No it's not irrelevant, you can't actually prove conclusively that someone is having sex unless they volunteer the information willingly which she did by applying for maternity leave, she violated the contract end of story. Oh and just where did you come up with the idea that a contract is only valid if it is continiously enforced under zero tolerance guidelines?
Actually, he's right. In the corporate world you have a Hell of a time firing someone on an issue like this if it hasn't been previously enforced.
Then why even have contracts?
An employer has the right to review his employees work performance whenever they want, if that performance is found to be lacking then he has the right to fire her, that would include excessive absenteeism and lateness.
The reason is obvious, IE that she violated her contractual agreement.
Um if she requested maternity leave then she volunteered the information that she violated her contractual agreement to abstain from sex while under there employ, see ya later.
Oh I see a contractual obligation means absolutely **** all to you. Why even have contract terms then?
Understand contracts are not binding unless they are continiously enforced under strict zero tolerance guidelines. Interesting, bull****, but interesting none the less. A contract is a contract, she violated the contract, she was in the wrong, the employer had every right to fire her.
Then why even have contracts?
Here's the story:
FOXNews.com - Fla. Christian School Fires Teacher Over 'Fornication' Claims
What do you think? Poll will follow...
Everybody commits a sin at some point. We always do. If teachers at Christian schools were to be fired every time they committed a sin there would be no teachers.
Why have contracts if an employee can be denied the leave to which they are contractually entitled, unless they have a 100% perfect record at work for the entirety of their employment? :roll:
You have no understanding of corporate law whatsoever. Just because something is in writing doesn't make it legally binding. The employer's own actions indicated it wasn't a problem. He can't then go back and fire her when it's inconvenient for him. This isn't just some random legal theory, this has been established law for decades.
How can you be entitled to a leave which comes about directly from violating your contract?
Understood, a contractual agreement means absolutely nothing unless a zero tolerance policy is implemented 100% of the time for any and all infractions.
Agent Ferris said:She violated the contract and now you want her to be granted a payed vacation as a direct result of violating that contract. :roll:
Christian schools exist to educate childern in a Christian environment. I am sorry, but pre-martial sex is not a Chirstian value. To allow this would dilute the very essence of Christian education, which is exactly what the parents are expecting of the school. To not fire her would be hypocrisy. That said, I am certain many to most Christian schools are guilty of double standard or uneven application of Christian standards, that is not an argument against her firing.
I would advise against her filing a lawsuit that will not go in her favor but instead cost her a lot of money.
To argue to your direct point: intentional or not, she did do something to harm the school.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?