Yes. Putin is declaring all property of the USSR is still under Russian control and that the Ukraine war is an "internal matter". Welcome to WWIII. Russia has just declared war on all of eastern europe.
It’s amazing how y’all literally have nothing other than absurd fearmongering. I’m still waiting for the supposed evidence of Russia wanting to invade Finland that nobody appears capable of providing.But, but, the Russophiles keep telling us Putin wants peace!
" ... supposed evidence ..." ?? Seriously ?? Where have you been looking?It’s amazing how y’all literally have nothing other than absurd fearmongering. I’m still waiting for the supposed evidence of Russia wanting to invade Finland that nobody appears capable of providing.
More fearmongering, and still no evidence of anything Russia would actually invade Finland for." ... supposed evidence ..." ?? Seriously ?? Where have you been looking?
Satellite Images Show Russian Military Buildup Near Finland – NYT - The Moscow Times
Russia is expanding its military infrastructure near the border with Finland, in what NATO officials describe as the early stages of a long-term buildup, The New York Times reported Monday.www.themoscowtimes.com
Satellite images show Russian military buildup near Finnish border
Satellite images have revealed significant new Russian military activity near Finland’s eastern border, with analysts citing increased troop accommodation, aircraft deployment, and infrastructure construction at key military bases. The images, obtained by Swedish broadcaster SVT from Planet...www.helsinkitimes.fi
Finland ‘preparing for the worst’ as Russia expands military presence near border
Head of strategy of Finnish defence forces says they are monitoring Moscow’s manoeuvring ‘very closely’www.theguardian.com
How long before Putin has an "internal dispute" over control of Estonia or Lithuania? All the Baltic States are former USSR territory.More fearmongering, and still no evidence of anything Russia would actually invade Finland for.
Finland joined a hostile, aggressive foreign alliance with a long history of launching unprovoked invasions of other countries. Russia moving troops to Murmansk—- over a hundred miles from the border— isn’t some “build up”; it’s an entirely rationale reaction to Finland’s decision making.
As already established, the only thing Western apologists have is hysterics and fearmongering.
Actually Putin has been pulling away Troops from the Finnish border until just recently. I think Putin is putting on show for Trump to prove his lies about how strong the Russian military is....not. The good news is those troops are not attacking Ukrainians...There is a good reason I dont play video OPs..as to Finland -from Russia's perspective it's more red line NATO hostile expansionism.
It's a long border so Russia is going to have defensive buildups..
Gee, that was the same “logic” used to “justify” the Vietnam War. “If we don’t fight them now, they’ll invade Thailand, and Malaysia, and Indonesia, and Australia, and then we’ll be fighting them in California!”How long before Putin has an "internal dispute" over control of Estonia or Lithuania? All the Baltic States are former USSR territory.
LOL Russia just claimed that the borders of the USSR are still legal and their claim to them cannot be resisted by the West because it is an "internal dispute". You just make stuff up to change the subject.Gee, that was the same “logic” used to “justify” the Vietnam War. “If we don’t fight them now, they’ll invade Thailand, and Malaysia, and Indonesia, and Australia, and then we’ll be fighting them in California!”
Uh, the dispute over Crimea was absolutely the result of internal Soviet boundary decisions, much like Nagorno-Kharbakh was. Trying to deny that is laughably foolish.LOL Russia just claimed that the borders of the USSR are still legal and their claim to them cannot be resisted by the West because it is an "internal dispute". You just make stuff up to change the subject.
There was "no evidence of anything Russia would actually invade" Ukraine for ..... right up until they invaded Ukraine.More fearmongering, and still no evidence of anything Russia would actually invade Finland for.
Who are you talking about? It is PUTIN who has a history of launching an unprovoked invasion of another country! What did you think invading Crimea was? What did you think invading Luhansk and Donetsk was? What do you think rocketing Kyiv is? Finland didn't want to have anything to do with NATO. They wanted to remain neutral. Look at their history. You think Finland joined NATO because of western fearmongering? How stupid is that?Finland joined a hostile, aggressive foreign alliance with a long history of launching unprovoked invasions of other countries.
Who are Russian troops in Murmansk building up for? A war with reindeer? War with migrating polar bears?Russia moving troops to Murmansk—- over a hundred miles from the border— isn’t some “build up”; it’s an entirely rationale reaction to Finland’s decision making.
Are you an AI bot? You appear to be nothing more than a Putin puppet. The only opinion on this subject that matters is Finland's, because just like his butt-buddy Trump, nothing Putin says can be believed.As already established, the only thing Western apologists have is hysterics and fearmongering.
So like Putin you want the 1991 border agreement made null and void. That will require more war and that is your goal.Uh, the dispute over Crimea was absolutely the result of internal Soviet boundary decisions, much like Nagorno-Kharbakh was. Trying to deny that is laughably foolish.
The fact your narrative has been debunked for over fifty years is entirely relevant.
So, the border conflict arose due to Soviet internal boundaries. That’s just reality.So like Putin you want the 1991 border agreement made null and void. That will require more war and that is your goal.
There was evidence of a border di spittle between the Russians and Ukrainians.....which no such thing exists between Russia and Finland.There was "no evidence of anything Russia would actually invade" Ukraine for ..... right up until they invaded Ukraine.
Who are you talking about? It is PUTIN who has a history of launching an unprovoked invasion of another country! What did you think invading Crimea was? What did you think invading Luhansk and Donetsk was? What do you think rocketing Kyiv is? Finland didn't want to have anything to do with NATO. They wanted to remain neutral. Look at their history. You think Finland joined NATO because of western fearmongering? How stupid is that?
Who are Russian troops in Murmansk building up for? A war with reindeer? War with migrating polar bears?
Are you an AI bot? You appear to be nothing more than a Putin puppet. The only opinion on this subject that matters is Finland's, because just like his butt-buddy Trump, nothing Putin says can be believed.
Yes. Putin is declaring all property of the USSR is still under Russian control and that the Ukraine war is an "internal matter". Welcome to WWIII. Russia has just declared war on all of eastern europe.
How long before Putin has an "internal dispute" over control of Estonia or Lithuania? All the Baltic States are former USSR territory.
The US and NATO couldn’t beat guys who didn’t have a single tank to their name. It definitely wouldn’t take five weeks for the West to be wiped out if World War Three actually happened.Russia can't even beat Ukraine. How do you think they will do against the USA and NATO?
WWIII will be over in about 5 weeks.
.
And America is still sulking about the fall of apartheid and pushing the domino theory. How embarrassing.And Putin still can't take Ukraine. How embarrassing.
The fall of Russia is coming again and for much of the same reasons. You will see soon enough. Russia is a house of cards and Putin will not be able to juggle it for much longer.So, the border conflict arose due to Soviet internal boundaries. That’s just reality.
Coming from the guy fantasizing about carving up Russia and “blowing up the Kremlin” or whatever that’s a laugh.
Why make demonstrably false claims that are so easily disproved. The Soviet Union wasn't even dissolved fifty years ago.Uh, the dispute over Crimea was absolutely the result of internal Soviet boundary decisions, much like Nagorno-Kharbakh was. Trying to deny that is laughably foolish.
The fact your narrative has been debunked for over fifty years is entirely relevant.
And America is still sulking about the fall of apartheid and pushing the domino theory. How embarrassing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?