Hello My Son
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2023
- Messages
- 6,226
- Reaction score
- 3,473
- Location
- Heaven
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Communist
It’s always bizarre when people do that. On another level, it’s kind of concerning too…
Your resposne clearly shows you fail to comprehend the argument. You are attacking a point nobody is saying. It is impossible to argue against that, as nobody is making that stupid claim.
Please show where anyone on here is enabling rioters.
So, a mob of people surrounding your car, perhaps to start jumping on your hood, banging on your windshield and passenger-side windows or bricking them to try and break them and extricate you from your vehicle to beat you senseless, THAT is free speech to you? That is what DeSantis is talking about here. A MOB surrounding your vehicle and impeding your progress. You HAVE to assume, for your own safety, that they are not attempting to sell you cookies. You stomp on that pedal and get your ass out of there.
They do that's the point to threaten you. It's not a protest. It's authoritarianism.
Well, there it is, the protest is the threat.
Glad you were finally honest about it.
Trying to re-write history already?MAGA gave the family of Ashli Babbit $5M for her act of suicidal terrorism, like how the Jihadists in the Middle East will pay the families of their suicide bomber terrorists.
What else can it be when people cannot understand simple facts?And there's the ad hom attack. Was wondering when you would resort to that!
When nonsense doesn't work, go all-in with more nonsense.Why are you tagging me in a nonsensical and rambling post that doesn’t have anything to do with anything I’ve said?
I fear for the future of this nation when we have so many people like that.It’s always bizarre when people do that. On another level, it’s kind of concerning too…
Dishonest post. He was referencing rioters being enabled to riot.
Why are you misrepresenting his post? It must be because you know you don’t have a logically sound argument.
Post in good faith instead of making dishonest posts.
What else can it be when people cannot understand simple facts?
I'm sorry you think I lost.In other words, you've lost the argument but want to strut about the chessboard like you've won.
I'm sorry you think I lost.
You still have not cited anything that shows a senator can go where he pleases.
Ooops. Crossed treads. Still, you havbe not shown that in the other thread. He was not arrested.He was arrested. The burden is on you to cite the crime he was arrested for.
Ooops. Crossed treads. Still, you havbe not shown that in the other thread. He was not arrested.
Another thing you get wrong, like you constantly get facts wrong.
It was not dishonest at all, this was specially asked previously and there was a refusal to answer.
Guess I should have added rioters to the list of words MAGA abuses.
It is sick to watch people who enable rioters, and destruction, and then do not understand the threat others see them as.
They do that's the point to threaten you. It's not a protest. It's authoritarianism.
What medias' lie?It’s funny seeing you swallow the media’s lie so willingly.
You aren't all that discerning then.Reminds me of the maga clowns.
I missed the part where DeSantis said you can run over protesters. Can you quote it?Ron DeSantis says Floridians have right to hit protesters with cars
"That's their fault for impinging on you," Florida's governor said.www.newsweek.com
Just more right wing suppression of free speech, coming from DeSantis here with his looking to ramp up stochastic terrorism and have protesters get killed and ran over by drivers.
To whoWell, there it is, the protest is the threat.
I never was being anything else.Glad you were finally honest about it.
Maybe they need to see what he said in full context, instead of what a media outlet says he said:I missed the part where DeSantis said you can run over protesters. Can you quote it?
You are the one who may want to consider the Law of Holes. For instance, say you inadvertently drive into active civil unrest and a protest. You're now in the hole. If you decide to press your way forward through it anyway, you're digging it deeper by refusing to stop and potentially escalating the problem. The second Law of Holes is that you need to recognize that you haven't solved the problem and are still in the hole even after ceasing to dig, and that further action is required to extricate yourself from the hole. In this case, that would mean retreating or turning around. With DeSantis, what we're talking about here is the 'law of an A-hole'.lol. He didn't say that. Again, read what he said.
You might consider the Law of Holes.
He wouldn't be cuz people could just get out of the way.You are the one who may want to consider the Law of Holes. For instance, say you inadvertently drive into active civil unrest and a protest. You're now in the hole. If you decide to press your way forward through it anyway, you're digging it deeper by refusing to stop and potentially escalating the problem.
Sounds like the law of fascism to me. We've scumbags take over the street and don't get the hell out of the way and they pay the price for their own stupidity and somehow someone else's fault.The second Law of Holes is that you need to recognize that you haven't solved the problem and are still in the hole even after ceasing to dig, and that further action is required to extricate yourself from the hole. In this case, that would mean retreating or turning around. With DeSantis, what we're talking about here is the 'law of an A-hole'.
Do mobs only surround the front of vehicles when they mob them? Nope. What if you can't back up either?. If you decide to press your way forward through it anyway, you're digging it deeper by refusing to stop and potentially escalating the problem.
LOL. What is your definition of a rioter?It was not dishonest at all, this was specially asked previously and there was a refusal to answer.
Guess I should have added rioters to the list of words MAGA abuses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?