I used to know how to make origami rabbits, but I forgot.
Origami can help but Risperidone's a better bet.
Hey dude. I know you think your mish-mash of words is ok because "rules" are stupid and all that. But you have to know the rules before you can break them. If you don't, you just come off as being incomprehensible. I break rules all the time, yet I am plainly fluent in English. That's because I know the language well, and I know what rules I can break and still be understood (and sometimes understood better than if I'd followed them).
But several people here wonder if English is your second language. Or if you have something ticking over in your brain that's muddling your ability to communicate. Or if there is simply no message at all in anything you write.
This is the first time I've tried to actually read an entire post you've written. Keep in mind, I'm a writer. The English language is what I do, and I can understand the English language even when it's been severely mutilated by the person using it.
But I have no idea what you're talking about.
You can call me a language fascist or whatever, but that's like telling me that 2+3=4 is just as correct as 2+2=4. It's not. 3+1=4, and the square root of 16 is 4. There are many different ways to get to 4. But 2+3 will never equal 4.
If you want to be understood, I suggest you learn the rules. Then you can think about breaking them.
And once you've done that, I will attempt to parse why you think orgami is the key to enlightenment. But I have the feeling your thought process is just as garbled as your writing.
This is priceless. Do not compare literal truths with figurative ones. That is like comparing theory to theology. Most people are educated to think in linear patterns. We are taught length, width, and height is 3 dimensions and that is all there are to consider while defining ideas, memories, images.
But there are two more that make consciousness aware of 4 dimensions of existing to where each result has 6 halves around it's center. Now I am talking about real physical results, not theory or theology while the substance of every symbol is inclusive of what I am talking about.
Those two extra things never added within length, width, height are depth, and density. Philosophies are two dimensional, like pictures, images in a mirror, pages with words they are images from within the rememberence of educated reciting in standardized sounds and symbols of letters and numbers for a common means to have a discussion.
But take the meta off physical, remove ity of real and human and let us talk purely in gender representation of the human population. Then there are no people as a collective ideology of self casted characters following a notion of national identity of politics ruling the body and spiritual;ism edcuating the idea characters are righteous and genders are the lowest form of being human.
Now I have attached a picture again, to the core of each result at each level of compounding having the same principles to each principal result from the
1. atom.
2. of compounding molecule,
3. molecular elements of the periodic table.
4. planets and all things revolving around a star of a solar system,
5. the whole solar system within a galaxy,
6. all galaxies of the sole moment universally here being exactly as they appear.
Now back to the attached origami figure as it refers to step 4.
The whole in the middle is Earth's core. The top point is this planets top electromagnetic polarity and the bottom point is this planets bottom polarity where during each solstice the seasons are opposite of one another.
Second, the points one the left and right are representative to dawn and dusk where during equinoxes both the top and bottom halves have equal daylight and night times in the opposing seasons again.
third. the front and back points are symbolic to noon and mid night not midnight. This sepates the dawn half and dusk half tradionally called east and west, but what is east and west if dawn dusk noon and midnight never move and the migration of the molecular masses of combined elements in gaseous, liquid, and mineral are compounding to include both the ground we walk on, the water we drink, the air we breath, and the food chaint that holds every ancestry of every memeber of the food chain from proteins bacteria to the human form exactly as it is functioning now it did every previous generation and every future generation combined.
four, substance that is this planet remains of this planet. Again, I am not speaking about maybes, mights, coulds, woulds, shoulds, if onlys, and only ifs. I am speaking about the physical results within each body of each lifetime of each result without showing any preferences over which is syuperior or inferior because of intellect, intelligence, or instinctive ability.
You are a master of the language, but have you figured out now as is, it is self contained, self maintaining and always here, now while every shaped formed results shapes and forms each next generation in very specific naturally balancing actions that technology can mirror but not replace.
I discovered the core to every philosophy's physical substances symbolized by metaphors of syllables. I do not know every detail ever conceived but I do understand how and why they were a conception to the whole of what is here now by the same means it works everything else universally.
You have every fact of theory and theology that protects reality on your side of the debate. I only have the physical absolutes that makes every fact substantively incomplete by design by those in governance of separating a species of two genders to beleive they can be anything ther than what they are between conception and dead of their sole existence passing through the eternity of now and here when here and now in the exact order of conception to conceiving works the inception of the species spanning generations of lifetimes until extinct from the food chain that made the inception by simple compounding interest as we are what we eat and what eats us.
Ashes to ashes and dust to dust. I gave up on philosophies as they only direct me to ignore the self evident so those teaching me I cannot know make sure I never find out by how language arts never defines anything specifiically other than what people believe in regards to no body can know real completely.
Is this Stephen Hawking?
Can somebody tell me why I should give a **** about any of this
?
No, I myself think the Stephen Hawkins thing is a hoax. Even if it isn't, he is lost in a theory time changes everything here never staying the same details conceived twice from snowflakes to each sole lifetime added to ancestry of a male female species.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?