- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 33,522
- Reaction score
- 10,826
- Location
- Between Athens and Jerusalem
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I guess you went the DO route. Or maybe had to go to the Caribbean.
I think the spirit of my comment still stands. The US has been protecting the west for far too long, with very little in return. Instead of spending on a military, they have hid behind America's. I think some time dealing with Putin alone (as well as any other threats) might allow for some reflection. Europe needs us more than we need it.
For shooting down a drone? Who cares?
Sanctions, however, is about the only practical / appropriate tool in the toolbag. Do you have another idea?
Indeed, in this we are in full agreement.
If Obama was actually an effective and respected leader, he wouldnt have to do a thing, but he's an open book and the worlds thugs have their way with him.
He tried (and again failed) to talk tough about Russia saying there would be repercussions. Today he cancelled the visas of 8 or so Russian officials. As you can see, he's a chump doing what chumps do. :doh
Liberals define success as feeling good about failure. :doh
This may shock you, but George Bush had his own problems. He as well as europe should have been more forceful towards Russia during the Georgian invasion. But he wasn't-of course he was busy fighting and in the winding down of the successful troop surge that Obama opposed at that time.
The fact that Obama is a weak leader is why Russia is comfortable doing as it pleases.
Thats what the left does.
Russia has been long time clear the message from the Internet. Normal propaganda for imbeciles.pics or it didn't happen
How does it feel to swallow up Russian propaganda without giving it a second thought? Is there a slight gag reflex or goes it go down smooth?
Yes. In order to defeat the Russian Federation there, we first have to defeat the Liberals here.Such partisan crap.
You are absolutely incorrect about this.
Yes. In order to defeat the Russian Federation there, we first have to defeat the Liberals here.
Yes. In order to defeat the Russian Federation there, we first have to defeat the Liberals here.
Not going to happen, doesn't need to happen.
Yeah, that's what liberals think.
No I don't see that. He should be quiet and do nothing.
You can't even define the term. How are you going to defeat them?
Incorrect about wars being fought to prove a leader had balls, or that Kennedy most likely wouldn't have committed a half million men to Vietnam under false assumptions as his (also Democrat BTW) successor did?
Once again Bill Whittle nails it. Many complain about jobs moving overseas and then arbitrarily raise American wages, which is not tied to production, and do what they can to destroy and discourage the energy sector. The only question remaining is, Is it deliberate?
If we do not defeat the Liberals here, then Russian tanks will be here very soon.
Once again Bill Whittle nails it. Many complain about jobs moving overseas and then arbitrarily raise American wages, which is not tied to production, and do what they can to destroy and discourage the energy sector. The only question remaining is, Is it deliberate?
So whats the chump in chief going to do now? Nothing, thats what.
Glory for mother russia, eh comrade?
More of the Russia just punked Obama so Obama should waste billions of dollars and thousands of troops lives to put Russia in it's place mantra.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?