• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russia Blocks 49 Navalny-Linked Websites, Allies Say

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,414
Reaction score
102,601
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

77/26/2
Russia’s state internet watchdog on Monday blocked 49 websites linked to jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny, including his personal website where he published investigations into alleged high-level corruption that have sparked nationwide protests in recent years. Roskomnadzor’s actions come one week after it blocked the website of a prominent legal group that represented Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) in the case that saw it banned as “extremist,” as well as stock-photo sharing website Pixabay. Navalny.com became inaccessible on Monday afternoon, with a message saying access has been restricted based on Russian information law. Roskomnadzor’s so-called “blocklist” website notes that Navalny.com was blocked at the request of the Prosecutor General’s Office. In a statement carried by the state-run RIA Novosti news agency, Roskomnadzor said it blocked the Navalny-linked websites because of “propaganda and banned extremist activity.” Exiled Navalny ally Leonid Volkov said nearly 50 websites linked to the jailed opposition figure were simultaneously blocked, including those of FBK lawyer Lyubov Sobol and Navalny's regional political network.

FBK’s Twitter account said it believes that authorities will next block Navalny’s “Smart Voting” website, where supporters can sign up to receive recommendations on which candidates likely to unseat pro-Kremlin incumbents to vote for in upcoming elections. Volkov noted that there’s “no doubt” that authorities will block the “Smart Voting” website closer to the parliamentary elections this September. A Moscow court declared Navalny’s political and activist network “extremist” last month, outlawing Russia’s most vocal force opposing President Vladimir Putin ahead of the vote. Navalny, 45, is currently serving two and a half years in prison on old fraud charges he and his supporters call politically motivated. He was arrested immediately upon returning to Russia in January after recovering from poisoning with what the global chemical-weapons watchdog and three European labs said was a Novichok-type nerve agent. Several top Navalny allies have fled Russia or been placed under house arrest on charges of violating coronavirus restrictions during this winter’s anti-Putin protests.


The Putin repressions against Alexei Navalny and his supporters continues without pause.
 
Why criticize Russia?

Here in the "Land of the Free," a sitting President was banned from popular websites.

And comments deemed "misinformation" were removed at the request of the government.
 




The Putin repressions against Alexei Navalny and his supporters continues without pause.

Big Brother in action.
 
Why criticize Russia?

Here in the "Land of the Free," a sitting President was banned from popular websites.

And comments deemed "misinformation" were removed at the request of the government.

There is no indication that information was “removed at the request of the government”. That’s an out and out falsehood. And therein lies the difference. In Russia, it WAS done by Putin’s government, whereas in the US it was the companies themselves who decided that they did not want misinformation on their sites, thus exercising their free speech rights under the First Amendment. No one can tell them what they “must” include or not include on their sites.
 
Back
Top Bottom