- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 11,963
- Reaction score
- 3,543
- Location
- Naperville, IL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Or when she was asked what the Bush doctrine is and she had absolutely no idea. Real gotcha question right?
she keeps the liberals in here, talking about her... instead of out fixing the problems within their own party.
It's the media with all the gotcha questions.
THEY DIDN'T ASK HER ANYTHING ABOUT PAUL REVERE. They asked her "What have you seen so far today and what are you going to take away from your visit?" She then proceeded to bring up Paul Revere on her own.
Funny that its Sarah that consistently gets "got". If you can't hit a softball, you'll never hit a hardball and you will never be president.
She would fair much better if she were actually reasonably educated and humble enough not to speak when she had no clue about the subject at hand.
Her gaffes are pure idiocy though. No other politician's gaffes are not knowing what a doctrine is, or knowing what a supreme court case is. She is a complete and total idiot plain and simple. She was wrong about Paul Revere for the reasons I explained and many others in here did, and yet she still gets it wrong. HELL the network she gets her paycheck from tried to help her get through it and she ****ed them over too!
But it is okay if you do not know what year it is. Your bias is showing
Her gaffes are pure idiocy though. No other politician's gaffes are not knowing what a doctrine is, or knowing what a supreme court case is.
Just when you think Sarah Palin could not get any stupider, she surprises yet again. But don't take my word for it. Watch Palin confuse herself on Paul Revere.
This one is precious, and is one for those blooper reels of the future. LOL.
BTW, there was no such thing as the Second Amendment at that time, as the Constitution had not yet been written. And, needless to say, Revere didn't ride to warn the British. LOL.
You know how Sarah Palin said Paul Revere warned the British? Well, he did. Now, who looks stupid? - latimes.comYou know how Sarah Palin said Paul Revere warned the British? Well, he did. Now, who looks stupid?
ou may have heard recently something about that Sarah Palin telling a reporter that Paul Revere warned the British on his famous rousing revolutionary ride.
Now, that so many Americans have wallowed in their smug confirmation that Palin is an idiot unqualified for anything but repeating sixth-grade history, how far, wide and fast do you think the contradictory news will spread that the former governor of Alaska was indeed correct?
That the Republican non-candidate, in fact, knew more about the actual facts of Revere's midnight ride than all those idiots unknowingly revealing their own ignorance by laughing at her faux faux pas? How secretly embarrassing this must be, to be forced to face that you're dumber than the reputed dummy.
How so? I don't recall the people criticizing her for this having a skewed assessment of the Paul Revere story.
People were after her because they didn't know that Revere had told the British anything. They were wrong.
soccerboy said:No I am calling out the fact though people are saying she meant to say Revere warned the British, not the colonies. I mean let's be honest, this is probably a gaffe that ended up working more into her favor because she cannot be called an idiot like Bachmann for saying that Lexington and Concord was in New Hampshire.
Warning the British was not a part of the mission even tough Palin seems to think otherwise:
"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there that 'hey, you're not going to take American arms, you are not going to beat our own well-armed persons individual private militia that we have.'"
It does not bother me in the least that any of you make fun of Palin or any other politician. No. It is your inability to recognize that Palin actually got the story right. Paul Revere, in his own memorandum, said essentially the same thing as Palin. Only he said it better and he said it first. I am poking at your inability to understand. Nothing more. Nothing less.Hurt feelings because someone criticized Sarah Palin. Idiot, right?
Me too. It is clearly 2008.I guarantee President Obama knows what year it is, don't be silly.
If conservative republicans spent HALF as much time trying to fix the problems in their own party as they spend whining like little girls about Obama...
I'm just sayin.
1. that's not a gaffe (which would be relatively meaningless in and of itself) of switching out the word "colonist" for "British" - that's an actual depiction of what happened.
2. Part of his ride was that he told a bunch of British soldiers that they were going to fail.
when you are reduced to arguing semantics in order to make someone else look stupid, all that happens is you end up looking petty and desperate.
I guarantee President Obama knows what year it is, don't be silly.
People were after her for two reasons. She misspoke about Revere warning the British on his "Midnight Ride" and because some liberal hacks look for any reason to attack her. This whole thing REALLY isn't a big deal.
Was he ringing bells and shooting off guns?
1. that's not a gaffe (which would be relatively meaningless in and of itself) of switching out the word "colonist" for "British" - that's an actual depiction of what happened.
2. Part of his ride was that he told a bunch of British soldiers that they were going to fail.
when you are reduced to arguing semantics in order to make someone else look stupid, all that happens is you end up looking petty and desperate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?