Sheli Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

MOM: “let’s not forget my client didn’t even testify at the hearing that frustrated Judge Lester. It was the fact that HIS WIFE did not acknowledge that they had about $130,000 in a legal defense fund that they did not know what it was to be used for. Could she have been more honest? That is for another person, a judge, and quite honestly it’s you Judge. That has nothing to do with my client.”

Zimmerman Hearing-Pt. 7 - YouTube

GZ: "Till death do us part, or if I get in serious trouble and need to use you as a scapegoat"

http://i46.tinypic.com/t8mgia.jpg

:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

hawke812 said:

MOM: “let’s not forget my client didn’t even testify at the hearing that frustrated Judge Lester. It was the fact that HIS WIFE did not acknowledge that they had about $130,000 in a legal defense fund that they did not know what it was to be used for. Could she have been more honest? That is for another person, a judge, and quite honestly it’s you Judge. That has nothing to do with my client.”

Zimmerman Hearing-Pt. 7 - YouTube

GZ: "Till death do us part, or if I get in serious trouble and need to use you as a scapegoat"

http://i46.tinypic.com/t8mgia.jpg

:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo

Click to expand...

I find the commentary on the video to be quite annoying and biased. I just couldn't make it through more than 2 minutes.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

How idiotic.

She wasn't hit by a bus or even thrown under a bus.

O'Mara relayed what was factual.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

Chaddelamancha said:

I find the commentary on the video to be quite annoying and biased. I just couldn't make it through more than 2 minutes.

Click to expand...

I agree it is annoying, could not find a better link to that part though.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

Excon said:

How idiotic.

She wasn't hit by a bus or even thrown under a bus.

O'Mara relayed what was factual.

Click to expand...

More ad homs:roll:

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

hawke812 said:

More ad homs:roll:

Click to expand...

Wrong.

If I said you were idiot, that would be an ad hom.
Saying that something you provided is idiotic is not an ad hom, because it is not personal.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

hawke812 said:

MOM: “let’s not forget my client didn’t even testify at the hearing that frustrated Judge Lester. It was the fact that HIS WIFE did not acknowledge that they had about $130,000 in a legal defense fund that they did not know what it was to be used for. Could she have been more honest? That is for another person, a judge, and quite honestly it’s you Judge. That has nothing to do with my client.”

Zimmerman Hearing-Pt. 7 - YouTube

GZ: "Till death do us part, or if I get in serious trouble and need to use you as a scapegoat"

http://i46.tinypic.com/t8mgia.jpg

Click to expand...

You may be the only person on this topic who does not realize that George Zimmerman did not testify at the hearing. Then hysterically laugh at your own lack of even basic knowledge.

I understand you our one of those people who believe wifes are merely slaves of their husbands for which any action by the wife then is considered action by the husband. Whether you believe in going as far as Tigger or now isn't clear in your messages. However it is clear by your messages that you believe that women and wives have no independent mind and are strictly prohibited from saying or doing anything with her husband's consent.

Overall your message makes no sense anyway. You can not separate between personalities. ANYONE names "Zimmerman" is the same person to you in your messages. Trying to distinguish between the wife, mother, George, father is something your messages draw no distinction between. It's bizarre.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

Excon said:

How idiotic.

She wasn't hit by a bus or even thrown under a bus.

O'Mara relayed what was factual.

Click to expand...

It appears to be a fake topic line to grab attention to himself. What is factual is abhorent to him in his messages. Not liking reality, the alternative for some is to make one up that is exactly opposite from the truth.

George Zimmerman did not testify at the hearing. Hawk thinks he did, so starts this bizarre thread on that lack of even the most basic knowledge of events. :doh

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

Excon said:

Wrong.

If I said you were idiot, that would be an ad hom.
Saying that something you provided is idiotic is not an ad hom, because it is not personal.

Click to expand...

You just said "how idiotic", not "the information you provided is idiotic". You left it open to interpretation, so either/or could very well be true.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

hawke812 said:

You just said "how idiotic", not "the information you provided is idiotic". You left it open to interpretation, so either/or could very well be true.

Click to expand...

No! How idiotic.
Or if you prefer ~ How ridiculous.
When calling a person an idiot the other does not say "how idiotic".
The word "how" in no way refers to a person.
If it did you would now be saying that I called you a ridiculous. ??? Which of course makes no sense.

Re: Shelie Zimmerman ran over by bus!!!

joko104 said:

It appears to be a fake topic line to grab attention to himself. What is factual is abhorent to him in his messages. Not liking reality, the alternative for some is to make one up that is exactly opposite from the truth.

George Zimmerman did not testify at the hearing. Hawk thinks he did, so starts this bizarre thread on that lack of even the most basic knowledge of events. :doh

Click to expand...

When did I say he did?