Marcus Maloy
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Kamino
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Nothing...What does Saddam have anyhting to do with evolution? Please link the 2 together so that it makes since.
we know that there were never any WMD's in Iraq
Nothing...
But conservatives believe that the "WMD" crap is a FACT, and we know that there were never any WMD's in Iraq and that the American people were lied too.
On the other hand, things that have a great multitude of fact to them, such as Evolution, are considered LIES by conservatives....
***Saddam had WMD and he used them on his own people. We did find 500 units of WMD's and the rest were either destroyed, hidden or sent to Syria once the heat from the U.N. was lit under Saddam's arse. So the American people were not lied to, and Saddam is dead (good riddance) and Iraq now has a Democracy thanks to Bush. So I see that you believe we are evolutionary decendants of apes. Another liberal with his head on straight...that's progress my man.
You’re both talking about the "biological" weapons that were found correct?Chemical and biological weapons are under that term, and thus is it safe to say that he at least had them at one point. Since he used them against the Kurds and all.Saddam had WMD and he used them on his own people. We did find 500 units of WMD's and the rest were either destroyed, hidden or sent to Syria once the heat from the U.N. was lit under Saddam's arse
No, I'm not. I'm talking about the ones he used to kill hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people. I don't subscribe to the idea that Saddam had any WMDs when we went into Iraq in 2003, nor that he had any for quite some time. But what I'm saying is that AT SOME POINT he certainly had them.You’re both talking about the "biological" weapons that were found correct?
Ok well the main point that needs to be taken into consideration is that he didn't have them when we went it, and these weren't the ones used in the original arguments to invade the country.No, I'm not. I'm talking about the ones he used to kill hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people. I don't subscribe to the idea that Saddam had any WMDs when we went into Iraq in 2003, nor that he had any for quite some time. But what I'm saying is that AT SOME POINT he certainly had them.
You’re both talking about the "biological" weapons that were found correct?
And no, they're not WMD.
They were degraded rusted shells from what use to be a biological weapon back during the 1980's Iran/Iraq war. They degraded to the point where there was basically nothing in them, and they were less harmful than common household cleaners. Saddam had absolutely no idea that they existed...So no, there we're never any "Weapons of Mass Destruction" found in Iraq.
Even if you wanted to count degraded canisters as "WMD", you still miss the fact that these were not the "WMD" that Bush was talking about when he lied to the American people.
This was a cute little ploy to try and save Bush's ***.... calling little metal can's with things less harmful than Windex "WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION".
I guess they thought this would vindicate him er something...
Who knows what goes through the mind of Rick Santorum?
Clinton never said he had WMD...Did Clinton lie when he said Saddam had WMDs? Did Kerry lie when he said Saddam had WMDs? Was the rest of the world lying when they said Saddam had WMDs?
Upon looking at the numbers, you are indeed right. It would be about one million at the most. My mistake.A disgusting exxageration...
Clinton never said he had WMD...
The most he ever said was of the possibility that Saddam could obtain enriched uranium, meaning he could have them in the future.
Kerry was going on the reports the President addressed to congress, which were later discovered to be flat out lies.
"The rest of the world"...your joking right?
Clinton never said he had WMD...
The most he ever said was of the possibility that Saddam could obtain enriched uranium, meaning he could have them in the future.
Kerry was going on the reports the President addressed to congress, which were later discovered to be flat out lies.
"The rest of the world"...your joking right?
Nothing...
But conservatives believe that the "WMD" crap is a FACT, and we know that there were never any WMD's in Iraq and that the American people were lied too.
Clinton never said he had WMD...
The most he ever said was of the possibility that Saddam could obtain enriched uranium, meaning he could have them in the future.
Kerry was going on the reports the President addressed to congress, which were later discovered to be flat out lies.
"The rest of the world"...your joking right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?