- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 14,518
- Reaction score
- 3,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
This declaration of independence? Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript
...is not an outline for a "truly free society", it's a list of grievances against the British Crown in the 17th century. I think I'll go with the alt-right theory that Libertarianism is a cover for caucasian-identity politics, subconsciously or consciously it doesn't matter.
From what I've seen its mostly subconscious.
Whenever international trade is threatened you anarcho-capitalists will start a war on a dime.
The only difference between neocons and Libertarians are fat sophists and a tooth rotted Soviet immigrant.
Being true to the synthesis of "founding fathers" mixed ideas of what country should be in the form of constitution has little to do with individuals behind per se.
Good principles are good principles no matter who wrote them if they allow one to get out of this kind of miserable state.
And its even quite funny how 1:1 the protection against european "players" back the time map to current bankers and fed. if you study history you see it repeat. How is this different? I say not at all. Different faces, background is the same. Feel free to live in denial my friend, objectivity on this kind of matters is really a devil? Aight?
I saw tape today of Dr. Paul answering the question, "Do you see yourself in the Oval Office?".
His answer. Not really.
Ron Paul Asked If He Sees Himself In Oval Office: "Not Really" | RealClearPolitics
Terry Moran, ABC News: "When you lay your head on your pillow at night, do you see yourself in the Oval Office?"
Ron Paul: “Not really."
Ron Paul went on to say that he’s not blind to the odds, but they are “not as slim as they were 25 years ago.”
Twist it as you like
Verbiage outlining that the only legitimate use of government is to secure freedom is an obvious outline of a truly free society. this will be my last post to you because to be perfectly frank, you act like a child on these forums.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
It is my understanding that most of our military spending actually goes towards research, paying personnel and construction projects. Not necessarily buying M1 Abrams.
Verbiage outlining that the only legitimate use of government is to secure freedom is an obvious outline of a truly free society. this will be my last post to you because to be perfectly frank, you act like a child on these forums.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
Some interesting details here also...
Forgive me if this is old information. But I find it very interesting.
I thought we were isolationists. Now we're just like neocons?
Surrender? Do you have any idea how much money we're spending on the military these days?
If we were to cut military spending down to 50% of what it is now, it'd still be as large as China and Europe COMBINED. And Paul doesn't intend on cutting anywhere near that much.
Dishonest, ignorant, or crazy. I'm not sure which it is.
Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul secured his first caucus victory over the weekend, by winning 29 percent of the popular vote among the people of the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, the mainstream media decided to report that despite coming in second with 26 percent, Mitt Romney was the real winner.
The founding fathers believed in a strong defense. Ron Paul believes in disarmament and surrender.....
The founders believed in no entangling alliances, and did not believe in an empire.
No, one guy made a speech about entangling alliances. And the phrase "empire" used in the context you are using it is a modern political construct.
No the founders understood empire they broke away from the English empire from the French empire.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?