- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Of course not. Faster than human reaction. And not nearly as nervous. It's actually difficult to shoot under pressure.
Dopers often cut the vocal cords of their attack dogs so you don't hear them coming There is a tactic to deal with that though. you bring a K9 unit and it alerts you to the attack dogs. Then you shoot them with a suppressed 22 pistol. the K9 guys I know often carry such things
I don't disagree. But with the dog, you likely won't need the second option, and if do, a bullet or two would be enough.
Like I said, I've lived 55 years in some of the roughest areas in the country with no need to be armed. None. So I dint know what country you live in or why you think you so much overkill. But self defense shouldn't take more than seven rounds.
how many people have such dogs. I bet less than one in 250 dog owners. I am up on this top, my sister in law raises dogs for police departments and is a trainer. her dogs sell for several thousand dollars. After the cops get done with final training-they cost more than a decent used car.
True enough. But high quality home invaders I suspect is quite rare indeed.
dogs have to get close to hurt you. right in knife range
most attack dogs are wide open for a knife counter based on how they are trained. the ones that aren't cost thousands and thousands of dollars
I don't disagree. But with the dog, you likely won't need the second option, and if do, a bullet or two would be enough.
Like I said, I've lived 55 years in some of the roughest areas in the country with no need to be armed. None. So I dint know what country you live in or why you think you so much overkill. But self defense shouldn't take more than seven rounds.
I don't disagree. But with the dog, you likely won't need the second option, and if do, a bullet or two would be enough.
Like I said, I've lived 55 years in some of the roughest areas in the country with no need to be armed. None. So I dint know what country you live in or why you think you so much overkill. But self defense shouldn't take more than seven rounds.
That's what gangs do, among other criminal activities.
Its illegal for them to have any weapons
you catch them with a weapon-they go to jail
why should honest people be punished at a certain number of rondos
those aren't large capacity magazines-they are NORMAL CAPACITY
what is fair is that someone like you-who doesn't understand the issue-should NEVER be in a position to tell me what I need based on your own lack of understanding coupled with your fear of honest people owning guns
True. But if come I my house, you'll be relatively close.
You never say why you need those 100 shot mags and I am starting to wonder about you now too. Are you planning to go out with a bang taking as many as you can with you? Why should I have to wonder what there eventual purpose would be?
Doesn't make them quality. Those I've known have been decent fellows, surprisingly, but not highly trained or if quality.
And yet LEOs will often empty their guns, Boo. Nerves.
I don't know that much about self-defense with a handgun. But I'm guessing that, unless one hits a vital area and someone bleeds out? He's not down with one shot. Or maybe even two. I'm pretty sure I'd empty my gun. I hope I never have to find out...
You might, and you might miss with all 17 rounds. Like I said, it's harder than you think. But you won't be any better with 50 rounds. If your skilled, one or two will do.
Best defense, discourage before they invade.
You don't have to have "quality" whatever the heck that's supposed to mean when it comes to a home invasion. You need balls of steel and motivation. That is all.
yeah and the last place you want to be is close to someone who knows how to use a knife and wants to kill you. I'd rather deal with a pistol at 2 feet than someone with a knife who knows what he is doing
I'd never own 100 round mags-do keep up-I am talking about people having the same self defense tools as cops. 100 round mags jam too much to be reliable. but people ought to be able to own them because PEOPLE LIKE YOU HAVE PROVEN that your goal is to ban a bit more each time
just like CUOMO in NYS
you just contradicted yourself three times
I will let you ponder until tomorrow why you have undercut your own silly argument
I agree with one thing-discourage them before you have to shoot. Shooting is a messy business
its hard to clean carpet up
I never really got the stain out of my Yale varsity jacket after shooting that turd those many years ago
yeah and the last place you want to be is close to someone who knows how to use a knife and wants to kill you. I'd rather deal with a pistol at 2 feet than someone with a knife who knows what he is doing
You might, and you might miss with all 17 rounds. Like I said, it's harder than you think. But you won't be any better with 50 rounds. If your skilled, one or two will do.
Best defense, discourage before they invade.
I suspect it seems that way to you because you're still having that fantom argue with what I never said.
No you really don't. Just stupidity and hubris. Maybe enough drugs or peer pressure. But not balls. They assume the advantage. If they thought otherwise, they wouldn't do it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?