• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Secret' Taliban talks under way

Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
13,417
Reaction score
8,288
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Western officials, the Afghan government and Taliban-linked mediators have been engaged in secret negotiations to bring elements of the group into Afghanistan's political process, Al Jazeera has learned.

The talks, which have been taking place in Dubai, London and Afghanistan since the beginning of the year, have proposed the return of Gulbaldin Hekmatyar, the former Afghan prime minister, who has been in hiding for seven years, to Afghanistan.

Hekmatyar is the leader of the Hezb-i-Islami forces, a faction of Afghanistan's Hezb-i-Islami party, and is purported to be in the northwest tribal region of Pakistan.

His forces fight alongside the Taliban and are considered a terrorist organisation by the United States forces in Afghanistan.

FULL STORY
 
Western officials, the Afghan government and Taliban-linked mediators have been engaged in secret negotiations to bring elements of the group into Afghanistan's political process, Al Jazeera has learned.

The talks, which have been taking place in Dubai, London and Afghanistan since the beginning of the year, have proposed the return of Gulbaldin Hekmatyar, the former Afghan prime minister, who has been in hiding for seven years, to Afghanistan.

Hekmatyar is the leader of the Hezb-i-Islami forces, a faction of Afghanistan's Hezb-i-Islami party, and is purported to be in the northwest tribal region of Pakistan.

His forces fight alongside the Taliban and are considered a terrorist organisation by the United States forces in Afghanistan.

FULL STORY

Al Jazeera????

The terrorist news network?

It wouldn't surprise me.

The Taliban is worse than Hamas. The Taliban need to be irradicated.
 
The Taliban is worse than Hamas. The Taliban need to be irradicated.

Im with you 100% brother.

Hamas look like UN peace keeping forces compared to those talibany wa*nkers.
 
Hi there my fellow americans! I´m from Sweden and I´m happy that your new president seams to be a human with a heart.
Just read in the newspaper about the prisoners at guantanamo who cenfessed their involvment in the 11´th of september attac. They also said that they where proud of it. Maybe can that sort of speachment couse some angry reactions among the american people! But then again the american soldiers involved in the Vietnam war seems to be proud to. The questions is: How can anyone be proud of killing freedomefighters, innocent people, bombing villages and raping and killing women and children, just to protect a dictatorship! If the Americans want to show the world that they are better than the talibans they´re gonna have to prove that by acting more human and admit their warcrimes in the past.
 
The Taliban is worse than Hamas. The Taliban need to be irradicated.

Not possible. Taliban and her offsprung ideas are going to stay for dinner, dessert, tomorrow's breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert, etc.
 
Not possible. Taliban and her offsprung ideas are going to stay for dinner, dessert, tomorrow's breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert, etc.

Agree! Love of humankind, accepting eachouter! Wheter black, white, liberal, socialist and no matter religion you deserve the right to live in peace. Freedom, democrasy, whether your conservative och sandinistas
 
Agree! Love of humankind, accepting eachouter! Wheter black, white, liberal, socialist and no matter religion you deserve the right to live in peace. Freedom, democrasy, whether your conservative och sandinistas

This is why hippies and peace lovers are screwed up. For as long as man has the ability to disagree with one another, war will always be about. It will never end, it always was, always will be, and neither will it ever go away. Some people are evil in nature, clever in nature, and like most man, greedy in nature. And that greed fuels wars and causes conflicts. Peace demonstrations cannot and will not change the nature of man.

Accept the world for what it is my swedish friend, and dont try and enforce peace onto everyone. It wont work. Not everybody wants peace.
 
This is why hippies and peace lovers are screwed up. For as long as man has the ability to disagree with one another, war will always be about. It will never end, it always was, always will be, and neither will it ever go away. Some people are evil in nature, clever in nature, and like most man, greedy in nature. And that greed fuels wars and causes conflicts. Peace demonstrations cannot and will not change the nature of man.

Accept the world for what it is my swedish friend, and dont try and enforce peace onto everyone. It wont work. Not everybody wants peace.


No, it is not "war" that will always exist it is "conflicts", "antagonisms" if you wish. America is a standard, and a representation that conflicts, and changes of power/political priority does not have to occur with violence and the use of force.
What's wrong with loving "peace". Conflicts still occur in peace-time.
 
Western officials, the Afghan government and Taliban-linked mediators have been engaged in secret negotiations to bring elements of the group into Afghanistan's political process, Al Jazeera has learned.

The talks, which have been taking place in Dubai, London and Afghanistan since the beginning of the year, have proposed the return of Gulbaldin Hekmatyar, the former Afghan prime minister, who has been in hiding for seven years, to Afghanistan.

Hekmatyar is the leader of the Hezb-i-Islami forces, a faction of Afghanistan's Hezb-i-Islami party, and is purported to be in the northwest tribal region of Pakistan.

His forces fight alongside the Taliban and are considered a terrorist organisation by the United States forces in Afghanistan.

FULL STORY

... So over the years, have there been efforts to talk to Hekmatyar, to talk to [Baitullah] Mehsud, to talk to Haqqani?

Uh-huh, yeah, and to different degrees. Hekmatyar is an example -- really not interested in having a discussion. And you also have to bear in mind that at some point, when you look at questions of justice, well, how far can you go in being willing to reach out and to engage with some of these actors? Many of them have been involved in some pretty horrific crimes.

