Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
The only thing that could help Obama is if he would stop campaigning and start being president and work to fix the economy and unemployment
A liberal media poll for someone that is not running. More useless polls and news to attack Palin
No amount of spin is going to change that she got history wrong. This has been demonstrated OVER AND OVER. I find it a laugh a minute how some of you have so little objectivity that you refuse to see this. Guess that's why they call it "blind partisanship".
But it is correct. If it is correct, then it is correct.If someone else spoke like that but instead used slang for conservatives, you'd call it typical liberal slander and go on a long rant I'm sure about how unprofessional liberals are. Tell me why I should I listen to it when it comes from your mouth and not theirs?
Sarah Palin said that Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t gonna be taking away our arms, by ringing those bells and making sure, as he’s riding his horse through town, to send those warning shots and bells that we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free.”
As the author of a book about Revere’s life, when I heard this, I groaned. From Revere’s own account, it’s clear that he didn’t fire a shot, he didn’t ring a bell, and he didn’t intend to warn the British of anything (unless you count the townsfolk as British, which they technically were for a little while longer).
The unarmed Revere left Boston in total silence. He muffled the oars of his boat as men rowed him to Charlestown, and he rode in silence after leaving Charlestown by horseback. He was, after all, on a secret mission to alert John Hancock and Samuel Adams in Lexington that they were in danger.
Only after scaring up two redcoats on horseback and turning away to Medford did he begin waking the countryside. He first woke the militia captain in Medford and then rode to Lexington raising the alarm — by shouting, mind you, not shooting or ringing bells.
As of a couple of weeks ago, after the "Paul Revere fallout", polls indicated that 2/3 of Americans would not vote for Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin Gets Bad News From Poll In Wake Of Paul Revere Remarks
She is a non-issue the liberals are infatuated with
That's just the Liberal media lying as usual... The Liberals are bloodthirsty to smear and attack Palin because they fear her.
So, extreme liberals are right, government is the answer? :coffeepap
Excellent point --- or belief at any rate. I hope that all republicans adopt your way of thinking and respond by supporting Palin in the face of leftist criticism.
No but a person actually doing the job they were voted to do would help
So you're not going to argue that Liberals are scared of her anymore?
No need to the media following her around proves that
No but a person actually doing the job they were voted to do would help
What about logic?
Nice spin from a liberal site. Here is where he is according to your site
Obama promises kept and not - International Business Times
President Obama has kept 127 of his promises, compromised on 40, broken 28, is stalled in 82, and is still working on keeping 226, according to the political tracking website Politifact.
You mean in Washington? Washington DC, the capitol? Logic? Unheard of!
What about logic?
How can going point by point, for pages and pages, be construed as a "liberal slant"? And if you refuse my link, I return the favor. I'll stick with facts, thanks.
Cause he explained what he told her.
And you still haven't answered my question ... are you now admitting she got it wrong but excusing her because of what he said?
She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?
She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?
WTF?? I didn't say she's stupid, I said ...She got it wrong, so she's stupid? So if you get something wrong, you're stupid too right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?