- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 16,763
- Reaction score
- 4,344
- Location
- Melbourne Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
It wasnt that partisan till you showed up. You came on this thread to do nothing but run to the defense of the gun banners in the thread.If you can not stay rational please don't respond to my posts. I am not interested in a partisan pissing contest.
where did I attack your post as irrational. I used it to note that deterrence of criminals has nothing to do with what motivates those who are calling for more laws that only impede honest people. Kids aren't legally allowed to own guns-let alone take them to school and shoot people. what laws would have stopped that? banning his parents from owning a gun before he did it?
What would you call significant? A total gun ban?Neither. None if these laws amount to anything significant.
It wasnt that partisan till you showed up. You came on this thread to do nothing but run to the defense of the gun banners in the thread.
Neither. None if these laws amount to anything significant.
What would you call significant? A total gun ban?
I suspect he will call the NEXT infringement insignificant. so at one point a gun ban would be significant but in a few years he'd hope it would not be
Wow, you just know what everyones intentions are better then they do and the value of other people based purely on their posts don't you. You're awesome.
I didn't say you attacked my post as irrational. I said your response was irrational.
Phrasing your response as you have here is not as partisan and petty as your previous effort. So, I was responding to something MaggieD posted.
I agree with you 100%. How do you suggest we address the mindset?
I don't think you have the credibility to determine what are minor infringements of a right you don't have much, if any, use for.
That is the ploy they love to engage. Oh, just this one little law. Then another, then another...........
I don't think you have the credibility to determine what are minor infringements of a right you don't have much, if any, use for.
When leaders of our nation speak words like ban and confiscation. We better listen. Its more than just talk.
Thanks to people like you, I purchased several and became quite efficient with them. They all hold more than 10 rounds.
I'm sure you don't, but I can think of a reason to care.
The point us hunters can still hunt, and people can still for protection, and very little in real life has changed. That equals minor.
Neither. None if these laws amount to anything significant.
Sure, just revamp the product line to bow to political pressure. Sounds oh so American. You said enough. You are the type that thinks we should be just allowed single shot rifles and one box of ammo per year. Thanks for showing your colors.
opinion noted and rejected as specious and dishonest. Those restrictions are all based on safety
none of the crap the Democrats have passed are aimed at criminals but rather people who don't violate substantive laws.
I can own a car that is faster than anything the cops have. so your analogy is moronic.
Being told how many rounds I can have to defend my home and protect my family is not minor. That is a slap in the face.I'm sure you don't, but I can think of a reason to care.
The point us hunters can still hunt, and people can still for protection, and very little in real life has changed. That equals minor.
And you won't be proficient with seven? Really?
Nothing to do with rights as pertains to automobiles. And I have gutted more cats and blacked out more windows than I can remember.
This may shock you, but some thought those restrictions were about safety.
Being told how many rounds I can have to defend my home and protect my family is not minor. That is a slap in the face.
Being told how many rounds I can have to defend my home and protect my family is not minor. That is a slap in the face.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?