I find it remarkable, really, that young people feel that simply because technology is growing into areas that allow people to surreptitiously be creeps as opposed to overtly being creeps, that suddenly being a creep is now okay and everyone just has to go with the flow and get used to it. A creep is still a creep, regardless of the method, period.
And maybe their putting your daughter through facial recognition algorithms in preparation for raping her, while looking up her address. Maybe you need to stop trying to bull**** your way through this debate, acting like it's all the same thing.
Yet you are fine with police officers being recorded and videoed during the commission of their duties.In Florida it is a criminal offense to do an audio recording of anyone unless they first give express permission to do so.
Until they actually do any of that, its called the 1st amendment. Oh, and it all can be done on a smart phone held in your hand. What is the difference?
And maybe their putting your daughter through facial recognition algorithms in preparation for raping her, while looking up her address. Maybe you need to stop trying to bull**** your way through this debate, acting like it's all the same thing.
I find it remarkable, really, that young people feel that simply because technology is growing into areas that allow people to surreptitiously be creeps as opposed to overtly being creeps, that suddenly being a creep is now okay and everyone just has to go with the flow and get used to it. A creep is still a creep, regardless of the method, period.
As long as the reason is not against the law, such as discriminatory, in WA St a business owner can ask someone to leave their business for any (legal) reason.
It's not breaking the law to enter with, say, no shoes or a gun or Google glasses, but to refuse to leave when asked is trespassing...which is a crime.
What other reason exists for wearing them? Did the article state he was NOT filming?You're assuming he was filming. Did the article state this?
Whats the difference of walking in with a news paper or magazine? I don't think you can be kicked out of a restaurant for reading a newspaper.This difference is the owner doesn't like it.
Oh, cant touch the sacred cows of race and sexual orientation.It's a private business, they can have such policies.
Don't understand why stories like this have to turn into massive outrages.
If it were me I'd just me like "Ooooooookay, I'll take my money elsewhere then".
Now this does not apply to innate traits such as being gay or black so don't be misunderstandin.
It's a private business, they can have such policies.
Don't understand why stories like this have to turn into massive outrages.
If it were me I'd just me like "Ooooooookay, I'll take my money elsewhere then".
Now this does not apply to innate traits such as being gay or black so don't be misunderstandin.
If any restaurant promises to toss any person out of their restaurant who talks on a cell phone, they'll get all of my business.
A guy pointing what is effectively a video camera at everyone continuously? Throw the bum out. If someone was continuously recording people with a cell or smart phone? Throw that bum out too.
Personally, I'd prefer a restaurant that prohibited people using cell phones inside. What to chatter with people not there? Go outside. Many basically shout into their phones - I suppose to make SURE everyone else hears.
I also think a business assuring privacy would be desirable to some people.
No, I'm not. But the same law that protects one protects the other. People who operate a business like a restaurant or a store are offering a general invitation to the public to come in and do business. The operator cannot revoke that invitation without cause. Neither race nor wearing a pair of classes constitute that cause.
The restaurant owner. Ridiculous to throw someone out over a piece of benign tech.
Good luck without a directional mic. Next.
Yet you have no problem with people videoing cops. Hmm.A guy pointing what is effectively a video camera at everyone continuously? Throw the bum out. If someone was continuously recording people with a cell or smart phone? Throw that bum out too.
Personally, I'd prefer a restaurant that prohibited people using cell phones inside. What to chatter with people not there? Go outside. Many basically shout into their phones - I suppose to make SURE everyone else hears.
I also think a business assuring privacy would be desirable to some people.
I got kicked out of Walmart as a kid cause my friends and I brought in a little camcorder. Didn't even do anything yet. Business owner can disallow the use of cameras on property.
I didn't say that the iphone came with Dolbe Surround Sound super hi-tech AccuraRecordingTM technology, but if I want to record you surreptitiously, your ass is getting recorded. Denying this is just silly. You want to pretend that the Google Glasses is somehow utterly unique recording technology, and I'm telling you you're living in a dream world. Seriously, just play around with your own smart phone some day next time you're in a public place and experiment with the recording technology -- you'll be surprised at how well you'll do.
Yet you have no problem with people videoing cops. Hmm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?