- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 31,926
- Reaction score
- 29,390
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yup, and we didn't have boots on the ground until the last half of the 60s. We were there, more or less administratively, but that's about it.
Obama would be a former President. She is not, is she?
I'm fine with you guys have a Palin obsession. It's amusing.
hmmm, i see her other kids were at this celebratory event, as a family
was the little prop at this pugilistic affair, too (don't even say the stretch hummer was too small to bring him along)
if so, i will accept your point
if not, it confirms mine. to her, he is a political prop. one to be taken in front of the camera at the appointed time and place
THAT speaks to the character of sarah palin. she is absolutely an opportunist and uses that special needs child to advance her personal political agenda
She is the former governor of a state. So to some extent it's news.
I still think she plants these stories herself.
Obama would be a former President. She is not, is she?
.
you seem to have forgotten that her other kids WERE at this family celebrationWas their Down Syndrome child at his father's 50 birthday party? I assume that was a rhetorical question. I wasn't invited.
Why - was it a political party? What office is Todd Palin running for?
My kids weren't at their father's 50th birthday party either. I guess that means my kids are just props.
Deal with reality. She isn't President. Never will be. Her purpose on this Earth is apparently to drive people insane. It's working.
I think she is cute. Yeah, she might be nuttier than a squirrel turd, but I'd still do her if she would let me. Todd could watch.
you seem to have forgotten that her other kids WERE at this family celebration
but the prop was nowhere to be seen
of course, there were going to be no media cameras present. he didn't need to be there
Go on attacking her special needs child and reducing his life to nothing, justa. Says much about you.
hmmm, i see her other kids were at this celebratory event, as a family
was the little prop at this pugilistic affair, too (don't even say the stretch hummer was too small to bring him along)
if so, i will accept your point
if not, it confirms mine. to her, he is a political prop. one to be taken in front of the camera at the appointed time and place
THAT speaks to the character of sarah palin. she is absolutely an opportunist and uses that special needs child to advance her personal political agenda
Really?
I guess then the Romney's adopting a non-white baby is political opportunism?
Sorry, but what you are suggesting is worse than racism, it is bigotry of a deeper sort. You are suggesting that because she was once in the spotlight she has to hide a special needs kid?
Calling a child of difference a "prop', an IT, is tremendously ugly. Might as well change two letters and make IT a 'pet".
But thank you for demonstrating the true colors of "liberals" in Amerika.
Really?
I guess then the Romney's adopting a non-white baby is political opportunism?
Sorry, but what you are suggesting is worse than racism, it is bigotry of a deeper sort. You are suggesting that because she was once in the spotlight she has to hide a special needs kid?
Calling a child of difference a "prop', an IT, is tremendously ugly. Might as well change two letters and make IT a 'pet".
But thank you for demonstrating the true colors of "liberals" in Amerika.
Romney's adopting isn't the topic of this thread Fearandloathing.I guess then the Romney's adopting a non-white baby is political opportunism?
It is a sorry thing that Palin does with her own son--I agree with you.Sorry, but what you are suggesting is worse than racism, it is bigotry of a deeper sort.
You are suggesting that because she was once in the spotlight she has to hide a special needs kid?
Uglier is the way Palin has done this, which you of course excuse as per normal.Calling a child of difference a "prop', an IT, is tremendously ugly. Might as well change two letters and make IT a 'pet".
She is the former governor of a state. So to some extent it's news.
I still think she plants these stories herself.
Go on attacking her special needs child and reducing his life to nothing, justa. Says much about you.
But thank you for demonstrating the true colors of "liberals" in Amerika.
it - the special needs child - is her political prop
we only see him at media events where he is used to advance palin's political interests
it is what it is
ugly
absolutely
Meh, as often as I disagree with Bubba, he's right on this one. She's a grandstander. She will do damned near anything to garner camera time.
That isn't debatable.
Calling her special needs child nothing but a prop is.
I wouldn't use the word "nothing", that is cruel. But Sarah most certainly used him as a prop.
In justabubba's world a child with Downs Syndrome has no use beyond that of a photo op for political purposes. His words speak volumes, but I won't pin other all Liberals with that disgusting line of thinking. He's the only one who shared his opinion of special needs children.
I didn't bring my 6 year olds to adult parties either. But mine aren't special needs, so I guess I'm off the hook.
You mean in Sarah Palin's world tres borrachos.In justabubba's world a child with Downs Syndrome has no use beyond that of a photo op for political purposes.
Your words speak volumes in trying to smear him with the shameful truth about Palin--His words speak volumes, but I won't pin other all Liberals with that disgusting line of thinking.
Trying to shame another poster ove Palin's actions is a pitiful stunt tres, only surpassed by the pitiful stunts of Palin using her own children.He's the only one who shared his opinion of special needs children.
More phony outrage from the Queen of the Palinesque tribe on DP !I didn't bring my 6 year olds to adult parties either. But mine aren't special needs, so I guess I'm off the hook.
But, if the 50 million-plus people who voted for her on McCain's ticket had their way, she most certainly would be the potential future one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?