• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ruling in San Jose State volleyball case reveals farce of transgender hysteria

j brown's body

j brown's body

"A Soros-backed animal"
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
81,082
Reaction score
85,880
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
"At least one judge has seen the transphobic hysteria for what it is. In denying a request to upend this week’s Mountain West volleyball tournament and/or force San Jose State to leave one of its players home, a federal judge called out the disingenuousness of the lawsuit. And in doing so, revealed the farce behind this sudden groundswell of opposition to transgender women athletes.

“The Court finds their delay in filing this action and seeking emergency relief related to the MWC Tournament weakens their arguments," U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews wrote in his ruling issued Monday. “The movants could have sought injunctive relief much earlier if the exigencies of the circumstances required mandatory court intervention.”

For three years now, San Jose State’s volleyball team has included a transgender woman....Yet not until this season, after the player had been outed by a right-wing website and then thrown under the bus by one of her own teammates, did the howling and forfeits begin.

The anti-trans ilk likes to claim that allowing transgender women to play sports is a violation of Title IX. But Crews says it’s actually the opposite, taking five pages of his 28-page ruling to cite previous Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit cases that found discriminating against someone for being transgender is sex discrimination. Which is prohibited by Title IX. “The (plaintiffs') Title IX theory raised in this case directly conflicts with Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination against trans individuals,” Crews wrote.

For all the shrieking there is about transgender women athletes, it’s the cisgender women pushing the forfeits who cost their fellow athletes opportunities to play and saddled their teams with losses. It’s those women, not the San Jose State player, who are the real threat."

Link

The depths of the dishonesty among the anti-transgender folks runs deep and wide.
 
j brown's body said:
"At least one judge has seen the transphobic hysteria for what it is. In denying a request to upend this week’s Mountain West volleyball tournament and/or force San Jose State to leave one of its players home, a federal judge called out the disingenuousness of the lawsuit. And in doing so, revealed the farce behind this sudden groundswell of opposition to transgender women athletes.

“The Court finds their delay in filing this action and seeking emergency relief related to the MWC Tournament weakens their arguments," U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews wrote in his ruling issued Monday. “The movants could have sought injunctive relief much earlier if the exigencies of the circumstances required mandatory court intervention.”

For three years now, San Jose State’s volleyball team has included a transgender woman....Yet not until this season, after the player had been outed by a right-wing website and then thrown under the bus by one of her own teammates, did the howling and forfeits begin.

The anti-trans ilk likes to claim that allowing transgender women to play sports is a violation of Title IX. But Crews says it’s actually the opposite, taking five pages of his 28-page ruling to cite previous Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit cases that found discriminating against someone for being transgender is sex discrimination. Which is prohibited by Title IX. “The (plaintiffs') Title IX theory raised in this case directly conflicts with Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination against trans individuals,” Crews wrote.

For all the shrieking there is about transgender women athletes, it’s the cisgender women pushing the forfeits who cost their fellow athletes opportunities to play and saddled their teams with losses. It’s those women, not the San Jose State player, who are the real threat."

Link

The depths of the dishonesty among the anti-transgender folks runs deep and wide.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you have a vested interest in this. :unsure:

Hopefully the opponents forfeit in protest.
 
VySky said:
Sounds like you have a vested interest in this. :unsure:

Hopefully the opponents forfeit in protest.
Click to expand...
If this girl makes them such an overwhelming team then you will have no problem explaining why they lost their first game.
FORT COLLINS, Colo. (AP) — The San Jose State women’s volleyball team’s quest for perfection ended with its first loss of the season on Thursday night at Colorado State. San Jose State appeared rusty in its return to action for the first time in more than a week, losing 25-18, 25-20, 25-20.
Click to expand...
apnews.com

San Jose State takes volleyball court, loses 1st game of season in wake of several cancellations

The San Jose State women’s volleyball team’s quest for perfection ended with its first loss of the season at Colorado State.
apnews.com apnews.com
 
VySky said:
I quoted the first lie.
Click to expand...
You edited the sentence before you replied to it to mean what you wanted it to mean, as a way to set up your fallacy. Stop editing it.
 
Linc said:
Yes or No, VySky! Should boys and girls in high school be wrestling each other?
Click to expand...
And? I ask again, what's so special about wrestling?
 
j brown's body said:
"At least one judge has seen the transphobic hysteria for what it is. In denying a request to upend this week’s Mountain West volleyball tournament and/or force San Jose State to leave one of its players home, a federal judge called out the disingenuousness of the lawsuit. And in doing so, revealed the farce behind this sudden groundswell of opposition to transgender women athletes.

“The Court finds their delay in filing this action and seeking emergency relief related to the MWC Tournament weakens their arguments," U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews wrote in his ruling issued Monday. “The movants could have sought injunctive relief much earlier if the exigencies of the circumstances required mandatory court intervention.”

For three years now, San Jose State’s volleyball team has included a transgender woman....Yet not until this season, after the player had been outed by a right-wing website and then thrown under the bus by one of her own teammates, did the howling and forfeits begin.

The anti-trans ilk likes to claim that allowing transgender women to play sports is a violation of Title IX. But Crews says it’s actually the opposite, taking five pages of his 28-page ruling to cite previous Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit cases that found discriminating against someone for being transgender is sex discrimination. Which is prohibited by Title IX. “The (plaintiffs') Title IX theory raised in this case directly conflicts with Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination against trans individuals,” Crews wrote.

For all the shrieking there is about transgender women athletes, it’s the cisgender women pushing the forfeits who cost their fellow athletes opportunities to play and saddled their teams with losses. It’s those women, not the San Jose State player, who are the real threat."

Link

The depths of the dishonesty among the anti-transgender folks runs deep and wide.
Click to expand...
I guess I'm not familiar with this Hysteria.

What hysteria are you talking about?
 
j brown's body said:
For three years now, San Jose State’s volleyball team has included a transgender woman....Yet not until this season, after the player had been outed by a right-wing website and then thrown under the bus by one of her own teammates, did the howling and forfeits begin.
Click to expand...
Wait...so the objection is that the other teams should have complained earlier, before they knew that there was a man on the team? How would they even know that one of the teams was cheating before this man was outed? That doesn't make any sense.

For all the shrieking there is about transgender women athletes, it’s the cisgender women pushing the forfeits who cost their fellow athletes opportunities to play and saddled their teams with losses. It’s those women, not the San Jose State player, who are the real threat."
Click to expand...
The fact that a United States federal judge characterized it as "shrieking" and decided to share who he believes is "the real threat" despite that not being a matter before the court, shows that this person is a deeply embarrassing ideologue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom