Stating a fact is not anti anything.
Who? Law enforcement, prosecutors, judges. That is who. There are laws in almost every state on reasonable means to lock up guns and keep them from becoming tools of violence or used in a wrongful careless manner. Yet find me a parent of a kid that found daddys heater that is in jail right now for the charge of allowing junior to get to his gun.
I will say this, the gun is but a tool. An efficient tool. But just a tool. Our problems really are larger. It's not the tool, but the mindset.
No, they don't matter. It's just talk. None would dare actually do anything significant. Just won't happen.
Look at our prison system and you tell us, or is that too racist for you.
I agree with you 100%. How do you suggest we address the mindset?
Pretty minor? Really? Short of some smaller framed semi autos and older weapons like 1911s, most modern semi auto hand guns come with a minimum capacity of 10 rounds.
Are you telling me suppliers won't adjust? Do you really expect me to believe that?
Yes, minor.
I have never heard pro rights advocates call people to arms over a nut shooting kids in a school. At "worst" they argue that schools should not be a gun free zone where only killers are armed and thus will be able to kill innocents unchallenged.
the fact is-school shootings are incidents anti gun extremists LOOK FORWARD TO and crave in order to advance their disgusting agenda. Look at arch scumbag Feintard who had her anti gun schemes in the works for at least a year but waited until Newtown to unleash it.
SHE WANTS these sort of deaths because to the hysterical left, the end justify the ends and if a few kids die its ok as long as the hated NRA is punished.
No, they don't matter. It's just talk. None would dare actually do anything significant. Just won't happen.
I agree, and as long as people like that are willing to kill or rob others, the rest of us need to be able to defend ourselves from them. Anti gunners want to make sure people like that will face disarmed victims.
Looking at the situation strictly in terms of what would be effective, I question that tactic based on research (and I could be wrong here) stating that is does not function as a deterrent.
Letting victims have the power to kill or severely injure those with nefarious mindsets that they act upon
Are you telling me suppliers won't adjust? Do you really expect me to believe that?
Yes, minor.
they are minor to an anti gun advocate. Its like me saying as long as we have Lutheran churches, banning catholic, Methodist, Baptist and Episcopal Churches, are minor infringements on religion. I don't go to church so such restrictions are minor to me
I also don't play golf so limiting people to one wood and one iron is minor as well
given those restrictions do nothing positive, they are major infringements on freedom
and given your comments I hope you chastise the anti gun fellow travelers of yours who constantly bray we need England gun laws here
Here is a thought for you. Let's take any epidemic. We focus our efforts on the cause not the symptoms. The acts are a symptom of a larger issue.
Are you telling me suppliers won't adjust? Do you really expect me to believe that?
Yes, minor.
That's a war not a solution.
the purpose and motivation for leftwing gun control schemes is not to deter criminals
rather it is to allow Democrats and Liberals to pretend they are DOING SOMETHING about crime (without actually hurting criminals) and harass and annoy people who are perceived to be mostly conservative Christian white males (that is the perception of whom most gun owners are)
Its not like that at all. It's more like anti emission laws, or not allowing heavily tinted windshields, or and number of restrictions we have in automobiles.
The official definition is "self defense" not war:roll:
You stated the fact of his examples as "minor". You said it all right there. You may wish to walk it back, but dont bother we know where you stand.
Its not like that at all. It's more like anti emission laws, or not allowing heavily tinted windshields, or and number of restrictions we have in automobiles.
If you can not stay rational please don't respond to my posts. I am not interested in a partisan pissing contest.
yeah like say ten round magazine limits passed in 1994 and bans on most semi auto rifles in California
you are either IGNORANT of what dems have done in many states or dishonestly claim that such laws don't exist and that assholes like those turds mentioned by CC don't plan even more nonsense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?