No but you're an Obama man, though and through, a socialist to the core.
You won't "get" this because you refuse, not because the evidence is overwhelming.
If your not a liberal show me one post where you have criticized liberal policy.
Too many CT leaps for me. Nonetheless, I hold Benghazi against her.
Yes. US citizens, foreign nationals, foreign organizations etc can make a FOIA request. Shouldn't you know this? Didn't you work as a "journalist"? Didn't you work at some respectable journalistic outfit? Here, inform yourself:
OASCR, Frequently Asked Questions - Freedom of Information Act
What part of 'unclassified' do you have trouble with?
That's alright several understood you can't figure out what an Ambassador or a diplomat is. Nor the part about getting others email accounts. But you can try and fake like you don't understand. I won't mind.
Also, you can validate that anyone else's email account they have doesn't have anything sensitive they were talking about, Right?
White House officials said that no classified networks had been compromised, and that the hackers had collected no classified information. Many senior officials have two computers in their offices, one operating on a highly secure classified network and another connected to the outside world for unclassified communications.
Haha. It must be nice to live in fantasyland and invent one's foes.
The evidence of what? Some kids in Russia got the receptionist's phone log. The only evidence that produces is regarding who is a hack.
I don't need to prove anything to you. I really don't care if you spend the rest of your life swinging madly at strawmen. To the windmills, Don; strike hard.
What part of honesty do you have a problem with? What part of incompetence do you not have a problem with.
FFS, the White House was hacked, Hillary was hacked and there's evidence a cover up is on going and all you liberals can whine about is "vast right wing conspiracies" and how they are picking on your poor, black president.
Wake the **** up.
You guys won't bother locking the barn doors until all the cattle have been stolen
If one believes the US President is giving the Iranian regime drone tech directly and openly though the physical giving of a drone, then one will believe anything.
Yous heards 'm! Wake up white people!
The Obama administration lied....AGAIN....when that drone went down.
They said it was destroyed. Well Iran disagreed.
The people that would believe anything are responsible for putting this corrupt incompetencent in office and probably still believe that that drone was destroyed and the Iranians are pulling our leg.
When do Profound Foreign Policy mishaps stop being mishaps ?
Obama's backing the Muslim Brotherhood to his destabilizing the Middle east by enabling the spread of Islamo-facism, one thing is clear.
He's always erred on the side of Islamic extremism. They are repeatedly the recipients of the fruits of his Foreign Policy disasters.
English isn't your first language is it?...
Where I come from we call that trolling, or bating.
Either I understood, or I didn't. It can't be both. Get your narrative straight. In either case, the e-mails were unclassified and they stole a rolodex. That's pretty terrible "hacking" work, hardly anything to get concerned about. :shrug:
This is the important part:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/u...obamas-unclassified-emails-officials-say.html
They got unclassified information, and they got a rolodex. I'm sure our national security is shaking in its booties.
Where's that, Stormfront?
What part of spying don't you?
So the White House that said "you can keep your plan' admits months after the fact they were hacked but "no classified" documents were involved.
What part of honesty do you have a problem with? What part of incompetence do you not have a problem with.
FFS, the White House was hacked, Hillary was hacked and there's evidence a cover up is on going and all you liberals can whine about is "vast right wing conspiracies" and how they are picking on your poor, black president.
Wake the **** up.
You guys won't bother locking the barn doors until all the cattle have been stolen
You're are the one that says you can't understand things when many others sure got the point. Like I said, I don't mind what you show others about how you think.
You get lamer and lamer?
Is there something you wish to contribute to the debate, or just keep on baiting?
So now that you were caught with your pants down about FOIA requests, you try to avoid the fact by switching to a rant. Okay! Yes, Fear&Loathing, guy who claims to be a journalist, FOREIGN NATIONALS CAN MAKE FOIA REQUESTS. You should know that, being a journalist in Canada and all or did you only work for a US outfit? In any case, it doesn't excuse not knowing the ins and outs of a form that you'd fill out often.
Anyways, nobody needs to wake up because a bunch of script kiddies got unclassified information and a rolodex. It's about as low on the totem pole of 'hacking' as you can possibly get. Hell, Petraeus released far more sensitive information and he only got a slap on the wrist. Pretending that this is the scandal you wish it were just makes you seems slightly obsessed with trying to attack Obama.
In any case, I don't have time to be running around the forum screaming about the magnitude of this scandal. It simply isn't that big of an issue. :shrug:
I said I didn't understand something? Nope. I said that they stole a rolodex and unclassified information. Big deal. It simply isn't the scandal you're making it out to be. That remains true. :shrug:
No once again you just can't get it Right.....its not me making it into a scandal. Talk to the NY Times, Reuters, and the AP. Those meanies are causing all the trouble.
Evidently they thought it was worth mentioning since the WH was hacked less than 30 days ago.
The Obama administration lied....AGAIN....when that drone went down.
They said it was destroyed. Well Iran disagreed.
The people that would believe anything are responsible for putting this corrupt incompetencent in office and probably still believe that that drone was destroyed and the Iranians are pulling our leg.
When do Profound Foreign Policy mishaps stop being mishaps ?
Obama's backing the Muslim Brotherhood to his destabilizing the Middle east by enabling the spread of Islamo-facism, one thing is clear.
He's always erred on the side of Islamic extremism. They are repeatedly the recipients of the fruits of his Foreign Policy disasters.
Okay since you were caught with not knowing what an Ambassador or a Diplomat is.
Or why Team BO still says sensitive information. Do you think we can move onto those other email accounts they got?
Do you think it is worrisome that they got other peoples email accounts that work in the WH and Outside of the WH. When did you think this means nothing with people who work in government?
The contention is not with the news, it's with your analysis.
Did Blumenthal's Email get Hacked by a Romanian Hacker leading him to Hillarys Email and her server?
Did He get State Dept Emails and others Email accounts?
Did The WH get hacked thru the State Depts Computers?
Which is false or not true,? again?
Continuing to repeat this won't make it so. You seem to do this when you have no argument. Claim that people don't know this or that.
What about them? They got the e-mail accounts of ambassadors and diplomats? Oh no! What are they going to do? Send them ads for cheap Russian brides? Offer them a real estate deal in Crimea? Try and 'hack' into classified e-mail servers as conspicuously as they did here? Your CT leads nowhere. It's simply not the issue you're trying to make it out to be.
Not really. They got unclassified information and they got e-mail addresses. Can you tell us what they'll do with those e-mail addresses? Can you tell us what they can do? Send them a keylogger? :lol:
What about them? They got the e-mail accounts of ambassadors and diplomats? Oh no! What are they going to do? Send them ads for cheap Russian brides? Offer them a real estate deal in Crimea? Try and 'hack' into classified e-mail servers as conspicuously as they did here? Your CT leads nowhere. It's simply not the issue you're trying to make it out to be.
The contention is not with the news, it's with your analysis.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?