- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 33,407
- Reaction score
- 15,319
- Location
- daily dukkha
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
This screaming over banning books in Florida (and other states) schools is really a bunch of bullshit.Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."
"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.WARNING: Sen grills activist on graphic books in school libraries: 'What planet did you just parachute from?'
Senator John Kennedy challenges activist and Secretary Giannoulias on parental influence over library books, citing explicit content from controversial LGBTQ+ books.www.foxnews.com
One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.
"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."
Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.
"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.
Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.
"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.
Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
If the clownish scum of the American Right would just show a tiny bit of intellectual capability and sense of integrity and morality every once in a while...Kennedy is a clown.
What is the fascination of the gop with others sex lives? Why does the gop think they have the authority to dictate to others what's good for them and what's bad for them? If it's because they are claiming the moral high ground, just look at their number one choice for president, to tell you about their morals.Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."
"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.WARNING: Sen grills activist on graphic books in school libraries: 'What planet did you just parachute from?'
Senator John Kennedy challenges activist and Secretary Giannoulias on parental influence over library books, citing explicit content from controversial LGBTQ+ books.www.foxnews.com
One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.
"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."
Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.
"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.
Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.
"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.
Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
Yep.When we ban books in school before we ban guns, we admit we are more afraid of our children learning than we are of them dying.
Banning books is the stuff of the most ignorant societies.
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.What is the fascination of the gop with others sex lives?
Yep.The GOP has no policy platform beyond anti-abortion and anti-LBGTQ, ergo their "woke" crusade and banning books.
They're like little Nazis running around and tossing books onto a bonfire.
If you don't like what's on tv, change the channel, don't tell me I can't watch it. Insisting, really?Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
Yawn.Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
If you don’t like what the government has in stock for you to borrow then buy your own books.If you don't like what's on tv, change the channel, don't tell me I can't watch it. Insisting, really?
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."
"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.WARNING: Sen grills activist on graphic books in school libraries: 'What planet did you just parachute from?'
Senator John Kennedy challenges activist and Secretary Giannoulias on parental influence over library books, citing explicit content from controversial LGBTQ+ books.www.foxnews.com
One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.
"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."
Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.
"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.
Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.
"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.
Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
Banning bad books is a great thing.When we ban books in school before we ban guns, we admit we are more afraid of our children learning than we are of them dying.
Banning books is the stuff of the most ignorant societies.
Banning bad books is a great thing.
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."
"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.WARNING: Sen grills activist on graphic books in school libraries: 'What planet did you just parachute from?'
Senator John Kennedy challenges activist and Secretary Giannoulias on parental influence over library books, citing explicit content from controversial LGBTQ+ books.www.foxnews.com
One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.
"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."
Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.
"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.
Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.
"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.
Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill.,...
I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Who defines "bad"...............you??Banning bad books is a great thing.
Kids do not really matter...or really matter a lot...to those people.Do you have any source from reputable media?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?