• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roberts sworn in to preside over Trump impeachment trial

swing_voter said:
Is Justice Roberts wearing his impeachment robes?

View attachment 67271934

Note the stripes on the upper arms. Justice Scalia had these robes specially made for Clinton's impeachment.
Click to expand...

Are you joking or something? Based on memory, you are wrong about the stripes and his name isn't Scalia...?
 
Lucky Roberts...he gets to be in the middle of a politically motivated ****storm.

I'd say "No thanks, give the job to someone else."
 
swing_voter said:
Is Justice Roberts wearing his impeachment robes?

View attachment 67271934

Note the stripes on the upper arms. Justice Scalia had these robes specially made for Clinton's impeachment.
Click to expand...

An “ode to the zebra man”. I hope his meds are in balance so he doesn’t get too creative like with Obamacare.
 
Just saw a bit about him on PBS, video in link.

Chief Justice John Roberts will preside over the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump -- only the third person ever to serve in that role. What exactly are his responsibilities, and how is Roberts’ own character likely to shape his contributions? The National Law Journal’s Marcia Coyle and CNN’s Joan Biskupic, both authors of books about the chief justice, join John Yang to discuss.
Click to expand...

How John Roberts will approach his role in Trump’s impeachment trial | PBS NewsHour
 
Roadvirus said:
Lucky Roberts...he gets to be in the middle of a politically motivated ****storm.

I'd say "No thanks, give the job to someone else."
Click to expand...
roberts will follow Rehnquist. who did nothing.
he is going to stay out of it.
 
ludin said:
roberts will follow Rehnquist. who did nothing.
he is going to stay out of it.
Click to expand...

People are both fantastically overestimating and underestimating the significance of his involvement. Your post is an example of the latter.

Interestingly enough, this miscalculation of his powers crosses the political aisle.
 
I would like to believe the chief justice will be wearing his I'm here to follow the law hat. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Michael Cole said:
Agreed, unless he needs to break a tie
Click to expand...

there will not be a tie. this is going to go close to full party line vote with a few
democrats voting to clear trump.
 
Cardinal said:
People are both fantastically overestimating and underestimating the significance of his involvement. Your post is an example of the latter.

Interestingly enough, this miscalculation of his powers crosses the political aisle.
Click to expand...

Not at all.

Senate Impeachment Trial: Chief Justice John Roberts' Role Will Be Limited : NPR

He likely will aspire to Rehnquist's puckish evaluation of his own role in the 1999 Senate trial. Borrowing a line from Gilbert and Sullivan's play Iolanthe, Rehnquist opined, "I did nothing in particular and did it very well."

he maybe asked to rule given the leftist to pout but anything he rules on can be overturned by a majority vote in the senate.
 
Kreton said:
What I found interesting is that the entire senate swore to be impartial.

After so many declared they would not be publicly.

Oaths mean nothing.
Click to expand...

What I find interesting is that the House didn't have to swear to anything when they impeached Trump. They were all free to be as dishonest as they wanted to impeach and now they expect honesty in the Senate. There's something seriously wrong with that process.
 
Moderate Right said:
What I find interesting is that the House didn't have to swear to anything when they impeached Trump. They were all free to be as dishonest as they wanted to impeach and now they expect honesty in the Senate. There's something seriously wrong with that process.
Click to expand...

The House members swore an oath when they were sworn in as members. Senators are jurists and are sworn in.
 
Moderate Right said:
What I find interesting is that the House didn't have to swear to anything when they impeached Trump. They were all free to be as dishonest as they wanted to impeach and now they expect honesty in the Senate. There's something seriously wrong with that process.
Click to expand...

Right but you are fine with Republicans in the senate opening vowing to break their oath to the trial and to the country. To ignore any and all evidence and regardless of what happened loyalty to party. Your hypocrisy and loyalty to the man you worship is not impressive. You don't find it interesting you are just justifying your hyper partisan extreme alt right wing narrative.
 
Kreton said:
Right but you are fine with Republicans in the senate opening vowing to break their oath to the trial and to the country. To ignore any and all evidence and regardless of what happened loyalty to party. Your hypocrisy and loyalty to the man you worship is not impressive. You don't find it interesting you are just justifying your hyper partisan extreme alt right wing narrative.
Click to expand...

I don't care because an impeachment trial is forced on us that shouldn't be there in the first place due to the dishonesty of Democrats.
 
Roadvirus said:
Lucky Roberts...he gets to be in the middle of a politically motivated ****storm.

I'd say "No thanks, give the job to someone else."
Click to expand...
That might depend upon whether he has strong ideology on the impeachment, and whether he wants his ideology to count?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom