- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Nah I didn't abandon it.....Go read the first post again. Then get back to me......when you catch up.
You've completely abandoned the topic.
He doesn't see it. He genuinely thinks Reuters is making this into a scandal. It isn't. It reported on something that happened. It is he who is making it seem bigger than it actually is. These were unclassified e-mails. A FOIA request would have achieved 50% of what they did. The ambassador/diplomat addresses? What are they going to do with them? Send them Nigerian prince phishing scams?
He doesn't see it. He genuinely thinks Reuters is making this into a scandal. It isn't. It reported on something that happened. It is he who is making it seem bigger than it actually is. These were unclassified e-mails. A FOIA request would have achieved 50% of what they did. The ambassador/diplomat addresses? What are they going to do with them? Send them Nigerian prince phishing scams?
Well you are the one that deliberately ignored the part about the Ambassador and Diplomats.
Oh noes......they can just get any other email account from whom they talk to. But lets see, your so called uhm, "smart power" :roll: attempts to downplay this.
Nah I didn't abandon it.....Go read the first post again. Then get back to me......when you catch up.
Yes, deliberately ignoring your argument shows that I am dismissing it because it is irrelevant. It doesn't mean I don't know what an ambassador or diplomat is. Your absurd claim that I don't won't change that.
They can "get any other e-mail account from whom they talk to"? Lol. Ummm okay? And? Yes, they have the e-mail addresses. What can they do with an e-mail address? Do you know? It doesn't sound like you do.
Uhm The NY Times broke the story. Do try using cognitive power, I know its a lot to ask. But it will help you.
How about you catch me up: what exactly are you claiming?
No see that goes with what you were saying. You said I abandon it. All you have to do is read the first post and that shows you why I haven't.
Did you want to try an answer those questions again. It wont hurt.....honest. :lol:
You're still having problems with what is being said. Nobody is discussing who broke the story or who is discussing it. What is being stated is that it's simply not the scandal you're making it out to be. It's not even the issue you're making it out to be. They could have literally gotten 50% of that information through FOIA requests if they weren't already available to the public. The e-mail addresses are useless. What are they planning to do with them? Send keyloggers and phishing scams to servers monitored around the clock? Get serious.
Uhm, try hacking into their accounts, reading their emails from whoever else they are talking to. :doh
So you're not gonna say what you're claiming, or you don't know?
I can't help it you wont read the first post that's on you. But what you stated.....was wrong. I didn't abandon it.
So your not going to answer those questions because you don't know or is there some other reason?
You just got done stating Reuters.....it wasn't. You were wrong, again! Your Usual and looking to play off one word wont work here. I'm telling you now. So you don't waste your time with that useless tactic again and again.
What scandal am I making it out to be?
Oh this just gets better and better. Now BO and his Team are admitting that the Russians have been getting to BO's unclassified emails. Do you recall BO grinning as he admitted he had emails from Hillary and emailed her back. All while Hillary said no official business were in her private emails. That she was never hacked. Sure is starting to look like Hillary gave up more than just a breach to National Security, doesn't it? Even worse was BO and his Team thinking they could keep this hidden. What say ye
How do you hack an account having only the e-mail address? This should be really good. Wait, let me get some popcorn. :lol:
Here you go:
You've asserted that this might be relate to a completely different issue, that it links to Hillary somehow, and that is makes it look like Hillary did more than just breach NS. Again, this is against every bit of evidence from you own article or even the facts of your article. Not only does this issue have nothing to do with Hillary, it's not even the issue you're trying to make it seem. They literally got FOIA request type of information and e-mail addresses that are pretty useless even though you believe they can be 'hacked'. That's what we're discussing. Your analysis for the situation, not who is reporting it.
Oh this just gets better and better. Now BO and his Team are admitting that the Russians have been getting to BO's unclassified emails. Do you recall BO grinning as he admitted he had emails from Hillary and emailed her back.That she was never hacked. Sure is starting to look like Hillary gave up more than just a breach to National Security, doesn't it? Even worse was BO and his Team thinking they could keep this hidden. What say ye?All while Hillary said no official business were in her private emails.
Russian hackers who penetrated sensitive parts of the White House computer system last year read President Barack Obama's unclassified emails, the New York Times reported on Saturday, quoting U.S. officials. There is no evidence that the president's email account itself was hacked, White House officials said. Still, the fact that some of Mr. Obama's communications were among those retrieved by hackers has been one of the most closely held findings of the inquiry," the paper said.
The New York Times said on Saturday the breach had been "far more intrusive and worrisome than has been publicly acknowledged." It said that although no classified networks had been compromised, officials conceded that the unclassified system still contains highly sensitive information such as email exchanges with diplomats, exchanges about personnel moves and legislation, presidential schedules and discussion about policy.
The paper said that Senior White House officials had known for months about the depth of the intrusion.....snip~
Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT
What's the other reason.
I'm still waiting and hoping someone asks Hillary or one of her stooges why she would erase all her private emails? She saved 'em to begin with and then erased 'em anyway? Who does that?
I'm not sure what your policy would entail. You mean no non-state use of emails, or no use of email by the individual?
They've "penetrated sensitive areas" only to leave their signature,Obviously not professionals; if so, then betrayed.having gathered nothing of any significance whatsoever.
How is that clear to you Eco?
"...highly sensitive information such as email exchanges with diplomats, exchanges about personnel moves and legislation, presidential schedules and discussion about policy..."
sounds pretty significant over in this chair.
How is that clear to you Eco?
"...highly sensitive information such as email exchanges with diplomats, exchanges about personnel moves and legislation, presidential schedules and discussion about policy..."
sounds pretty significant over in this chair.
Cmon now B. Were suppose to believe it doesn't mean nothing and its not serious to have Diplomats and Leaders Schedules and all. They could be holding Birthday parties with their families and only communicating n-stuff.
How is that clear to you Eco?
"...highly sensitive information such as email exchanges with diplomats, exchanges about personnel moves and legislation, presidential schedules and discussion about policy..."
sounds pretty significant over in this chair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?