- Joined
- May 15, 2025
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 13
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Serious Issues in Soros’ Open Society IRS Filings – Criminal Exposure?
Hi all,
I’ve spent 25 years building and managing mid-sized companies with complex financials—and recently, I turned that scrutiny toward the Open Society Institute’s (OSI) public IRS filings. What I found just a few pages into their 2021 Form 990-PF is shocking enough to merit IRS revocation of tax-exempt status and potential criminal prosecution.
I’ll break down one key example—this is just from the first two dozen pages of a 660-page document.
What’s the Issue?
In 2021, OSI (EIN: 13-7029285) reported over $14.5 million in spending on a program called Open Society–U.S., claiming it as its largest charitable activity. The program’s stated aims include:
Yet, on Part VI-A of their 990 filing, OSI checked “No” to the following:
How is that possible? These denials directly contradict the program’s description. Under IRS law, these are statements made under penalty of perjury.
What Makes This More Concerning
What Needs to Happen
I believe there’s more here than a paperwork mistake. This warrants:
I Have Supporting Docs Ready
I’ve compiled:
I’m continuing to dig—this is just the beginning. Happy to share more with anyone interested in financial accountability, nonprofit law, or IRS enforcement.
Thoughts? Have others seen this kind of setup before?
Let’s hold these institutions to the same standard the rest of us live under.
Let me know if you want variations for specific platforms (like Reddit, Substack, or a watchdog site), or if you’d like a more concise version.
Hi all,
I’ve spent 25 years building and managing mid-sized companies with complex financials—and recently, I turned that scrutiny toward the Open Society Institute’s (OSI) public IRS filings. What I found just a few pages into their 2021 Form 990-PF is shocking enough to merit IRS revocation of tax-exempt status and potential criminal prosecution.
I’ll break down one key example—this is just from the first two dozen pages of a 660-page document.
What’s the Issue?
In 2021, OSI (EIN: 13-7029285) reported over $14.5 million in spending on a program called Open Society–U.S., claiming it as its largest charitable activity. The program’s stated aims include:
- Legislative advocacy
- Criminal justice reform
- Voting and election policy
- Civil rights campaigns
- Public policy influence (national, state, local)
Yet, on Part VI-A of their 990 filing, OSI checked “No” to the following:
- Line 1a: “Did the foundation attempt to influence any legislation?”
- Line 1b: “Did it participate or intervene in any political campaign?”
- Line 4: “Did the foundation spend more than $100 on political purposes?”
How is that possible? These denials directly contradict the program’s description. Under IRS law, these are statements made under penalty of perjury.
What Makes This More Concerning
- Open Society–U.S. isn’t a separate entity; it’s described like one, but it’s just a label within OSI—helping them avoid transparency.
- It’s framed as a direct charitable activity, which means no grant-level disclosure (Schedule I or F).
- The result: $14.5 million toward domestic political influence without any itemized accountability.
What Needs to Happen
I believe there’s more here than a paperwork mistake. This warrants:
- Full investigation by journalists and watchdogs.
- A formal IRS review for:
- Misuse of 501(c)(3) funds
- False reporting
- Failure to disclose political expenditures
- Possible criminal referrals for those who signed the return.
I Have Supporting Docs Ready
I’ve compiled:
- The original 990-PF (public)
- Highlighted contradictions
- Archival descriptions of the program
- A breakdown of IRS standards that may have been violated
I’m continuing to dig—this is just the beginning. Happy to share more with anyone interested in financial accountability, nonprofit law, or IRS enforcement.
Thoughts? Have others seen this kind of setup before?
Let’s hold these institutions to the same standard the rest of us live under.
Let me know if you want variations for specific platforms (like Reddit, Substack, or a watchdog site), or if you’d like a more concise version.