I guess that's my question. How far can you go in talking to these guys?

That's a great question, and there is no specific answer. As an example, if Haqqani would come onside and give up bin Laden, would that be a good deal? Imperfect, but yeah, I would take it. ...

But we must, perhaps foremost in mind, be aware of the sensitivities and the needs of the people of that area. What are their views? What are their aspirations? What are their hopes? We can't really cut a deal and put these populations at future risk. There's a moral, I think, imperative for us, working with the Pakistani government, the Afghan government and those tribal societies.

So it's about protecting the U.S.; it's about nullifying Al Qaeda leadership, denying them safe haven, but not at the risk of those populations.

In other words, making a deal with Haqqani that assures his sort of safe haven and continued rule of the area if he's, in fact, a harsh dictator in that area?

That's right, because then you're not going to have an enduring resolution to the issues anyway. But how do you strike that balance? That's something that depends on lots of variables.

FRONTLINE: the war briefing: interviews: henry crumpton | PBS


Here is the best explanation I've read so far to explain the complexity of the situation in Afghanistan and how all the Taliban are not the same.

What do the Pashtuns think of the border?

The Pashtuns don't think much of the border. They go back and forth between it. I'll give you an example.

There is this Pashtun, Jalaluddin Haqqani, who's from the Khost-Miram Shah area. Khost is the Afghan side of the border; Miram Shah, North Waziristan, is the Pakistan side of the border. In the 1980s, back in the day when I was reporting on the mujahideen, Jalaluddin Haqqani used to give interviews to me and other journalists. He was the recipient of U.S./CIA aid. He was a big, fierce fighter against the Soviet occupiers of Afghanistan, and that's why we supported him.

Fast-forward a little bit: We neglected the region after the Soviets fell. We pulled out. Haqqani is a man of utter realism and pragmatism. He eventually allied himself with Al Qaeda, with Osama bin Laden. Haqqani stayed in the region, and lo and behold, he's now one of the most wanted people on the FBI files, or he's up there with the bad guys, all because of our neglect in a way. I don't believe that Haqqani, unlike other mujahideen leaders, was implacably anti-Western. I think he was out for the highest bidder, always.

But anyway, Haqqani and his troops -- and Haqqani is very sick now. His son is really in charge. Haqqani, I believe, has Parkinson's disease. Haqqani's people, his troops, which reputedly were involved in the Indian Embassy bombing in Kabul, move back and forth over this border as if this border doesn't exist. The border is their region of control essentially, both the Afghan side and the Pakistan side. And Haqqani is just one of these figures who's been around for 20 years or more and is a testimony to our neglect and, in [a] way, to our failure in the region.

The other is Gulbuddin Hekmatyar who, unlike Haqqani, has always been implacably anti-Western, implacably pro-Arab, pro-Wahhabi, pro-radical Saudi. Even in the 1980s he took money from the U.S. via the Pakistani intelligence people, but always was very clear in his hatred of the West. Hekmatyar has a presence in Kunar province near Nuristan. He has a presence in Logar province. In these places he's liked; he's respected by the people. He has real territory with tunnels, with tree cover. It's a place where bin Laden might theoretically [be in] hiding if he isn't on the Pakistani side of the border.

Then there's Abdul Razul Sayyaf, again from the 1980s, mujahideen leader, got support from the United States, but implacably anti-Western, implacably anti-American, implacably pro-Wahhabi, pro-radical Saudi, who is, again, still active.

So it's much more complex than just the Al Qaeda and the Taliban and the Karzai government -- the good guys and the bad guys, so to speak. There are a lot of players in this thing, and unless we start breaking off the pieces, dealing with some of the bad guys who are willing to be dealt with, if the price were right, we're not going to make progress.


FRONTLINE: the war briefing: interviews: robert d. kaplan | PBS
 
Last edited:
Nothing is wrong with loving peace. Just dont expect the world leaders to kiss and make up. Did i say there was anything wrong with peace? Most sane people do love peace, unfortunately alot of people who have a hand in world politics are not sane.
 
Last edited:
No, it is not "war" that will always exist

The last time anybody said that was WW1. Then WW2. The day war ceases to exist, please remember to PM me.

We always find something to fight about, and if we cant, we go on resource wars.
 
Last edited:
I´m not a hippie but I confess, I am a peacelover and perhaps a little screwed up to according to some people. Unfortunatly I must agree, the war don´t seem to end and history never seem to teach us the lesson that war don´t equal peace. Maybe there will always be evil and people like Stalin, Hitler, Reaga, Nixon, Hussein... and so on...
I do however hope for a better future where we can accept and understand eachouther better. I´m however think it way better that Obama is on the post as the most powerful man in the world instead of Bush.
I feel a little sorry for the americans thou becous of the majority-system in the states that more ore less makes it impossible for new parties to esstablish.
From a European point of wiew, the choise between demokrats and republicans is either to the right och even more to the right.
Great Brittain with the gouvermental socialist worker labourparty and outher socialdemokrats are large around Europe. There is also lots of different parties to choose between in the political areena. Is´nt that democrasy?
Kind of lost the tread there and maybe sounded a little patriotic, well sorry.
Maybe i come and visit your country some day. Question: Is there any boat from southern USA to Kuba? Or is there any flight? Me and a friend was thinking about a trip to Florida, Cuba then Jamaica or something like that.
 
Back
Top Bottom