedly stood over him, kissing him with her hand apparently on his crotch. There was even a short video clip showing the event.

At first, I thought it wasn't a big deal. But then I realized that she could've given him an STI while he was unconscious. So yeah . . .

Maybe reporting to police is "overboard," but it would be evidence if I had to sue for a severe STI. I am not paying for STI treatment for something that I did not consent to get.

Should? Yes, of course. Will it be believed? Doubtful, and that is a major problem. Especially since there is the myth that men cannot be sexually assaulted or raped by women.

 

[gulfman]

"Officer,she raped me.I feel so cheap and dirty and satisfied"

 

[maquiscat]

"Officer,she raped me.I feel so cheap and dirty and satisfied"

And this is exactly that myth that I talked about.

 

[Lisa]

NO!

The woman may make false accusations against the male victim!

And the police -- especially in 2021 -- know that they had better take the woman's side.

As the saying goes, the male victim should just "suck it up."

In 2021, equal treatment no longer exists.

Certain groups now have special treatment.

That's just how the cookie crumbles.

Is this satire or merely shockingly stupid? I can't tell.

 

[btthegreat]

Do the questions get harder?

 

[Grand Mal]

NO!

The woman may make false accusations against the male victim!

And the police -- especially in 2021 -- know that they had better take the woman's side.

As the saying goes, the male victim should just "suck it up."

In 2021, equal treatment no longer exists.

Certain groups now have special treatment.

That's just how the cookie crumbles.

Well that's pretty dumb.

 

[maquiscat]

Well that's pretty dumb.

Sadly there is a kernel of truth to it. We have seen where woman will make false accusations. Duke Lacrosse team case for example. And we sadly have yet to truly get out, as a whole, of the mindset that a man cannot be raped, especially by a woman. We apply the myth that if a man gets an erection or orgasms he must have wanted it even more so than the one that if a woman gets wet or orgasms during a rape then she actually wanted it. When it comes to sexual assaults, the only case we want to accept is that of man on man, and even then we seem to limit that to a prison environment.

 

[Nilhus]

There's no such thing as "sexual assault" - this is an ambiguous propaganda term, that almost always - if real(very rarely) - the deed is no more than groping(which should not be a criminal issue at all)

 

[Irredentist]

There's no such thing as "sexual assault" - this is an ambiguous propaganda term, that almost always - if real(very rarely) - the deed is no more than groping(which should not be a criminal issue at all)

Of course groping someone should be a criminal issue. Nonconsensual sexual contact is unacceptable under any circumstances.

 

[maquiscat]

There's no such thing as "sexual assault" - this is an ambiguous propaganda term, that almost always - if real(very rarely) - the deed is no more than groping(which should not be a criminal issue at all)

It's ignorant statements like that in which learning what really happens would be the perfect karma. Any unwelcomed forceful touching is an assault. Sexual assault would be assault that has sexual components to it, and goes all the way up to and includes rape. All rape is sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape. So unless you are claiming that rape doesn't exist, then you are foolishly wrong in sexual assault not existing.

 

[Nilhus]

Of course groping someone should be a criminal issue. Nonconsensual sexual contact is unacceptable under any circumstances.

It's ignorant statements like that in which learning what really happens would be the perfect karma. Any unwelcomed forceful touching is an assault. Sexual assault would be assault that has sexual components to it, and goes all the way up to and includes rape. All rape is sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape. So unless you are claiming that rape doesn't exist, then you are foolishly wrong in sexual assault not existing.

You have been indoctrinated by feminist propaganda to believe some really stupid and wrong crap.

Groping should NOT be a criminal issue, as there is NO VERIFIABLE, OBJECTIVE HARM caused! Period. That's not "sexual contact". In lots of European countries this wasn't(and in some probably still isn't) a crime and everybody was/is OK(for example, Germany only a few years ago incriminated this, largely due to american/conservative propaganda in the media)

Rape on the other hand includes two things: deprivation of liberty combined with forced sexual penetration(which can lead to physical harm). That's what rape/sexual assault(yeah, this term should never refer to anything else). Any other uses of these words are abusive and should be severely punished!

And oh yeah, the vast majority(>99%) of allegations of rape are false(ZERO valid evidence)! Because women get away with such false complaints, so they're used as revenge tools against men. This is a super huge problem in much of the western world, but one day it'll be fixed and feminists and their supporters will pay a heavy price.

 

[Irredentist]

You have been indoctrinated by feminist propaganda to believe some really stupid and wrong crap.

Groping should NOT be a criminal issue, as there is NO VERIFIABLE, OBJECTIVE HARM caused! Period. That's not "sexual contact". In lots of European countries this wasn't(and in some probably still isn't) a crime and everybody was/is OK(for example, Germany only a few years ago incriminated this, largely due to american/conservative propaganda in the media)

Rape on the other hand includes two things: deprivation of liberty combined with forced sexual penetration(which can lead to physical harm). That's what rape/sexual assault(yeah, this term should never refer to anything else). Any other uses of these words are abusive and should be severely punished!

And oh yeah, the vast majority(>99%) of allegations of rape are false(ZERO valid evidence)! Because women get away with such false complaints, so they're used as revenge tools against men. This is a super huge problem in much of the western world, but one day it'll be fixed and feminists and their supporters will pay a heavy price.

Touching someone sexually without their consent necessarily involves a deprivation of their liberty. And it can also result in embarrassment, humiliation, and psychological trauma. These are verifiable harms, and therefore meet the criteria for criminality.

 

[HonestJoe]

As a general principle, a victim of sexual assault should report it to the police (and/or other responsible authorities). Everything else is the question is irrelevant detail.

 

[Lisa]

Touching someone sexually without their consent necessarily involves a deprivation of their liberty. And it can also result in embarrassment, humiliation, and psychological trauma. These are verifiable harms, and therefore meet the criteria for criminality.

He seems to be a supporter of grabbing women by the p***y.