- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 31,089
- Reaction score
- 4,384
- Location
- The greatest city on Earth
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
There are many constitutional rights stripped away from those in jail. Why is the religion clause any different?
I am not the one who is arguing that the Constitution of the United States is basically worthless.
Which part of the Constitution to you believe is being violated?
read the thread. heck, just read this page.
read the thread. heck, just read this page.
Having a politician say "bless you" when somebody sneezed at a Press Conference would probably set off a 30 page thread on seperation of Church and State around here.
What I'm seeing is that there are some posters who appear to believe that the government is trying to establish a religion, though the name oof that new religion has yet to be mentioned..
Have they stopped teaching about US Constitution in American schools? What's going on?
Having a politician say "bless you" when somebody sneezed at a Press Conference would probably set off a 30 page thread on seperation of Church and State around here.
What difference does it make? Since when are convicts guaranteed Constitutional rights? It's a bad idea because it's too lenient, but I don't view this as a Constitutional issue.becauase the Establishment Clause is the only part of the Constitution that is relevant in this case.
What difference does it make? Since when are convicts guaranteed Constitutional rights? It's a bad idea because it's too lenient, but I don't view this as a Constitutional issue.
Since when are convicts guaranteed Constitutional rights?
Since when are they not?
Then I must be wrong.holy schmeg, I actually agree with you on something.
What I'm seeing is that there are some posters who appear to believe that the government is trying to establish a religion, though the name oof that new religion has yet to be mentioned....
question: is the reason this is a bad idea because it is unconstitutional or is it just a bad idea?
What difference does it make? Since when are convicts guaranteed Constitutional rights? It's a bad idea because it's too lenient, but I don't view this as a Constitutional issue.
Since when are they not?
ah, a legitimate question.
the answer: both.
This is clearly and comically unconstitutional.... but that could be easily remedied by the substitution of other activities for non-religious persons or people whose faith is not represented in the area (say, Sikhs.)
this is clearly a bad idea because criminals belong in jail, not in church.
this is clearly a bad idea because criminals belong in jail, not in church.
Since inmates can't bear arms or vote.Since when are they not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?